Literature DB >> 28100029

Isolation with asymmetric gene flow during the nonsynchronous divergence of dry forest birds.

Jessica A Oswald1,2, Isaac Overcast3, William M Mauck4, Michael J Andersen4,5, Brian Tilston Smith4.   

Abstract

Dry forest bird communities in South America are often fragmented by intervening mountains and rainforests, generating high local endemism. The historical assembly of dry forest communities likely results from dynamic processes linked to numerous population histories among codistributed species. Nevertheless, species may diversify in the same way through time if landscape and environmental features, or species ecologies, similarly structure populations. Here we tested whether six co-distributed taxon pairs that occur in the dry forests of the Tumbes and Marañón Valley of northwestern South America show concordant patterns and modes of diversification. We employed a genome reduction technique, double-digest restriction site-associated DNA sequencing, and obtained 4407-7186 genomewide SNPs. We estimated demographic history in each taxon pair and inferred that all pairs had the same best-fit demographic model: isolation with asymmetric gene flow from the Tumbes into the Marañón Valley, suggesting a common diversification mode. Overall, we also observed congruence in effective population size (Ne ) patterns where ancestral Ne were 2.9-11.0× larger than present-day Marañón Valley populations and 0.3-2.0× larger than Tumbesian populations. Present-day Marañón Valley Ne was smaller than Tumbes. In contrast, we found simultaneous population isolation due to a single event to be unlikely as taxon pairs diverged over an extended period of time (0.1-2.9 Ma) with multiple nonoverlapping divergence periods. Our results show that even when populations of codistributed species asynchronously diverge, the mode of their differentiation can remain conserved over millions of years. Divergence by allopatric isolation due to barrier formation does not explain the mode of differentiation between these two bird assemblages; rather, migration of individuals occurred before and after geographic isolation.
© 2017 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  South America; coalescent; model selection; neotropical; phylogeography; speciation with gene flow

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28100029     DOI: 10.1111/mec.14013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Ecol        ISSN: 0962-1083            Impact factor:   6.185


  6 in total

1.  Whole-genome data reveal the complex history of a diverse ecological community.

Authors:  Lynsey Bunnefeld; Jack Hearn; Graham N Stone; Konrad Lohse
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Mito-nuclear discordance across a recent contact zone for California voles.

Authors:  Dana Lin; Ke Bi; Christopher J Conroy; Eileen A Lacey; Joshua G Schraiber; Rauri C K Bowie
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 2.912

3.  Gene flow and Andean uplift shape the diversification of Gasteracantha cancriformis (Araneae: Araneidae) in Northern South America.

Authors:  Fabian C Salgado-Roa; Carolina Pardo-Diaz; Eloisa Lasso; Carlos F Arias; Vera Nisaka Solferini; Camilo Salazar
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-06-25       Impact factor: 2.912

4.  The geography of evolutionary divergence in the highly endemic avifauna from the Sierra Madre del Sur, Mexico.

Authors:  Alberto Rocha-Méndez; Luis A Sánchez-González; Clementina González; Adolfo G Navarro-Sigüenza
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2019-12-30       Impact factor: 3.260

5.  Base-substitution mutation rate across the nuclear genome of Alpheus snapping shrimp and the timing of isolation by the Isthmus of Panama.

Authors:  Katherine Silliman; Jane L Indorf; Nancy Knowlton; William E Browne; Carla Hurt
Journal:  BMC Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-05-28

Review 6.  The Evolution of Comparative Phylogeography: Putting the Geography (and More) into Comparative Population Genomics.

Authors:  Scott V Edwards; V V Robin; Nuno Ferrand; Craig Moritz
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 3.416

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.