H E Cullington1, D Bele1, J C Brinton1, S Cooper2, M Daft3, J Harding4, N Hatton5, J Humphries6, M E Lutman7, J Maddocks8, J Maggs9, K Millward10, G O'Donoghue3, S Patel11, K Rajput12, V Salmon13, T Sear14, A Speers15, A Wheeler14, K Wilson2. 1. a University of Southampton Auditory Implant Service , Southampton , UK. 2. b St Thomas' Hospital Hearing Implant Centre , London , UK. 3. c Nottingham Auditory Implant Programme , Nottingham , UK. 4. d Cardiff Paediatric Cochlear Implant Programme , London , UK. 5. e Emmeline Centre , Cambridge , UK. 6. f The Oxford Cochlear Implant Programme , London , UK. 7. g Hearing and Balance Centre, University of Southampton , Southampton , UK. 8. h West of England Paediatric Hearing Implant Programme , Bristol , UK. 9. i The Midlands Children's Hearing Implant Programme , Birmingham , UK. 10. j The Richard Ramsden Centre for Hearing Implants , Manchester , UK. 11. k St George's Hospital Auditory Implant Service , London , UK. 12. l Great Ormond Street Cochlear Implant Programme , London , UK. 13. m North East Cochlear Implant Programme , Middlesbrough , UK. 14. n Royal National Throat Nose and Ear Cochlear Implant Programme , London , UK. 15. o Belfast Regional Cochlear Implant Centre , Belfast , UK.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: This fourteen-centre project used professional rating scales and parent questionnaires to assess longitudinal outcomes in a large non-selected population of children receiving simultaneous and sequential bilateral cochlear implants. METHODS: This was an observational non-randomized service evaluation. Data were collected at four time points: before bilateral cochlear implants or before the sequential implant, one year, two years, and three years after. The measures reported are Categories of Auditory Performance II (CAPII), Speech Intelligibility Rating (SIR), Bilateral Listening Skills Profile (BLSP) and Parent Outcome Profile (POP). RESULTS: Thousand and one children aged from 8 months to almost 18 years were involved, although there were many missing data. In children receiving simultaneous implants after one, two, and three years respectively, median CAP scores were 4, 5, and 6; median SIR were 1, 2, and 3. Three years after receiving simultaneous bilateral cochlear implants, 61% of children were reported to understand conversation without lip-reading and 66% had intelligible speech if the listener concentrated hard. Auditory performance and speech intelligibility were significantly better in female children than males. Parents of children using sequential implants were generally positive about their child's well-being and behaviour since receiving the second device; those who were less positive about well-being changes also generally reported their children less willing to wear the second device. CONCLUSION: Data from 78% of paediatric cochlear implant centres in the United Kingdom provide a real-world picture of outcomes of children with bilateral implants in the UK. This large reference data set can be used to identify children in the lower quartile for targeted intervention.
OBJECTIVES: This fourteen-centre project used professional rating scales and parent questionnaires to assess longitudinal outcomes in a large non-selected population of children receiving simultaneous and sequential bilateral cochlear implants. METHODS: This was an observational non-randomized service evaluation. Data were collected at four time points: before bilateral cochlear implants or before the sequential implant, one year, two years, and three years after. The measures reported are Categories of Auditory Performance II (CAPII), Speech Intelligibility Rating (SIR), Bilateral Listening Skills Profile (BLSP) and Parent Outcome Profile (POP). RESULTS: Thousand and one children aged from 8 months to almost 18 years were involved, although there were many missing data. In children receiving simultaneous implants after one, two, and three years respectively, median CAP scores were 4, 5, and 6; median SIR were 1, 2, and 3. Three years after receiving simultaneous bilateral cochlear implants, 61% of children were reported to understand conversation without lip-reading and 66% had intelligible speech if the listener concentrated hard. Auditory performance and speech intelligibility were significantly better in female children than males. Parents of children using sequential implants were generally positive about their child's well-being and behaviour since receiving the second device; those who were less positive about well-being changes also generally reported their children less willing to wear the second device. CONCLUSION: Data from 78% of paediatric cochlear implant centres in the United Kingdom provide a real-world picture of outcomes of children with bilateral implants in the UK. This large reference data set can be used to identify children in the lower quartile for targeted intervention.
Authors: Sara M Misurelli; Matthew J Goupell; Emily A Burg; Rachael Jocewicz; Alan Kan; Ruth Y Litovsky Journal: Trends Hear Date: 2020 Jan-Dec Impact factor: 3.293