| Literature DB >> 28098840 |
Valentina Buda1, Minodora Andor2, Adriana Ledeti3, Ionut Ledeti4, Gabriela Vlase5, Titus Vlase6, Carmen Cristescu7, Mirela Voicu8, Liana Suciu9, Mirela Cleopatra Tomescu10.
Abstract
This paper presents the results obtained after studying the thermal stability and decomposition kinetics of perindopril erbumine as a pure active pharmaceutical ingredient as well as a solid pharmaceutical formulation containing the same active pharmaceutical ingredient (API). Since no data were found in the literature regarding the spectroscopic description, thermal behavior, or decomposition kinetics of perindopril, our goal was the evaluation of the compatibility of this antihypertensive agent with the excipients in the tablet under ambient conditions and to study the effect of thermal treatment on the stability of perindopril erbumine. ATR-FTIR (Attenuated Total Reflectance Fourier Transform Infrared) spectroscopy, thermal analysis (thermogravimetric mass curve (TG-thermogravimetry), derivative thermogravimetric mass curve (DTG), and heat flow (HF)) and model-free kinetics were chosen as investigational tools. Since thermal behavior is a simplistic approach in evaluating the thermal stability of pharmaceuticals, in-depth kinetic studies were carried out by classical kinetic methods (Kissinger and ASTM E698) and later with the isoconversional methods of Friedman, Kissinger-Akahira-Sunose and Flynn-Wall-Ozawa. It was shown that the main thermal degradation step of perindopril erbumine is characterized by activation energy between 59 and 69 kJ/mol (depending on the method used), while for the tablet, the values were around 170 kJ/mol. The used excipients (anhydrous colloidal silica, microcrystalline cellulose, lactose, and magnesium stearate) should be used in newly-developed generic solid pharmaceutical formulations, since they contribute to an increased thermal stability of perindopril erbumine.Entities:
Keywords: ASTM E698; comparative stability; decomposition; isoconversional kinetic study; perindopril erbumine; perindopril tert-butylamine; pharmaceutical formulation; thermal stability
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28098840 PMCID: PMC5297797 DOI: 10.3390/ijms18010164
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Figure 1Structural formula of PER (perindopril erbumine dihydrate). The dotted line between the carboxylate moiety and the charged amine suggest the H-bonding interaction in the formation of the binary adduct.
Figure 2ATR-FTIR spectra recorded on spectra range 4000–650 cm−1 in solid state for: (a) perindopril tert-butylamine as the pure active pharmaceutical ingredient (PERas); (b) PERas kept for 24 h in isothermal conditions at 90 °C and (c) a commonly-used generic tablet containing the same active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) as PERas (PERpf). The spectral range 2400–2000 cm−1 was suppressed due to the presence of ATR background bands.
Figure 3Simultaneously-determined TG (thermogravimetric mass curve), DTG (derivative thermogravimetric mass curve), and normalized HF (heat flow) curves in oxidative air atmosphere at β = 5 °C·min−1 for: (a) PERas in the temperature range of 40–400 °C and (b) PERpf in the temperature range of 40–500 °C.
Figure 4Kissinger kinetic method linear plottings for PERas (a) and PERpf (b).
Figure 5ASTM E698 kinetic method linear plottings for PERas (a) and PERpf (b). The different colored dots represent the DTGpeaks at different heating rates.
Activation energy values obtained by Kissinger and ASTM E698 methods.
| Sample | ||
|---|---|---|
| Kissinger | ASTM E698 | |
| PERas | 63.1 | 63.9 |
| PERpf | 174.5 | 151.2 |
Figure 6The progress of reaction vs. temperature for PERas (a) and PERpf (b).
Figure 7Linear plotting of Friedman method at selected heating rates for PERas (a) and PERpf (b).
Evaluation of activation energy (Ea) values vs. conversion degree obtained by the three isoconversional methods and the mean value of Ea.
| Conversion Degree α | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fr | KAS | FWO | Fr | KAS | FWO | |
| 0.05 | 59.6 | 54.1 | 59.2 | 190.6 | 178.2 | 179.3 |
| 0.10 | 60.2 | 54.8 | 60.1 | 194.1 | 176.5 | 177.2 |
| 0.15 | 60.9 | 55.6 | 60.9 | 194.0 | 167.2 | 168.9 |
| 0.20 | 61.2 | 56.0 | 61.4 | 193.9 | 169.5 | 169.7 |
| 0.25 | 62.9 | 56.3 | 61.7 | 186.7 | 169.0 | 171.4 |
| 0.30 | 65.6 | 56.8 | 62.2 | 186.8 | 174.2 | 174.4 |
| 0.35 | 67.0 | 57.5 | 62.9 | 188.2 | 176.0 | 176.5 |
| 0.40 | 67.8 | 57.7 | 63.1 | 176.7 | 176.2 | 177.6 |
| 0.45 | 69.0 | 58.4 | 63.8 | 162.2 | 175.1 | 176.6 |
| 0.50 | 69.9 | 59.1 | 64.5 | 159.5 | 174.0 | 174.4 |
| 0.55 | 71.3 | 59.9 | 65.3 | 167.8 | 173.1 | 173.2 |
| 0.60 | 71.9 | 60.5 | 65.9 | 163.3 | 170.3 | 172.3 |
| 0.65 | 72.6 | 61.3 | 66.7 | 162.9 | 169.9 | 171.4 |
| 0.70 | 74. 1 | 61.9 | 67.3 | 153.4 | 168.5 | 169.8 |
| 0.75 | 74.8 | 62.6 | 68.0 | 153.1 | 166.1 | 167.8 |
| 0.80 | 76.0 | 63.4 | 68.8 | 165.0 | 166.6 | 166.7 |
| 0.85 | 77.9 | 64.2 | 69.6 | 162.7 | 164.7 | 166.2 |
| 0.90 | 79.3 | 65.2 | 70.6 | 155.9 | 164.9 | 164.7 |
| 0.95 | 79.8 | 65.7 | 71.1 | 164.9 | 159.6 | 163.6 |
| 69.3 ± 6.5 | 59.5 ± 3.5 | 64.9 ± 3.5 | 172.7 ± 14.7 | 170.5 ± 4.9 | 171.7 ± 4.5 | |
Figure 8Linear plotting of Flynn-Wall-Ozawa method at selected heating rates for PERas (a) and PERpf (b). The different colored dots represent the DTGpeaks at different heating rates.
Figure 9Linear plotting of Kissinger-Akahira-Sunose method at selected heating rates for PERas (a) and PERpf (b).
Results of parameters obtained from the analysis of TG-DTG and normalized HF curves.
| Samples | Step | Temperature Range/°C | DTGmax/°C | Normalized HF | Δ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PERas | I | 40.0–121.8 | 110.9 | 83.2 | 113.2 | 8.10 |
| II | 121.8–166.9 | 137.4 | 151.2 | 132.3 | 15.54 | |
| III | 166.9–374.9 | 249.6 | 171.5 | 213.1 | 76.36 | |
| PERpf | I | 40.0–171.2 | 108.9 | 70.0 | 110.5 | 5.81 |
| II | 171.2–253.5 | 222.6; 232.3 | 165.8 | 204.7; 216.1 | 21.30 | |
| III | 253.5–298.9 | 277.8 | - | - | 15.60 | |
| IV | 298.9–381.7 | 320.0 | 310.3 | 342.8 | 26.20 | |
| V | 381.7–500.0 | 485.6 | 380.1 | 479.2 | 31.09 | |