Literature DB >> 28099375

Routine neurosurgical consultation is not necessary in mild blunt traumatic brain injury.

Paul R Lewis1, Casey E Dunne, James D Wallace, Jason B Brill, Richard Y Calvo, Jayraan Badiee, Michael J Sise, Vishal Bansal, C Beth Sise, Steven R Shackford.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Brain Trauma Foundation guidelines provide indications for neurosurgical intervention in traumatic brain injury (TBI) with moderate or severe intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). In TBI patients with less severe ICH, the utility of neurosurgical consultation remains unclear. We sought to determine if routine neurosurgical consultation is necessary for mild blunt TBI patients with ICH.
METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 500 consecutive blunt TBI patients aged 15 years or older with Glasgow Coma Scale score of ≥13 and ICH on initial head computed tomography admitted to a Level I trauma center over 28 months. Outcomes were neurosurgical intervention (craniotomy, craniectomy, ventriculostomy, or intracranial pressure monitor placement) and in-hospital mortality. Statistical significance was assessed at a p < 0.05.
RESULTS: Of 500 patients, 49 (9.8%) underwent neurosurgical intervention. Neurosurgical intervention was more frequent in male patients (75.5% vs. 61.2%, p = 0.049), patients with higher head Abbreviated Injury Scale score (4.7 vs. 3.8, p < 0.0001), patients with an abnormal initial neurological examination (30.6% vs. 12.6%, p = 0.001), or patients with skull fracture (28.6% vs. 16.0%, p = 0.026) and was associated with higher mortality (8.2% vs. 2.0%, p = 0.010). Neurosurgical intervention was not associated with intoxication, preinjury antiplatelet/anticoagulation agents, or progression of ICH on second head computed tomography. Neurosurgical consultation was documented in 466 patients (93.2%). For patients without neurosurgical intervention, consultation did not change management.
CONCLUSION: Routine neurosurgical consultation for blunt TBI with ICH seems unnecessary, regardless of intoxication or preinjury antiplatelet or anticoagulation therapy. A more selective approach is warranted to decrease hospital charges and optimize use of neurosurgical consultation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Care management study, level IV.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28099375     DOI: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001388

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg        ISSN: 2163-0755            Impact factor:   3.313


  4 in total

1.  The European guideline on management of major bleeding and coagulopathy following trauma: fifth edition.

Authors:  Donat R Spahn; Bertil Bouillon; Vladimir Cerny; Jacques Duranteau; Daniela Filipescu; Beverley J Hunt; Radko Komadina; Marc Maegele; Giuseppe Nardi; Louis Riddez; Charles-Marc Samama; Jean-Louis Vincent; Rolf Rossaint
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2019-03-27       Impact factor: 9.097

2.  Emergency department observation of mild traumatic brain injury with minor radiographic findings: shorter stays, less expensive, and no increased risk compared to hospital admission.

Authors:  Brandon K Root; John H Kanter; Dan C Calnan; Miguel Reyes-Zaragosa; Harman S Gill; Patricia L Lanter
Journal:  J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open       Date:  2020-06-17

3.  Inter-facility transfer of patients with traumatic intracranial hemorrhage and GCS 14-15: The pilot study of a screening protocol by neurosurgeon to avoid unnecessary transfers.

Authors:  Nima Alan; Song Kim; Nitin Agarwal; Jamie Clarke; Donald M Yealy; Aaron A Cohen-Gadol; Raymond F Sekula
Journal:  J Clin Neurosci       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 1.961

4.  Multicenter assessment of the Brain Injury Guidelines and a proposal of guideline modifications.

Authors:  Abid D Khan; Anna J Elseth; Jacqueline A Brosius; Eliza Moskowitz; Sean C Liebscher; Michael J Anstadt; Julie A Dunn; John H McVicker; Thomas Schroeppel; Richard P Gonzalez
Journal:  Trauma Surg Acute Care Open       Date:  2020-05-28
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.