| Literature DB >> 28099655 |
Jorge Alexandre Harrison Arroz1, Francisco Chirrute1, Chandana Mendis1, Marta Honesta Chande1, Veronique Kollhoff1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess the ownership and use of mosquito nets in 2014, in Mozambique.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 28099655 PMCID: PMC5152810 DOI: 10.1590/S1518-8787.2016050006335
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Rev Saude Publica ISSN: 0034-8910 Impact factor: 2.106
Ownership and use of insecticide-treated nets by districts assessed per provinces. Mozambique, 2015.
| Province | Question 1 | Question 2 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| |||||||
| Ownership of insecticide-treated nets | Use of insecticide-treated nets | |||||||
|
|
| |||||||
| Yes | % | No | % | Yes | % | No | % | |
| Gaza | 653 | 81.6b | 147 | 18.4 | 564 | 70.7c | 234 | 29.3 |
| Cabo Delgado | 1,401 | 82.3b | 302 | 17.7 | 1,249 | 89.2a | 152 | 10.8 |
| Sofala | 814 | 81.5b | 185 | 18.5 | 804 | 80.5b | 195 | 19.5 |
| Zambezia | 395 | 79.0c | 105 | 21.0 | 369 | 73.8c | 131 | 26.2 |
| Inhambane | 728 | 86.7a | 112 | 13.3 | 683 | 81.3b | 157 | 18.7 |
| Niassa | 338 | 86.0a | 55 | 14.0 | 316 | 85.4a | 54 | 14.6 |
| Tete | 139 | 69.5c | 61 | 30.5 | 120 | 60.0c | 80 | 40.0 |
| Manica | 737 | 81.9b | 163 | 18.1 | 644 | 87.4a | 93 | 12.6 |
| Nampula | 377 | 96.7a | 13 | 3.3 | 363 | 93.8a | 24 | 6.2 |
| Mozambique | 5,582 | 83.0b | 1,143 | 17.0 | 5,112 | 82.0b | 1,120 | 18.0 |
a Desirable Situation (coverage ≥ 85.0%).
b Intermediate situation (coverage between 80.0% and 85.0%).
c Undesirable Situation (coverage < 80.0%).
Ownership and use of insecticide-treated nets per provinces, and progress toward the campaign’s goal. Mozambique, 2015.
| Province | Ownership (%) | Use (%) | % of districts covered | Goal “Ownership” (%) | Goal “Use” (%) | Difference “ownership” and goal | Difference “use” and goal | Progression toward the “use” goal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Niassa | 86.0 | 85.4 | 66.7 | 85.0 | 85.0 | +1.0 | +0.4 | Desirable situationa |
| Cabo Delgado | 82.3 | 89.2 | 100 | 85.0 | 85.0 | -2.7 | +4.2 | Desirable situationa |
| Nampula | 96.7 | 93.8 | 23.5 | 85.0 | 85.0 | +11.7 | +8.8 | Desirable situationa |
| Zambezia | 79.0 | 73.8 | 38.5 | 85.0 | 85.0 | -6.0 | -11.2% | Undesirable situationc |
| Tete | 69.5 | 60.0 | 22.2 | 85.0 | 85.0 | -15.5 | -25.0 | Undesirable situationc |
| Manica | 81.9 | 87.4 | 90.0 | 85.0 | 85.0 | -3.1 | +2.4 | Desirable situationa |
| Sofala | 81.5 | 80.5 | 100 | 85.0 | 85.0 | -3.5 | -4.5 | Intermediate situationb |
| Inhambane | 86.7 | 81.3 | 90.0 | 85.0 | 85.0 | +1.7 | -3.7 | Intermediate situationb |
| Gaza | 81.6 | 70.7 | 100 | 85.0 | 85.0 | -3.4 | -14.3 | Undesirable situationc |
| Mozambique | 83.0 | 82.0 | 68.0 | 85.0 | 85.0 | -2.0 | -3.0 | Intermediate situationb |
a No difference toward the goal or positive value of the difference.
b Difference toward the goal and negative value between -1 and -10.
c Difference toward the goal and negative value between > -10.