Literature DB >> 28098740

Adult Scoliosis Deformity Surgery: Comparison of Outcomes Between One Versus Two Attending Surgeons.

Jaime A Gomez1, Virginie Lafage2, Daniel M Sciubba3, Shay Bess4,5, Gregory M Mundis2, Barthelemy Liabaud2, Regina Hanstein1, Christopher Shaffrey6, Michael Kelly7, Christopher Ames8, Justin S Smith6, Peter G Passias2, Thomas Errico8, Frank Schwab9.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective review of prospectively collected data.
OBJECTIVE: Assess outcomes of adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery performed by one versus two attending surgeons. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: ASD centers have developed two attending teams to improve efficiency; their effects on complications and outcomes have not been reported.
METHODS: Patients with ASD with five or more levels fused and more than 2-year follow-up were included. Estimated blood loss (EBL), length of stay (LOS), operating room (OR) time, complications, quality of life (Health Related Quality of Life), and x-rays were analyzed. Outcomes were compared between one-surgeon (1S) and two-surgeon (2S) centers. A deformity-matched cohort was analyzed.
RESULTS: A total of 188 patients in 1S and 77 in 2S group were included. 2S group patients were older and had worse deformity based on the Scoliosis Research Society-Schwab classification (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in levels fused (P = 0.57), LOS (8.7 vs 8.9 days), OR time (445.9 vs 453.2 min), or EBL (2008 vs 1898 cm; P > 0.05). 2S patients had more three-column osteotomies (3CO; P < 0.001) and used less bone morphogenetic protein 2 (BMP-2; 79.9% vs 15.6%; P < 0.001). The 2S group had fewer intraoperative complications (1.3% vs 11.1%; P = 0.006). Postoperative (6 wk to 2 yr) complications were more frequent in the 2S group (4.8% vs 15.6%; P < 0.002). After matching for deformity, there were no differences in (9.1 vs 10.1 days), OR time (467.8 vs 508.4 min), or EBL (3045 vs 2247 cm; P = 0.217). 2S group used less BMP-2 (20.6% vs 84.8%; P < 0.001), had fewer intraoperative complications (P = 0.015) but postoperative complications due to instrumentation failure/pseudarthrosis were more frequent (P < 0.01).
CONCLUSION: No significant differences were found in LOS, OR time, or EBL between the 1S and 2S groups, even when matching for severity of deformity. 2S group had less BMP-2 use, fewer intraoperative complications but more postoperative complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28098740     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002071

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.241


  3 in total

Review 1.  [A new classification of surgical complications in adult spinal deformity].

Authors:  S Hemmer; H Almansour; W Pepke; M M Innmann; M Akbar
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Bilateral mastectomies: can a co-surgeon technique offer improvements over the single-surgeon method?

Authors:  Melissa Anne Mallory; Constantine Tarabanis; Eric Schneider; Suniti Nimbkar; Mehra Golshan
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2018-04-23       Impact factor: 4.872

3.  The impact of a multispecialty operative team on colorectal cancer surgery: A retrospective study from a would-be medical center in Taiwan.

Authors:  Chih-I Chen; Fu-Cheng Chuang; Hung-Ju Li; Yu-Chi Chen; Hsin-Pao Chen; Kuang-Wen Liu; Yu-Chieh Su; Jian-Han Chen; Hui-Ming Lee
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-08-05       Impact factor: 1.817

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.