Literature DB >> 28099748

Medium-term outcomes of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy or sacrohysteropexy versus vaginal sacrospinous ligament fixation for middle compartment prolapse.

Yisong Chen1, Keqin Hua2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSC) or sacrohysteropexy (LSH) with vaginal sacrospinous ligament fixation (VSSLF) for middle compartment pelvic organ prolapse (POP).
METHODS: Data were retrospectively reviewed from patients with POP (stage 3 or worse) who underwent LSC, LSH, or VSSLF at a center in Shanghai between January 2009 and March 2014. POP quantification (POP-Q) and Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory scores were compared at the 2-year follow-up.
RESULTS: Data were available for the 2-year follow-up for 102 LSC, 11 LSH, and 94 VSSLF procedures. Compared with patients who had undergone VSSLF, those who had undergone LSC/LSH had better POP-Q C values (P<0.001), longer total vaginal length (TVL) (P<0.001), and lower Aa and Ba scores (P=0.003 and P=0.002, respectively). Apical compartment and overall success rates of LSC/LSH and VSSLF did not differ significantly. Quality of life was improved in both groups (P<0.001). Both groups achieved symptomatic relief, although bowel and urinary functions were significantly improved only in the VSSLF group (P<0.001 for both). More patients in the LSC/LSH group were sexually active at 2 years (P<0.001); improvement in sex life was similar between the groups.
CONCLUSION: Although LSC/LSH achieved longer TVL, both groups achieved the same success rate and improvement in quality of life. Specifically, VSSLF yielded a significant improvement in bowel and urinary function.
© 2017 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Laparoscopic; Sacrocolpopexy; Sacrohysteropexy; Sacrospinous ligament fixation; Uterine and vaginal vault prolapse

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28099748     DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.12097

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet        ISSN: 0020-7292            Impact factor:   3.561


  5 in total

1.  Association between method of pelvic organ prolapse repair involving the vaginal apex and re-operation: a population-based, retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  You Maria Wu; Jennifer Reid; Queena Chou; Barry MacMillan; Yvonne Leong; Blayne Welk
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 2.  Mesh exposure following minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy: a narrative review.

Authors:  Stephanie Deblaere; Jan Hauspy; Karen Hansen
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 1.932

3.  Transvaginal Bilateral Sacrospinous Fixation after Second Recurrence of Vaginal Vault Prolapse: Efficacy and Impact on Quality of Life and Sexuality.

Authors:  Salvatore Giovanni Vitale; Antonio Simone Laganà; Marco Noventa; Pierluigi Giampaolino; Brunella Zizolfi; Salvatore Butticè; Valentina Lucia La Rosa; Giuseppe Gullo; Diego Rossetti
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 4.  Long-term mesh erosion rate following abdominal robotic reconstructive pelvic floor surgery: a prospective study and overview of the literature.

Authors:  Femke van Zanten; Jan J van Iersel; Tim J C Paulides; Paul M Verheijen; Ivo A M J Broeders; Esther C J Consten; Egbert Lenters; Steven E Schraffordt Koops
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 2.894

5.  Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy Plus Colporrhaphy With a Small Intestine Submucosa Graft Versus Total Pelvic Floor Reconstruction for Advanced Prolapse: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Junyan Wang; Xiaojuan Wang; Keqin Hua; Yisong Chen
Journal:  Int Neurourol J       Date:  2019-06-30       Impact factor: 2.835

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.