Literature DB >> 2809849

A laboratory and clinical evaluation of three dental luting cements.

P J Knibbs1, A W Walls.   

Abstract

The loss of material from specimens of three luting cements was measured after continuous erosion cycling in the laboratory. The glass ionomer luting cement showed significantly less material loss than the zinc polycarboxylate and zinc phosphate luting cements. Two hundred and fifty restorations cemented with one of the three materials were studied clinically for marginal integrity and retention over 3.5 years. The data were tested using survival analysis. Zinc phosphate cement gave the best clinical performance. Possible explanations for the poor correlation between the findings in the laboratory and clinical study are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2809849     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.1989.tb01367.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Rehabil        ISSN: 0305-182X            Impact factor:   3.837


  2 in total

1.  Post cementation sensitivity evaluation of glass Ionomer, zinc phosphate and resin modified glass Ionomer luting cements under class II inlays: An in vivo comparative study.

Authors:  V Chandrasekhar
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2010-01

2.  Chemical characterization of in vivo aged zinc polycarboxylate dental cements.

Authors:  J M Leloup; S Serraj; B Pauvert; A Térol; B Cluzel; J Margerit
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 3.896

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.