Joseph J Armao Iv1, Irina Nyrkova2, Gad Fuks1, Artem Osypenko1, Mounir Maaloum1, Emilie Moulin1, Raul Arenal3,4, Odile Gavat1, Alexander Semenov2, Nicolas Giuseppone1. 1. SAMS Research Group, Institut Charles Sadron, University of Strasbourg-CNRS , 23 rue du Loess, BP 84047, 67034 Cedex 2 Strasbourg, France. 2. Institut Charles Sadron-CNRS , 23 rue du Loess, BP 84047, 67034 Cedex 2 Strasbourg, France. 3. Laboratorio de Microscopias Avanzadas (LMA), Instituto de Nanociencia de Aragon (INA) , U. Zaragoza, 50018 Zaragoza, Spain. 4. Fundacion ARAID , 50018 Zaragoza, Spain.
Abstract
The study of supramolecular polymers in the bulk, in diluted solution, and at the solid-liquid interface has recently become a major topic of interest, going from fundamental aspects to applications in materials science. However, examples of supramolecular polymers at the liquid-liquid interface are mostly unexplored. Here, we describe the supramolecular polymerization of triarylamine molecules and their light-triggered organization at a chloroform-water interface. The resulting interfacial nematic layer of these 1D supramolecular polymers is further used as a template for the precise alignment of spherical gold nanoparticles coming from the water phase. These hybrid thin films are spontaneously formed in a single process, without chemical prefunctionalization of the metallic nanoparticles, and their ordering is improved by centrifugation. The resulting polymer chains and strings of nanoparticles can be co-aligned with high anisotropy over very large distances. By using a combination of experimental and theoretical investigations, we decipher the full sequence of this oriented self-assembly process. In such a highly anisotropic configuration, electron energy loss spectroscopy reveals that the self-assembled nanoparticles behave as plasmonic waveguides.
The study of supramolecular polymers in the bulk, in diluted solution, and at the solid-liquid interface has recently become a major topic of interest, going from fundamental aspects to applications in materials science. However, examples of supramolecular polymers at the liquid-liquid interface are mostly unexplored. Here, we describe the supramolecular polymerization of triarylamine molecules and their light-triggered organization at a chloroform-water interface. The resulting interfacial nematic layer of these 1D supramolecular polymers is further used as a template for the precise alignment of spherical gold nanoparticles coming from the water phase. These hybrid thin films are spontaneously formed in a single process, without chemical prefunctionalization of the metallic nanoparticles, and their ordering is improved by centrifugation. The resulting polymer chains and strings of nanoparticles can be co-aligned with high anisotropy over very large distances. By using a combination of experimental and theoretical investigations, we decipher the full sequence of this oriented self-assembly process. In such a highly anisotropic configuration, electron energy loss spectroscopy reveals that the self-assembled nanoparticles behave as plasmonic waveguides.
Supramolecular polymers
are composed of monomeric units held together
by highly directional secondary interactions and with a general behavior
following the well-established theories of polymer physics.[1,2] Although high degrees of polymerization can be reached, the kinetic
lability between the monomers leads to original dynamic behaviors
that are supported by their sensitivity to weak external stimuli[3−5] and by their self-healing properties.[6−8] Supramolecular polymerization
is thus of high fundamental interest and results in new materials
which have been extensively studied in the bulk and in diluted solutions,[9−11] as well as at the solid–liquid interface.[12−16] However, to the best of our knowledge, supramolecular
polymers at the liquid–liquid interface (LLI) have not yet
received clear attention in the literature, nor toward fundamental
or applied research.[17−19] In this paper, we describe the ordered self-assembly
of an interfacial layer of supramolecular polymer chains that takes
place at the LLI. To illustrate the potential of such interfacial
supramolecular polymers, we show that this layer can serve as a highly
anisotropic template to order nanoparticles at the LLI. The method
thus appears to be of broad interest to access anisotropic hybrid
materials and, for instance, to build soft anisotropic plasmonic substrates.Indeed, up to now, the strategies studied to access precisely oriented
arrangements of plasmonic nanoparticles with emergent collective properties[20−23] can be divided into three categories: (i) manipulation
methods using top-down technologies;[24−26] (ii) templating methods from solution which include the engineering
of various organizing substrates such as DNA,[27,28] viruses,[29] and block copolymers;[30,31] and (iii) interfacial methods which include liquid–air
(Langmuir–Blodgett trough)[32] and
liquid–solid interface (patterned surfaces of block copolymers).[33] Further, a particularly appealing technology
that can be envisioned to aggregate nanoparticles in films consists
of their self-assembly at the liquid–liquid interface.[34−40] LLI platforms are indeed very attractive because they can be formed
without the requirement of advanced engineering tools, they are self-healing,
and they are easily renewable. Recently, isotropic films of nanoparticles
at the LLI have been formed and used as conductive mirror-like coatings[41] and as sensors via in situ surface-enhanced
Raman scattering (SERS).[42] However, reaching
anisotropic self-assembly of spherical nanoparticles at LLIs is much
more challenging, thus precluding their use for a number of optoelectronic
plasmonic devices.[43,44] Therefore, the potential use
of monodimensional supramolecular polymers at the LLI as anisotropic
templating substrates is of particular interest in this direction.
Results
and Discussion
The interfacial films of the present study
are formed spontaneously
upon shaking using a biphasic system consisting (i) of a chloroform phase, at the bottom, containing supramolecular
nanofibers based on triarylamine trisamide 1 irradiated
for 1 h with white light;[45−53] and (ii) of an aqueous phase, at the top, containing
a suspension of 12 nm diameter spherical gold nanoparticles (AuNPs)
coated with citrate molecules (Figure A). Imaging of the film by atomic force microscopy
(AFM) in Figure B
revealed two distinct sides comprising (i) one layer
of triarylamine fibrils at the bottom, and (ii) one
layer of AuNPs at the top.
Figure 1
(A) (i) Photograph of the biphasic
(chloroform/water)
system; (ii) chloroform solution contains triarylamine 1, which is self-assembled in helical fibrils that are doped
by partial photo-oxidation of 1 to 1; (iii) water phase
contains a suspension of gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) being coated by
negatively charged citrate molecules; (iv) hybrid
film formed at the LLI, which is here photographed with an air bubble
trapped inside. (B) AFM height images of the film from the bottom
side (i) and from the top side (ii). (C) Helical structure of a supramolecular fibril containing 50%
of neutral units 1 (shown in yellow), 50% of charged
units 1, and surrounded
by the chloride counterions (black balls numbered from 0 to 10).[54] The colored lines indicate the three “chains”
of amide groups connected by hydrogen bonds; three characteristic
periods within the fibril (h1, P1, P2): h2 = 2h1 = 0.970
nm, contour length per radical; df = 1.7
nm, effective fibril thickness; r1 = 0.7
nm, radial displacement of condensed chloride ions from the fibril
axis (distance between Cl– and the central N+ of 1 radical).
In the helical stack, each molecule is rotated by the angle α
= 360°/18 = 20° with respect to the previous one.
(A) (i) Photograph of the biphasic
(chloroform/water)
system; (ii) chloroform solution contains triarylamine 1, which is self-assembled in helical fibrils that are doped
by partial photo-oxidation of 1 to 1; (iii) water phase
contains a suspension of gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) being coated by
negatively charged citrate molecules; (iv) hybrid
film formed at the LLI, which is here photographed with an air bubble
trapped inside. (B) AFM height images of the film from the bottom
side (i) and from the top side (ii). (C) Helical structure of a supramolecular fibril containing 50%
of neutral units 1 (shown in yellow), 50% of charged
units 1, and surrounded
by the chloride counterions (black balls numbered from 0 to 10).[54] The colored lines indicate the three “chains”
of amide groups connected by hydrogen bonds; three characteristic
periods within the fibril (h1, P1, P2): h2 = 2h1 = 0.970
nm, contour length per radical; df = 1.7
nm, effective fibril thickness; r1 = 0.7
nm, radial displacement of condensed chloride ions from the fibril
axis (distance between Cl– and the central N+ of 1 radical).
In the helical stack, each molecule is rotated by the angle α
= 360°/18 = 20° with respect to the previous one.Importantly, the preirradiation
of the chloroform solution of triarylamines
with a halogen lamp (leading to the partial photo-oxidation of the
fibers in the form of 1)[47] is mandatory for the film formation.
Indeed, control experiments performed in the dark did not produce
any film at any concentration. In addition, the presence of the triarylamines
is necessary to accumulate the nanoparticles at the LLI. Indeed, a
control experiment in the presence of light and only AuNPs revealed
their stable suspension in water for weeks (see Supporting Information section 3a). Finally, negatively charged
AuNPs are necessary to produce a hybrid layer. Indeed, by using cationic
nanoparticles coated with ammonium and obtained by ligand exchange
from the citrated ones (see Supporting Information section 3b), no hybrid film was formed using the same experimental
protocol.Visible absorption measurements display a 90 nm red
shift between
the colloidal nanoparticle suspension and the interfacial film (Figure A), which is a typical
plasmonic effect for nanoparticles being in close contact. Examination
of the interfacial film with a confocal Raman microscope also revealed
a SERS effect indicating the close proximity of the triarylamine nanofibers
with the AuNPs (Figure B, blue). All of the peaks observed are due to the vibronic signature
of the polymer which is enhanced by the SERS effect. This signal is
only observed when focusing the laser on areas with triarylamine nanofibers
and AuNPs, whereas no signal is observed when focusing the laser on
areas with solely nanofibers (Figure B, black). Remarkably, when the agitation method was
changed from shaking to stirring, we observed a partial anisotropic
ordering of the AuNPs and nanofibers in some locations of the film.
We hypothesized that the lateral force being applied to the film interface
during the stirring was responsible for this partial organization.
In order to make the results more regular, we performed a series of
experiments using a swinging bucket centrifuge with a controlled rotation
speed. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images of the hybrid
films were obtained for different centrifugal forces (g), starting from a 5 mM chloroform solution of 1 and
a 1.3 × 10–9 M suspension of AuNPs (Figure C). This series of
micrographs reveals a marked improvement of the nanoparticle alignment
upon centrifugation, reaching almost perfect orientations over large
domains for the higher rotation speeds. This long-range ordering was
further evidenced at higher scale by cross-polarized optical microscopy,
showing the formation of a nematic liquid-crystal phase with large
domain sizes when increasing the centrifugation rate (Figure D). Similar ordering was also
measured with larger AuNPs having a diameter of 44 nm (see Supporting Information section 3c and Figure
S12). To the best of our knowledge, no comparable ordering of nanoparticles
at the LLI and on such large scale has been reported in the literature.
Figure 2
(A) Extinction
spectra of the plasmonic film of AuNPs compared
to their colloidal suspension. (B) SERS response of the hybrid film
containing fibers and nanoparticles (blue) and of regions containing
only fibers (black). (C) Typical TEM images of the film formed at
the LLI (c(1) = 5 mM) for the following
centrifugation conditions: (i) 0g and overnight free diffusion, (ii) 5g for 1 h, (iii) 100g for 1 h, (iv) 1000g for 1 h. (D) Optical microscopy
under crossed polarizers for the following centrifugation conditions:
(i) 0g and overnight free diffusion,
(ii) 1000g for 1 h.
(A) Extinction
spectra of the plasmonic film of AuNPs compared
to their colloidal suspension. (B) SERS response of the hybrid film
containing fibers and nanoparticles (blue) and of regions containing
only fibers (black). (C) Typical TEM images of the film formed at
the LLI (c(1) = 5 mM) for the following
centrifugation conditions: (i) 0g and overnight free diffusion, (ii) 5g for 1 h, (iii) 100g for 1 h, (iv) 1000g for 1 h. (D) Optical microscopy
under crossed polarizers for the following centrifugation conditions:
(i) 0g and overnight free diffusion,
(ii) 1000g for 1 h.Quantification of the anisotropy for different centrifugal
forces
was determined by a statistical analysis of a series of TEM images
over three characteristic surface areas between 2.25 and 25 μm2 (Figure )
and quantified using the orientational parameter S (0 ≤ S ≤ 1). For concentration c = 5 mM of 1, and for all the surface areas
considered, S was improved with the rotation speed.
For instance, it was possible to reach S = 0.76 at
10g for a surface of 25 μm2 (Figure A(iii)), with S = 0.18 at 0g for the
same surface (Figure A(i)). Interestingly, the quality of the ordering
was further improved by working at a lower concentration of 1 (c = 1 mM). Considering again the larger
surface area (25 μm2), S is increased
from 0.13 at 0g (no ordering) to 0.96 at 10g (almost perfect ordering) (Figure A(iv)). At the same concentration
(c(1) = 1 mM), one can also notice that,
for smaller surface areas, a partial anisotropic ordering is observed
even without centrifugation (S = 0.62 for 9 μm2 and S = 0.73 for 2.25 μm2) (Figure B(ii)).
Figure 3
(A) TEM images (squares with the surface = 5 μm
× 5
μm) were analyzed to determine the angular space correlation
alignment intensity distributions (plots) and the resulting orientational
parameter S (value given in red); each color reflects
a particular orientation of the nanoparticle strings; (i) no centrifugation, overnight diffusion starting with a 5 mM solution
of 1; (ii) 1 h centrifugation of 2g starting with a 5 mM solution of 1; (iii) 1 h centrifugation of 10g starting
with a 5 mM solution of 1; (iv) 1 h
centrifugation of 10g starting with a 1 mM solution
of 1. (B) Orientational parameter S as
a function of the surface area and of the applied centrifugal force
starting from a 5 mM solution of 1 (i) and a 1 mM solution of 1 (ii). Error
bars are established for over 16 measurements for each centrifugal
force.
(A) TEM images (squares with the surface = 5 μm
× 5
μm) were analyzed to determine the angular space correlation
alignment intensity distributions (plots) and the resulting orientational
parameter S (value given in red); each color reflects
a particular orientation of the nanoparticle strings; (i) no centrifugation, overnight diffusion starting with a 5 mM solution
of 1; (ii) 1 h centrifugation of 2g starting with a 5 mM solution of 1; (iii) 1 h centrifugation of 10g starting
with a 5 mM solution of 1; (iv) 1 h
centrifugation of 10g starting with a 1 mM solution
of 1. (B) Orientational parameter S as
a function of the surface area and of the applied centrifugal force
starting from a 5 mM solution of 1 (i) and a 1 mM solution of 1 (ii). Error
bars are established for over 16 measurements for each centrifugal
force.The mechanism for the highly anisotropic
co-self-assembly that
occurs at the LLI is first related to the structure and dynamics of
the supramolecular polymers in the organic phase. As shown in Figure C, molecule 1 self-assembles in single-columnar aggregates (fibrils) with
a helical stacking structure[47] having three
characteristic periods: h1 ≈ 0.485
nm (contour length per molecule), P1 =
6h1 (apparent helical period), and P2 = 3P1 (full helical
pitch). Upon 1 h of light irradiation, the fibrils become charged
with ∼50% of units in the radical cation state (1 with central N+). Due
to the low dielectric constant of chloroform, the Cl– counterions (coming from the reduction of chloroform) are condensed
onto the fibrils and are themselves arranged helically around the
fibril with a pitch of P2 (see black balls
in Figure C and Figure S2). The fibrils are stabilized by three
hydrogen bonds per molecule, aromatic π–π stacking,
and Coulomb (dipole–dipole) interactions. The fibril scission
energy Esc ∼ 24.5kBT (estimated by all-atomic modeling
including solvation effects)[48] is high
enough to ensure very low critical aggregation concentration. The
length distribution of fibrils is defined by the balance between fibril
scission and fusion events (the end evaporation mechanism[55] is subdominant for long fibrils): (n) + (m) ⇌ (n + m), that is, c = Kcc, where c is concentration of n-mers. The scission probability is defined by Esc, whereas fusion is associated with entropy loss (confinement
to the effective bond volume, vb), leading
to an equilibrium constant of the reaction K = vbe.
Remarkably, the fusion is accelerated in the presence of photoinduced
radicals because fibril ends are then decorated with N+Cl– dipoles attracting each other (with an energy Edd) and thus increasing the frequency of end
collisions (Figure S3). As a result, the
fusion constant increases significantly (by ∼104): K → K* = Ke. The scission/fusion
process is not affected otherwise as the end dipoles annihilate on
contact by the following binary reduction reaction: 2(N+ + Cl–) → 2N + Cl2 (Figure S2C).[48] Accordingly,
the mean fibril length of linear fibrils L̅ ≃ h1(K*c)1/2 strongly increases (see supplementary equation S1). Based on the experimental L̅ ∼ 1 μm at c = 1 mM
(Figure S4D), we get Esc ≈ 24.7kBT, in agreement with Esc obtained
by modeling. The fibril persistence length lp ≈ 20 nm is obtained (see supplementary equation S2) based on the mean contour length of supertwisted
rings L̅ring ∼ 250 nm at c = 0.1 mM (Figure S4A–C). In a hierarchical organization process, two fibrils then attract
each other side-to-side mainly due to Coulomb interactions of ionized 1 and Cl– counterions. The attraction is stronger for fibrils of opposite
chiralities (see Supporting Information section 2a), but in all cases, it is not enough to overcome entropic
penalty for double columnar complex formation. Bundles of many fibrils
may be, however, stable due to their higher rigidity, but their nucleation
requires higher concentration, c ≳ 5 mM, as
verified experimentally by AFM imaging (Figure S4E).In the biphasic chloroform/water systems, the fibrils
are mostly
hydrophobic and remain in the organic phase. However, the Cl– counterions strongly prefer water phase to bulk chloroform in spite
of their electrostatic binding on triarylamine fibrils (see Supporting Information section 2b and Figure
S5). As a result, some Cl– ions escape from fibrils
located near the interface and leave them charged. The charged fibrils
are thus driven to the interface by interactions with the opposite
image charges (due to high dielectric constant of water). This trend
was supported experimentally by measuring the interfacial tension
between chloroform and water: it is shown to drop from 32.5 mN·m–1 for a nonirradiated chloroform solution of 1 (c = 1 mM) to 26 mN·m–1 after irradiation of 1 h, confirming the migration of the charged
fibers towards the LLI (see Supporting Information sections 2b and 3d and Figure S13). The total energy gain on fibril
adsorption is ΔF ≈ −5kBT per contour length segment,
ΔL = h2 ≈
1 nm for optimal fraction ft ≈
1/3 of transferred counterions (Figure S5). Being strongly attracted electrostatically to the LLI, the fibrils
tend to form there a dense adsorbed monolayer and thus to order. Indeed,
at thermodynamic equilibrium, because of geometrical constraints and
because of their side-to-side electrostatic attraction, the fibrils
must be aligned nearly parallel with a high nematic order (i.e., with
orientational parameter S close to 1). In practice,
however, and in contrast to their fast diffusion-controlled adsorption
taking ∼1 s for c = 1 mM, the ordering process
is very slow. This is due to the slow dynamics of long (L̅ > 1 μm; Mw > 1.6 ×
106 g mol–1) and rigid fibrils in dense
confined
conditions at the surface[56] involving jamming
and long-lasting defects like fibril crossings (Figure S6). Vibrations during the centrifugation process may
induce interfacial waves aiding to heal the orientational defects
and providing longer-range fibril alignment (see Supporting Information section 2b for a detailed explanation).
In addition, the charged monolayer of fibrils induces positive potential
ζ = 1.45kBT/e in water close to the
interface with chloroform. The fibril charge is compensated by condensed
and diffused layers of anions (mostly citrate trianions) in water
close to the LLI (Figure S7).Turning
to AuNPs in the aqueous phase, we established that they
are protected by adsorbed layers of condensed hydrated ions: alternating
Na+ cations and citrate anions adsorbed directly on the
gold surface (see Supporting Information section 2c). The ion layer shows a total thickness hst ≈ 1.5 nm (Figure S8) and is indispensable for steric stabilization of AuNPs at short
distances. At larger separations, the nanoparticles are stabilized
electrostatically due to their negative surface ζ-potential,
ζs = −1.9kBT/e. The AuNPs are thus attracted by the
oppositely charged interface containing the supramolecular fibrils.
As they approach it closer than ∼5 nm, the condensed interfacial
anions are driven away by their repulsion with AuNPs, thus increasing
the effective positive interfacial charge by a factor of 5 (see Supporting Information section 2c). The resultant
attraction energy amounts to ∼110kBT, ensuring strong adsorption of AuNPs on the LLI.
It is remarkable that even uncharged AuNPs would be adsorbed on the
interface with charged supramolecular fibrils as the net attraction
energy of ∼10kBT is due to induction of a negative charge in the AuNP surface region
opposite to the interface. The kinetics of irreversible adsorption
of AuNPs on the interface is controlled by their diffusion/sedimentation
aided by centrifugation. The NPs then tend to form a well-organized
hexagonal structure at the interface as soon as a significant surface
coverage is achieved. Remarkably, for less dense regions, micrographs
mostly show ordered elongated clusters following orientation of the
aligned fibrils because the adsorbed NPs attract each other laterally
due to a significant redistribution of their surface charge caused
by the proximity of positively charged fibrils (Figure S9).To probe further the optical properties
of the hybrid film, we
performed high-resolution electron energy loss spectroscopy (HR-EELS)[57,58] measurements to study the local plasmonic response of aligned AuNPs
obtained at 10 g and c(1) = 5 mM (Figure ). An EELS spectrum-image
(SPIM) in the low-loss region (below 50 eV) is shown in Figure C for two NPs in close contact
(and obtained from the green marked area of Figure A). The intensity maps of the local surface
plasmon resonances (LSPRs) extracted from this EELS-SPIM show blue
shifts and broadenings of the dipolar LSPR mode at ∼2.2 eV,
typical for two spherical NPs arranged in a more ellipsoidal shape
(Figure C,D).[47] The behavior of these LSPR modes strongly depends
on the dielectric environment of the NPs (Figure D(ii)).[56,59] A shift and
an extra contribution at higher energy (above 2.4 eV) can be observed
in this EEL spectrum, which can be due to the substrate effect or
the presence of the NPs at the top.[59] A
HAADF-STEM image of a longer string of Au nanoparticles is shown in Figure E. The intensity
maps extracted from the low-loss EELS-SPIM acquired on the green marked
area show the spatial distribution of the excited LSPR modes, corresponding
to the plasmon resonances couplings of the different NPs (Figure F). The peaks observed
in Figure G correspond
to LSPR (different (dark and bright) transversal/longitudinal) modes
shown in the intensity maps.[60]
Figure 4
(A) Low-magnification
high-angle annular dark-field (HAADF) scanning
transmission electron microscopy (STEM) image of two Au nanoparticles
at close distance. (B) High-resolution HAADF-STEM image of two other
Au nanoparticles, showing their high crystalline quality degree. (C)
Intensity maps extracted from the EELS-SPIM recorded in the green
marked area of (A), after removing the zero-loss peak (ZLP). These
intensity maps show the spatial distribution of the LSPR mode of these
AuNPs. (D) EEL spectra (each of them corresponds to the sum of four
spectra) extracted from the EELS-SPIM in the areas marked in (A) and
labeled as (i–v), respectively. (E) Low-magnification HAADF-STEM
image of a typical string of spherical AuNPs. An EELS-SPIM has been
recorded in the squared area marked in green. (F) Intensity maps extracted
from the EELS-SPIM after removing the ZLP and showing the spatial
distribution of the LSPR modes. (G) EEL spectra (each of them corresponds
to the sum of four spectra) obtained from the EELS-SPIM in the regions
marked in (E).
(A) Low-magnification
high-angle annular dark-field (HAADF) scanning
transmission electron microscopy (STEM) image of two Au nanoparticles
at close distance. (B) High-resolution HAADF-STEM image of two other
Au nanoparticles, showing their high crystalline quality degree. (C)
Intensity maps extracted from the EELS-SPIM recorded in the green
marked area of (A), after removing the zero-loss peak (ZLP). These
intensity maps show the spatial distribution of the LSPR mode of these
AuNPs. (D) EEL spectra (each of them corresponds to the sum of four
spectra) extracted from the EELS-SPIM in the areas marked in (A) and
labeled as (i–v), respectively. (E) Low-magnification HAADF-STEM
image of a typical string of spherical AuNPs. An EELS-SPIM has been
recorded in the squared area marked in green. (F) Intensity maps extracted
from the EELS-SPIM after removing the ZLP and showing the spatial
distribution of the LSPR modes. (G) EEL spectra (each of them corresponds
to the sum of four spectra) obtained from the EELS-SPIM in the regions
marked in (E).The enhancement of the
electromagnetic field is maximal in the
hot spots (gap between the NPs) as it is expected for surface plasmon
couplings in linear chains of NPs.[60] This
demonstrates that this self-assembly method induces plasmonic waveguide
behavior due to ordering of the hybrid film.
Conclusion
To
summarize, the basic features of the co-self-assembly at LLI
described here involve (i) a light-assisted supramolecular
polymerization of neutral and oxidized cationic triarylamine units
producing long positively charged hydrophobic filaments whose length
and periodic structure are greatly enhanced by photodoping;[47] (ii) a transfer of counterions
to the favorable aqueous environment rendering the filaments positively
charged and trapped near the interface by attraction to the image
charge; (iii) a further growth and a nematic packing
by dynamic scission/recombination of the supramolecular polymer fibers
at the LLI; (iv) an adsorption of negatively charged
AuNPs dispersed in water on the LLI. The resultant interfacial structure
comprises a highly anisotropic layer of conductive supramolecular
fibrils and a plasmonic layer of AuNPs. The nematic self-assembled
structure of AuNPs reflects the order of the underlying fibril layer.
Overall, the light-controlled supramolecular organization at the LLI,
the use of supramolecular polymers as nematic templates, the hybrid
inorganic–organic nature of the film, the superior level of
anisotropy that can be reached compared to the present literature,
and the verified plasmonic coupling between the AuNPs are of particular
fundamental interest and opens interesting perspectives for potential
applications of such anisotropic functional structures in material
science. Although we have shown that such a self-assembled system
requires particular constraints to function properly, it is unlikely
that it would represent a unique example. Our theoretical analysis
invites us to further probe experimentally its generality and robustness.
It stimulates a search for new systems where Coulomb forces can drive
complex nanostructure formation at the LLI. The scope of this self-assembly
process will be the subject of our future research by using for example
(i) other organic molecules capable of 1D self-assembly
and including ionic groups, (ii) covalent polymeric
ionomer in an organic medium, (iii) other metal nanoparticles
dispersed in water, either charged or even uncharged.
Authors: Stefan A Maier; Pieter G Kik; Harry A Atwater; Sheffer Meltzer; Elad Harel; Bruce E Koel; Ari A G Requicha Journal: Nat Mater Date: 2003-04 Impact factor: 43.841
Authors: Onofrio M Maragò; Philip H Jones; Pietro G Gucciardi; Giovanni Volpe; Andrea C Ferrari Journal: Nat Nanotechnol Date: 2013-11 Impact factor: 39.213
Authors: Peter A Mistark; Soojin Park; Sibel Ebru Yalcin; Dong Hyun Lee; Ozgur Yavuzcetin; Mark T Tuominen; Thomas P Russell; Marc Achermann Journal: ACS Nano Date: 2009-12-22 Impact factor: 15.881
Authors: Xiao Li; José A Martínez-González; Orlando Guzmán; Xuedan Ma; Kangho Park; Chun Zhou; Yu Kambe; Hyeong Min Jin; James A Dolan; Paul F Nealey; Juan J de Pablo Journal: Sci Adv Date: 2019-11-29 Impact factor: 14.136