Brian M Dulmovits1, Jimmy Hom, Anupama Narla, Narla Mohandas, Lionel Blanc. 1. aCenter for Autoimmune and Musculoskeletal Diseases, The Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Manhasset bDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Pediatrics, Hofstra Northwell School of Medicine, Hempstead, New York cDepartment of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California dRed Cell Physiology Laboratory, New York Blood Center, New York, New York, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The erythroid progenitors burst-forming unit-erythroid and colony-forming unit-erythroid have a critical role in erythropoiesis. These cells represent a heterogeneous and poorly characterized population with modifiable self-renewal, proliferation and differentiation capabilities. This review focuses on the current state of erythroid progenitor biology with regard to immunophenotypic identification and regulatory programs. In addition, we will discuss the therapeutic implications of using these erythroid progenitors as pharmacologic targets. RECENT FINDINGS: Erythroid progenitors are classically characterized by the appearance of morphologically defined colonies in semisolid cultures. However, these prior systems preclude a more thorough understanding of the composite nature of progenitor populations. Recent studies employing novel flow cytometric and cell-based assays have helped to redefine hematopoiesis, and suggest that erythroid progenitors may arise from different levels of the hematopoietic tree. Moreover, the identification of cell surface marker patterns in human burst-forming unit-erythroid and colony-forming unit-erythroid enhance our ability to perform downstream functional and molecular analyses at the population and single cell level. Advances in these techniques have already revealed novel subpopulations with increased self-renewing capacity, roles for erythroid progenitors in globin gene expression, and insights into pharmacologic mechanisms of glucocorticoids and pomalidomide. SUMMARY: Immunophenotypic and molecular characterization resolves the diversity of erythroid progenitors, and may ultimately lead to the ability to target these progenitors to ameliorate diseases of dyserythropoiesis.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The erythroid progenitors burst-forming unit-erythroid and colony-forming unit-erythroid have a critical role in erythropoiesis. These cells represent a heterogeneous and poorly characterized population with modifiable self-renewal, proliferation and differentiation capabilities. This review focuses on the current state of erythroid progenitor biology with regard to immunophenotypic identification and regulatory programs. In addition, we will discuss the therapeutic implications of using these erythroid progenitors as pharmacologic targets. RECENT FINDINGS: Erythroid progenitors are classically characterized by the appearance of morphologically defined colonies in semisolid cultures. However, these prior systems preclude a more thorough understanding of the composite nature of progenitor populations. Recent studies employing novel flow cytometric and cell-based assays have helped to redefine hematopoiesis, and suggest that erythroid progenitors may arise from different levels of the hematopoietic tree. Moreover, the identification of cell surface marker patterns in human burst-forming unit-erythroid and colony-forming unit-erythroid enhance our ability to perform downstream functional and molecular analyses at the population and single cell level. Advances in these techniques have already revealed novel subpopulations with increased self-renewing capacity, roles for erythroid progenitors in globin gene expression, and insights into pharmacologic mechanisms of glucocorticoids and pomalidomide. SUMMARY: Immunophenotypic and molecular characterization resolves the diversity of erythroid progenitors, and may ultimately lead to the ability to target these progenitors to ameliorate diseases of dyserythropoiesis.
Authors: Robert C Fisher; William B Slayton; Christopher Chien; Steven M Guthrie; Christopher Bray; Edward W Scott Journal: Leuk Res Date: 2004-01 Impact factor: 3.156
Authors: Zan Huang; Louis C Dore; Zhe Li; Stuart H Orkin; Gang Feng; Simon Lin; John D Crispino Journal: Mol Cell Biol Date: 2009-07-20 Impact factor: 4.272
Authors: Faiyaz Notta; Sasan Zandi; Naoya Takayama; Stephanie Dobson; Olga I Gan; Gavin Wilson; Kerstin B Kaufmann; Jessica McLeod; Elisa Laurenti; Cyrille F Dunant; John D McPherson; Lincoln D Stein; Yigal Dror; John E Dick Journal: Science Date: 2015-11-05 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Leif S Ludwig; Hanna T Gazda; Jennifer C Eng; Stephen W Eichhorn; Prathapan Thiru; Roxanne Ghazvinian; Tracy I George; Jason R Gotlib; Alan H Beggs; Colin A Sieff; Harvey F Lodish; Eric S Lander; Vijay G Sankaran Journal: Nat Med Date: 2014-06-22 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Elena C Brindley; Julien Papoin; Lauren Kennedy; Raymond F Robledo; Steven L Ciciotte; Theodosia A Kalfa; Luanne L Peters; Lionel Blanc Journal: Blood Cells Mol Dis Date: 2020-12-13 Impact factor: 3.039
Authors: Hongxia Yan; Abdullah Ali; Lionel Blanc; Anupama Narla; Joseph M Lane; Erjing Gao; Julien Papoin; John Hale; Christopher D Hillyer; Naomi Taylor; Patrick G Gallagher; Azra Raza; Sandrina Kinet; Narla Mohandas Journal: Am J Hematol Date: 2021-06-03 Impact factor: 13.265
Authors: Ángela Sánchez; Marta C Orizaola; Diego Rodríguez-Muñoz; Ana Aranda; Antonio Castrillo; Susana Alemany Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2020-10-28 Impact factor: 4.379