Literature DB >> 28100028

Perirhinal cortex involvement in allocentric spatial learning in the rat: Evidence from doubly marked tasks.

Juan M J Ramos1,2.   

Abstract

It has recently been suggested that the different cortices of the medial temporal lobe support a mixture of object and spatial processing functions, challenging the anterior model that emphasized a strict functional differentiation between regions. However, for some structures, the perirhinal cortex (Prh) for example, a number of studies using lesion methods have shown a profound deficit exclusively in tasks involving object learning but not allocentric spatial learning. It may be that the learning paradigms used in previous studies have not been sensitive enough to detect a possible allocentric deficit in Prh-lesioned animals. To examine whether Prh lesions critically affect allocentric spatial learning, experimental and control rats were trained in two doubly marked navigation tasks. In experiment 1, the use of either one of two different memory systems, allocentric versus egocentric, made it possible to locate the goal arm in a four-arm radial maze. In experiment 2, rats had to choose between an allocentric versus a S-R/habit strategy, both of which predicted the location of the goal arm. Results showed that both experimental and control animals learned both navigation tasks well, reaching the same level of performance at the end of training. However, a probe test performed 1 day after the learning ended revealed that Prh-damaged animals learned both tasks predominantly using a non-allocentric strategy. Specifically, in lesioned subjects the percentage of egocentric correct responses (experiment 1) and the percentage of habit-based correct responses (experiment 2) was significantly higher than in the control rats. On the other hand, in both experiments, control rats in the probe test presented a significantly higher number of allocentric correct responses than the lesioned subjects. These results clearly suggest that Prh is normally needed for using allocentric strategies in order to solve a navigation problem.
© 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  allocentric memory; egocentric response; medial temporal lobe; radial maze; spatial memory

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28100028     DOI: 10.1002/hipo.22707

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hippocampus        ISSN: 1050-9631            Impact factor:   3.899


  7 in total

Review 1.  Shared Functions of Perirhinal and Parahippocampal Cortices: Implications for Cognitive Aging.

Authors:  Sara N Burke; Leslie S Gaynor; Carol A Barnes; Russell M Bauer; Jennifer L Bizon; Erik D Roberson; Lee Ryan
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2018-03-16       Impact factor: 13.837

Review 2.  Integration of objects and space in perception and memory.

Authors:  Charles E Connor; James J Knierim
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2017-10-26       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Search strategy analysis of Tg4-42 Alzheimer Mice in the Morris Water Maze reveals early spatial navigation deficits.

Authors:  Nadine Curdt; Franziska W Schmitt; Caroline Bouter; Trendelina Iseni; Hanna C Weile; Berfin Altunok; Nicola Beindorff; Thomas A Bayer; Matthew B Cooke; Yvonne Bouter
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 4.  Reconciling the object and spatial processing views of the perirhinal cortex through task-relevant unitization.

Authors:  Julien Fiorilli; Jeroen J Bos; Xenia Grande; Judith Lim; Emrah Düzel; Cyriel M A Pennartz
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 3.899

5.  Involvement of the Postrhinal and Perirhinal Cortices in Microscale and Macroscale Visuospatial Information Encoding.

Authors:  Nithya Sethumadhavan; Thu-Huong Hoang; Christina Strauch; Denise Manahan-Vaughan
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2020-10-09       Impact factor: 3.558

6.  The Perirhinal Cortex Engages in Area and Layer-Specific Encoding of Item Dimensions.

Authors:  Nithya Sethumadhavan; Christina Strauch; Thu-Huong Hoang; Denise Manahan-Vaughan
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 3.558

Review 7.  Goal-directed interaction of stimulus and task demand in the parahippocampal region.

Authors:  Su-Min Lee; Seung-Woo Jin; Seong-Beom Park; Eun-Hye Park; Choong-Hee Lee; Hyun-Woo Lee; Heung-Yeol Lim; Seung-Woo Yoo; Jae Rong Ahn; Jhoseph Shin; Sang Ah Lee; Inah Lee
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 3.899

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.