| Literature DB >> 28098231 |
Ghulam Ali1,2, Asad Mehmood1, Heung Yong Ha1,2, Jaehoon Kim3, Kyung Yoon Chung1,2.
Abstract
We report the feasibility of using reducedEntities:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28098231 PMCID: PMC5241664 DOI: 10.1038/srep40910
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Morphological and structural characterization of RGO.
SEM images at (a) low and (b) high magnification. (c) TEM images of the RGO stack. (d) EDS line-profile showing the functional groups on RGO and (e) relative signals of C and O from the EDS line-profile image.
Figure 2Surface and structural characterizations.
(a) Nitrogen adsorption/desorption isotherm; the inset shows the pore size distribution as measured by the BJH model. (b) XRD pattern plotted with respect to Cu-Kα (1.54 Å). XPS spectra of (c) C 1s and (d) O 1s.
Figure 3Structural characterizations.
(a) Raman spectra (D and G bands) of the RGO sample. NEXAFS spectra of (b) the C K-edge and (c) the O K-edge for the RGO powder.
Figure 4Evaluation of electrochemical performance of the RGO cathode.
(a) CV scan at a scan rate of 0.2 mV s−1 in a voltage range of 1.2–4.5 V. (b) Charge-discharge profiles at a current density of 30 mA g−1 in the 1st, 2nd, 30th, and 1000th cycles. (c) Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy analysis of as-fabricated and after 1000th cycles of RGO cathode and the inset shows the circuit diagram, used to calculate the charge-transfer resistance. (d) Cycle stability in a voltage range of 1.2–4.5 V at a current density of 30 mA g−1.
Figure 5Galvanostatic rate performance and charge storage mechanism.
(a) Charge-discharge profiles at variant current densities and (b) the corresponding rate capabilities of RGO cathode at current densities of 15, 75, 150, 300 and 600 mA g−1. (c) Schematic representation of sodium de/insertion into the RGO nanosheets, where sodium atoms are represented in green.