| Literature DB >> 28097137 |
Michał Sarul1, Małgorzata Rutkowska-Gorczyca2, Jerzy Detyna2, Anna Zięty2, Maciej Kawala3, Joanna Antoszewska-Smith1.
Abstract
Introduction and Aim. Exceptional properties of the NiTi archwires may be jeopardized by the oral cavity; thus its long-term effect on the mechanical and physiochemical properties of NiTi archwires was the aim of work. Material and Methods. Study group comprised sixty 0.016 × 0.022 NiTi archwires from the same manufacturer evaluated (group A) after the first 12 weeks of orthodontic treatment. 30 mm long pieces cut off from each wire prior to insertion formed the control group B. Obeying the strict rules of randomization, all samples were subjected to microscopic evaluation and nanoindentation test. Results. Both groups displayed substantial presence of nonmetallic inclusions. Heterogeneity of the structure and its alteration after usage were found in groups B and A, respectively. Conclusions. Long-term, reliable prediction of biomechanics of NiTi wires in vivo is impossible, especially new archwires from the same vendor display different physiochemical properties. Moreover, manufacturers have to decrease contamination in the production process in order to minimize risk of mutual negative influence of nickel-titanium archwires and oral environment.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 28097137 PMCID: PMC5206860 DOI: 10.1155/2016/5268629
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Figure 1Orthodontic wires: location of the specimen at the distal free ends is marked with the circle.
Composition of the study material.
| Group | Nonetched specimen ( | Type of analysis | Etched specimen ( | Type of analysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A (used) | ANE (60) | Microscopic | AE (30) | Microscopic |
| Nanoindentation | ||||
| B (brand, new) | BNE (60) | Microscopic | BE (30) | Microscopic |
| Nanoindentation |
Figure 2Microstructure of etched material (a) used wires with predominant martensitic phase and (b) new wires with fine-grained austenitic structure.
Figure 3The values obtained in group A (used wires) and group B (new wires): (a) nanohardness (HVIT) and (b) E IT.
Results of t-test comparing the average value of nanohardness in groups A and B.
| Group A | Group B | |
|---|---|---|
| HVIT (MPa: mean value ± SD) | 404.62 ± 40.3 | 323.18 ± 8.7 |
|
| 0.03258 | 0.006258 |
|
| −7.01238 | |
|
| 0.00 | |
|
| 44,72 ± 1,0 | 42,73 ± 1.8 |
|
| 0.01246 | 0.00246 |
|
| 3,70801 | |
|
| 0.000996 | |
p: the level of significance, t value: the difference coefficient, and SD: standard deviation.
Figure 4Box plot of nanohardness mean values in group A (used) and group B (new) wires; SE: standard error.