| Literature DB >> 28098519 |
Sandra Buratti1, Carl Martin Allwood1, Bodil Karlsson1.
Abstract
In this study, investigating answerability judgments, 123 participants judged whether each of 46 general knowledge questions could currently be answered by themselves, by someone else, or by no one. There were 26 consensus questions (high expected consensus about their answerability) and 20 non-consensus questions. Before each question, half of the participants rated the extent of their knowledge related to the question. Results showed that answering consensus questions compared with non-consensus led to a lower proportion of "No one knows" answers. Moreover, in the knowledge rating condition compared with the control condition, participants choose "No one knows" proportionally less. Participants' ratings of belief in certainty of knowledge were associated with more "Someone else knows" for the non-consensus questions. Moreover, tendency to maximization led to a higher proportion of "Someone else knows" options for the non-consensus questions. Finally, high need for cognition was associated with fewer choices of "Someone else knows."Entities:
Keywords: Answerability judgments; belief in certainty of knowledge; individual differences; maximization; need for cognition
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28098519 DOI: 10.1080/00221309.2016.1258387
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Gen Psychol ISSN: 0022-1309