Literature DB >> 28096667

Hyaluronan-modified superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles for bimodal breast cancer imaging and photothermal therapy.

Rui-Meng Yang1, Chao-Ping Fu2, Jin-Zhi Fang1, Xiang-Dong Xu1, Xin-Hua Wei1, Wen-Jie Tang1, Xin-Qing Jiang1, Li-Ming Zhang2.   

Abstract

Theranostic nanoparticles with both imaging and therapeutic abilities are highly promising in successful diagnosis and treatment of the most devastating cancers. In this study, the dual-modal imaging and photothermal effect of hyaluronan (HA)-modified superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (HA-SPIONs), which was developed in a previous study, were investigated for CD44 HA receptor-overexpressing breast cancer in both in vitro and in vivo experiments. Heat is found to be rapidly generated by near-infrared laser range irradiation of HA-SPIONs. When incubated with CD44 HA receptor-overexpressing MDA-MB-231 cells in vitro, HA-SPIONs exhibited significant specific cellular uptake and specific accumulation confirmed by Prussian blue staining. The in vitro and in vivo results of magnetic resonance imaging and photothermal ablation demonstrated that HA-SPIONs exhibited significant negative contrast enhancement on T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging and photothermal effect targeted CD44 HA receptor-overexpressing breast cancer. All these results indicated that HA-SPIONs have great potential for effective diagnosis and treatment of cancer.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bioactive glycosaminoglycan; breast carcinoma; cellular uptake; iron oxide nanoparticles; magnetic resonance imaging; surface functionalization

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28096667      PMCID: PMC5214799          DOI: 10.2147/IJN.S121249

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine        ISSN: 1176-9114


Introduction

In recent years, near-infrared (NIR) laser-induced photothermal therapy (PTT) based on the nanotechnology, which can deliver a specific amount of photoenergy directly into the tumor site to increase treatment efficiency and meanwhile minimize the damage to the surrounding healthy tissues, has emerged as an appealing and minimally invasive therapeutic strategy for cancer treatment. Noble metal-based nanostructures, such as gold nanospheres,1,2 gold nanorods,3,4 gold nanoshells,5 gold nanocages,6 Cu-based semiconductor nanoparticles,7 and carbon nanotubes8 are the chief nanomaterials that have been well prepared and demonstrated powerful NIR laser-induced PTT efficacy. However, their promising clinical applications were largely limited due to the innate toxicity and unknown long-term toxicity of these aforementioned PTT agents. Superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPIONs), which possess unique properties including non-toxicity, magnetic properties, chemical stability, and biocompatibility,9–11 have also been recently discovered to have photothermal effect and therefore could be used as an alternative PTT material.9,12–15 Chen et al14 reported that the highly crystallized iron oxide nanoparticles administered through the tail vein for PTT as effective and biodegradable mediators. These injected nanoparticles are likely to be applied for PTT as a result of the enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect and is cleared from the body through urinary excretion without long-term toxicity. As already known, SPIONs were also used in clinical studies as an excellent T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) contrast agent. Hence, SPIONs basis theranostic agent, which could combine diagnostic MRI and NIR laser-induced PTT therapeutic capabilities into one single entity, would be a great value for optimal medical outcome.16–18 However, in many cases, nanoparticles are simultaneously transferred to the reticuloendothelial system (RES) of liver and spleen, thus significantly reducing their treatment efficiency on tumor cells. Therefore, there has been a growing demand to develop various tumor-targeted SPIONs systems for the PTT and MRI of tumor sites. A previous study19 developed a modified SPIONs naturally occurring glycosaminoglycan (hyaluronic acid, HA), with specific biological recognition to human cancers overexpressing CD44 HA receptors, and this study set out to evaluate the MRI ability and photothermal effect of HA-SPIONs which the previous study had developed for targeted breast cancer to investigate its possibility to be used as a theranostic agent. For this purpose, the photothermal conversion effect was initially studied on dry HA-modified SPIONs powders. Then, HA-modified SPIONs were applied on CD44 HA receptors overexpressing MDA-MB-231 breast tumor cells to investigate the specific cellular uptake. Additionally, MRI and photothermal efficacy of HA-modified SPIONs were investigated with in vitro and in vivo experiments.

Experimental section

Materials

Ferric chloride hexahydrate (FeCl3·6H2O), ferrous sulfate (FeSO4), ammonium hydroxide, 1-ethyl-3-[3-(dimethylamino)-propyl]carbodiimide, N-hydroxysuccinimide, and fluorescein isothiocyanate were purchased from Aladdin Reagent Database Inc. (Shanghai, China). HA (MW 320 kDa) was purchased from Freda Biochem Co., Ltd. (Shandong, China). 3-Aminopropyltrimethoxysilane (APTMS, pH 7.4) was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St Louis, MO). Fetal bovine serum (FBS, 10%), Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM) were purchased from Hyclone/Thermo Scientific (Waltham, MA, USA). All other chemicals and reagents were of analytical grade.

Cell culture

MDA-MB-231 cells, purchased from Land Biology Technology Company Co., Ltd. (Guangzhou, Guangdong, China), were cultured in DMEM supplemented with 10% of FBS, antibiotics (100 μg/mL streptomycin and 100 U/mL penicillin) at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere with 5% of CO2. Cells were both harvested by the use of trypsin and re-suspended in a fresh complete medium before plating.

Animals

All animal experiments were performed under ethical approval from and in agreement with the guidelines of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Ethics Committee of Sun Yat-sen University and also in accordance with the policy of the National Ministry of Health. Tumors were induced by subcutaneous injection of MDA-MB-231 cells (1×107 cells per mouse) into the right flank of BALB/c female nude mice (4–5 weeks, 18–20 g).

Synthesis of HA-SPIONs

The hyaluronan-targeted SPIONs were synthesized according to the method of Yang et al19 by the chemical conjugation of hyaluronan, as reported in a recent publication.

Measurements of photothermal conversion effect

The dry powders obtained (10 mg) were placed on the parafilm (Polysciences Inc, Warrington, USA; thickness: 0.127 mm). Lasers (Xi’an Minghui Optoelectronics Tech. Co., Ltd., Xi’an, China) with wavelength of 808 nm (power density, 1 W/cm2; spot area, 10×8 mm) were used to irradiate the nanoparticle powders through the parafilm at room temperature. As a control, the parafilm was irradiated with the same lasers as described earlier. To accurately monitor the temperature changes in samples upon laser irradiation, the SPIONs and HA-SPIONs powders were dissolved in water (10 mL) in a round-bottomed flask to get the nanoparticle aqueous suspension of different concentrations (10 mL, 100–500 μg/mL). The 808 nm lasers were then used to irradiate the solutions for 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, or 9 min, respectively. As controls, the temperatures of distilled water irradiated by the same laser as described earlier were measured. All the experiments were conducted in triplicate.

In vitro cellular uptake studies – Perl’s Prussian blue staining

MDA-MB-231 cells at a density of 5×105 cells/well were seeded onto the 12-well plate and incubated for 24 h, and 1 mL of the DMEM containing SPIONs or HA-SPIONs (Fe concentration was fixed to be 40 μg/mL) were added and incubated at 37°C for 24 h. Then Perl’s Prussian blue staining assay was performed according to the method which was published earlier.19 The wells without SPIONs or HA-SPIONs were used as control. Perl’s Prussian blue staining images were taken on an Olympus BX51 optical microscope (Olympus Corp, Tokyo, Japan).

In vitro MRI of MDA-MB-231 cells internalized with nanoparticles

In vitro MRI was performed with MDA-MB-231 cells after incubation with SPION or HA-SPION nanoparticle at the same Fe concentrations (40 μg/mL) for 24 h. After rinsing with PBS, the cells were trypsinized and counted. 1×104, 1×105, or 1×106 cells/well were placed into 2 mL Eppendorf tubes. After centrifugation and resuspension in 1 mL PBS (containing 0.5% agarose), the Eppendorf tubes were placed into a 3.0 T MRI scanner (Verio, Siemens, Erlangen, Germany) at room temperature for MRI. T2 mapping sequence (TR: 1,000 ms, TE: 13.8/27.6/41.4/55.2/69.0 ms, flip angle: 180°, slice thickness: 3.0 mm, matrix 444×448) was used to measure T2 transverse relaxation time.

In vitro photothermal ablation of tumor cells

The MDA-MB-231 cells with a density of 1×105 per well were seeded into a 12-well plate and incubated with DMEM containing HA-SPIONs (200 μg Fe/mL) at 37°C. After 24 h of incubation, cells were washed three times with PBS and irradiated with the 808-nm NIR laser at an output power density of 2 W/cm2 for 10 min. Then, the cells were stained with calcein AM (calcein acetoxymethyl ester) and propidium iodide (PI) to verify the photothermal effect on cancer cells. In addition, MDA-MB-231 cells were stained with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) for 15 min and then imaged through Olympus IX-71 optical microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan).

In vitro photothermal toxicity of HA-SPIONs

MDA-MB-231 cells (1×104 cells per well) were seeded in 96-well plates and incubated for 24 h to allow for cell adhesion, and then the medium was replaced with serum-free medium containing various concentrations of HA-SPIONs. After further 24 h of incubation, the cells were washed three times with PBS, and the medium was replaced with DMEM. The cells were then irradiated by an 808-nm NIR laser with an intensity of 2 W/cm2 for 10 min, while cells without irradiation were used as control. The cell viabilities were determined 1 h after photothermal treatment using the methyl thiazolyl tetrazolium (MTT) assay. Briefly speaking, 20 μL of MTT (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) in a concentration of 5 mg/mL was added to each well and then the cells were incubated for another 4 h at 37°C. Finally, formazan crystals were solubilized by 150 μL of dimethyl sulphoxide, and the absorbance was measured with an ELX 800 microplate reader (BioTek, Winooski, VT, USA) at a wavelength of 490 nm. Cell viability was calculated and compared with the untreated control. It was determined from the ratio of absorbance values for irradiated cells to those for “MDA-MB-231 cells + HA-SPIONs” non-irradiated cells.

In vivo tumor MRI

In vivo MRI was performed using a 3.0 T MRI scanner (Verio; Siemens, Erlangen, Germany) equipped with a soft coil at room temperature. Tumor-bearing mice were imaged using a spin echo sequence (TR =4,500 ms, TE =82 ms, matrix size =256×256, thickness =2 mm). Images were taken before and after tail vein injection of HA-SPIONs at different time points. T2-weighted images were analyzed using a program developed in MATLAB®.

In vivo PTT

A total of 24 mice with similar sized tumor (length ≈ width ≈1 cm) were selected for PTT. The tumor-bearing mice were divided into six groups, namely blank control, laser only, SPIONs only, HA-SPIONs only, SPIONs + laser, and HA-SPIONs + laser groups. For magnetic NP group, mice were injected with SPIONs or HA-SPIONs (20 mg/kg body weight) through tail vein. Mice without any treatment were blank control group. In the three irradiation groups, tumors were irradiated with the 808 nm NIR laser at a power density of 2 W/cm2 for 10 min every 24 h for 8 days after injection. The remaining three groups were not laser irradiated. The tumor morphologies were recorded with a digital color camera during the treatment. The tumor sizes were measured at the widest width and along the perpendicular length using a caliper, and they were calculated using the formula tumor volume = (tumor length) × (tumor width)2/2.

Histological analysis of tumor tissues

All the mice were killed, and the tumors were resected 12 days after the injection of nanoparticles. Tumor tissue blocks were then processed through graded alcohols and embedded in paraffin. All paraffin-fixed blocks were sectioned from the center at a thickness of 4 μm. Sections of tumor tissue were placed onto glass slides and terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase biotin-dUTP nick-end labeling (TUNEL assay) was performed with ApopTag Apoptosis Kit (Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA) to analyze apoptotic cells according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Images of the tissue sections were obtained through Olympus IX-71 optical microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan).

Results and discussion

Measurement of photothermal conversion effect

The photothermal conversion effect was initially studied on dry SPIONs and HA-SPIONs powders, which were placed on the parafilm. Lasers of wavelength 808 nm (power density, 1 W/cm2; spot area, 10×8 mm) were used to irradiate the nanoparticle powders through the parafilm at room temperature as schematically shown in Figure 1. As control, the parafilm was irradiated with the same lasers as described earlier. Upon laser irradiation, the dry powder generates sufficient heat and rapidly burns out a considerable area of the parafilm that is directly in contact with the powder within ~30 s (Figure 1). Obvious differences in photothermal effects were not found in SPIONs and HA-SPIONs. These results indicated sufficient photothermal effects of SPIONs and HA-SPIONs activated by NIR laser irradiation.
Figure 1

Photothermal effect of HA-SPION dry powder and its solution induced by 808 nm laser irradiation.

Abbreviation: HA-SPION, hyaluronan-modified superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticle.

The NIR absorbance of SPIONs allowed for effective photothermal heating of solutions with low concentrations of HA-SPIONs. At low HA-SPION concentration, ~100 μg/mL, rapid photothermal heating occurred upon irradiation by a low power 808 nm laser at 1 W/cm2 (Figure 2B). Temperatures above the photoablation limit of 40°C were readily reached within 10 min of irradiation. In contrast, under the same concentration and laser irradiation, a solution of SPIONs can reach the same temperature (Figure 2A). Both the SPIONs and HA-SPIONs solutions exhibited a concentration-dependent photothermal heating effect.
Figure 2

Photothermal effect of SPIONs (A) and HA-SPIONs (B) at different concentrations (100, 200, and 500 μg/mL) in aqueous solution under NIR laser irradiation (808 nm, 1 W/cm2) compared with the distilled water.

Abbreviations: HA-SPION, hyaluronan-modified superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticle; NIR, near-infrared.

The relevance of the prepared HA-SPIONs as a successful candidate for multifunctional nanoprobes is also dependent on the delivery of the magnetic materials inside cellular environment.20 Hence, internalization of the HA-SPIONs was confirmed by Prussian blue staining, a method that gives a characteristic blue color in the presence of ferric ions. The results of the staining studies indicate that the intracellular presence of Fe3O4 can be visualized by the positive blue spots in MDA-MB-231 cells (Figure 3C). However, similar staining studies on MDA-MB-231 cells with the treatment of SPIONs did not result in any blue spots (Figure 3B). Furthermore, control studies with untreated cells did not result in any positive blue spots (Figure 3A). These results showed receptor-mediated endocytosis, especially an interaction between HA and CD44 HA receptors, identified as the principal cellular uptake mechanism of the HA-based self-assembled nanoparticle.
Figure 3

Prussian blue staining images (×400) of MDA-MB-231 cells; MDA-MB-231 cells only (A), MDA-MB-231 cells after 24 h of incubation with SPIONs (B), and MDA-MB-231 cells after 24 h of incubation with HA-SPIONs (C).

Abbreviation: HA-SPION, hyaluronan-modified superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticle.

The MDA-MB-231 cell labeling by SPIONs or HA-SPIONs was confirmed by MRI. From the MR image of MDA-MB-231 cells with internalized HA-SPIONs (Figure 4), T2 transverse relax times were significantly decreased in HA-SPION-treated cell pellets, compared with that of those treated with SPIONs. It was consistent with the results of in vitro cellular uptake Perl’s Prussian blue staining studies. The results indicated that SPIONs were difficult for MDA-MB-231 cells to internalize, and further suggested that HA-SPIONs could be used as a diagnostic T2-negative MRI contrast agent targeted for CD44 HA-receptor overexpressing MDA-MB-231 breast tumor cells.
Figure 4

T2 mapping MR image of pellets of MDA-MB-231 cells after incubation with SPIONs or HA-SPIONs for 24 h. The cell number in each Eppendorf tube was 1×104, 1×105, or 1×106, respectively.

Abbreviations: HA-SPION, hyaluronan-modified superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticle; MR, magnetic resonance.

To verify the visible photothermal ablation effect of HA-SPIONs on cell viability, viable cells staining with calcein AM and dead cells staining with PI were performed using fluorescence microscopy in this study. After laser exposure of 2 W/cm2 for 10 min, only the HA-SPION-combined laser group (Figure 5A, image d) showed faint red fluorescent region indicating the dead cells that underwent photothermal destruction. In comparison, other samples (Figure 5A, images a–c) showed green color in the entire area, suggesting that HA-SPIONs only or a NIR laser only would not induce cell death. This result indicated that HA-SPIONs would cause cell death through photothermal effects combined with NIR laser irradiation. In addition, DAPI staining has confirmed the observation of this study. Obvious karyorrhexis, karyopyknosis, and karyolysis could only be seen in the group of HA-SPION-combined laser treatment (Figure 5B, image d) compared with the other groups (Figure 5B, images a–c). These results also demonstrated that tumor cell deaths may not have been influenced solely by magnetic nanoparticle application or laser irradiation.
Figure 5

Fluorescence images of calcein AM + PI stained (A) and DAPI stained (B) MDA-MB-231 cells upon different experimental conditions: (a) control; (b) NIR laser (808 nm, 2 W/cm2) treatment only; (c) HA-SPIONs only; and (d) HA-SPIONs combined with NIR laser treatments.

Abbreviations: HA-SPION, hyaluronan-modified superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticle; PI, propidium iodide; DAPI, 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole; NIR, near-infrared.

In order to further investigate the in vitro photothermal cytotoxicity of HA-SPIONs, cell viability for MDA-MB-231 cells incubated with HA-SPIONs of different concentrations with or without laser irradiation was determined by the standard MTT assay. After incubation with increasing concentrations of HA-SPIONs, cell viability was accordingly inhibited after exposure of NIR laser irradiation (Figure 6). However, cell viability of MDA-MB-231 cells was not inhibited as expected without laser irradiation. This result also demonstrated that the HA-SPIONs could localize and kill the tumor cells effectively through photothermal effects in vitro.
Figure 6

Cell viability after treatment with different concentrations of HA-SPIONs with or without NIR laser exposure.

Abbreviations: HA-SPION, hyaluronan-modified superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticle; NIR, near-infrared.

In vivo MRI

In vivo tumor-targeted MRI capability of HA-SPIONs as a T2-weighted MR contrast agent was investigated using MDA-MB-231 tumor-bearing mice (Figure 7). HA-SPIONs generated significantly negative contrast enhancement in tumor tissues, resulting in darkening of the tumor site on T2-weighted MR images by shortening the transverse relaxation time T2 of surrounding water protons. T2-weighted MR signals at the tumor site gradually decreased, reaching the maximal negative contrast enhancement of ~40% at 90 min post-injection. After 24 h post-injection, the whole tumor area was observed mildly darker than that before administration, suggesting that part of HA-SPIONs still remains at the tumor site. These results demonstrated that HA-SPIONs could be used for targeted MRI of MDA-MB-231 tumors in vivo.
Figure 7

T2-weighted MR images of MDA-MB-231 tumor (areas in red circle) bearing mice before and after intravenous injection with HA-SPIONs.

Abbreviations: HA-SPION, hyaluronan-modified superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticle; MR, magnetic resonance.

Further in vivo PTT was investigated using HA-SPIONs on female nude mouse xenograft models. As shown in Figure 8, the growth of mice tumors were significantly suppressed after injected with SPIONs or HA-SPIONs, followed by irradiation with the laser. In contrast, mice tumors in blank control, laser only, SPIONs only, and HA-SPIONs only groups grew markedly over time.
Figure 8

Tumor growth curves with and without laser irradiation treatment.

Abbreviation: HA-SPION, hyaluronan-modified superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticle.

In addition, as exhibited in Figure 9, a charring spot appears on the tumor site in SPIONs + laser and HA-SPIONs + laser groups, indicating hemorrhage caused by photothermal heat generated by the Fe3O4 nanoparticles. Moreover, tumors in the HA-SPIONs + laser group exhibited more significant effect of PTT than SPIONs group, leaving black scars at the original tumor sites without reoccurrence. The results indicated that HA-SPIONs + laser group displayed more effective photothermal ablation via active targeting of CD44 HA receptor than SPIONs + laser group via passive tumor targeting the so-called EPR effect. However, no dark spots were observed in any tumor site in blank control, laser only, SPIONs only and HA-SPIONs only groups. These results clearly showed evidence of tumor growth inhibition by magnetic NP PTT, and the tumor growth could not be affected by either magnetic NPs or laser irradiation. Thus, PTT is a promising approach for MRI-guided tumor ablation.
Figure 9

Representative photographs of tumors with and without laser irradiation.

Abbreviation: HA-SPION, hyaluronan-modified superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticle.

Tumor-bearing mice injected with PBS or magnetic NPs with and without laser NIR irradiation were examined. The apoptosis of tumor cells induced by photothermal effect of magnetic NPs was confirmed by TUNEL assays. Generally, the apoptotic cells were stained brown, whereas the robust and viable cells stained blue. Many cells of the mouse tumor injected with the magnetic NPs exhibited brown staining after laser irradiation, which indicated dead or apoptotic cells (Figure 10). Therefore, the growth of tumors synchronously treated with magnetic NPs combined with laser irradiation was clearly inhibited. Interestingly, magnetic NPs combined with laser irradiation treatment showed higher damaged cells in HA-SPION group due to active targeting of CD44 HA receptor than SPIONs group, which is consistent with in vivo PTT results. However, the cells of mouse without laser irradiation showed blue staining, which indicated that these cells were not affected.
Figure 10

TUNEL-stained images of tumor tissues upon different experimental conditions: (A) control; (B) SPIONs only; (C) HA-SPIONs only; (D) laser only; (E) SPIONs combined with NIR laser treatments; and (F) HA-SPIONs combined with NIR laser treatments.

Abbreviations: HA-SPION, hyaluronan-modified superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticle; NIR, near-infrared; TUNEL, terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase biotin-dUTP nick-end labeling.

Histology analysis of tumor tissues further demonstrated that the tumor cells are significantly destroyed by the HA-SPION laser irradiation treatment.

Conclusion

In the current study, HA-SPIONs exhibited exquisite ability to targeted MRI and highly effective PTT induced by near-infrared laser irradiation for CD44 HA receptors highly expressing breast cancer in both in vitro and in vivo studies. The photothermal effect of magnetic iron oxide may be well utilized as an efficient strategy in clinical cancer theranostic field.
  17 in total

1.  A bimodal molecular imaging probe based on chitosan encapsulated magneto-fluorescent nanocomposite offers biocompatibility, visualization of specific cancer cells in vitro and lung tissues in vivo.

Authors:  Shanka Walia; Supriya Sharma; Pankaj Markand Kulurkar; Vikram Patial; Amitabha Acharya
Journal:  Int J Pharm       Date:  2015-12-08       Impact factor: 5.875

2.  Immunotargeted nanoshells for integrated cancer imaging and therapy.

Authors:  Christopher Loo; Amanda Lowery; Naomi Halas; Jennifer West; Rebekah Drezek
Journal:  Nano Lett       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 11.189

3.  Multifunctional magnetic-hollow gold nanospheres for bimodal cancer cell imaging and photothermal therapy.

Authors:  Ling-Yu Bai; Xiao-Quan Yang; Jie An; Lin Zhang; Kai Zhao; Meng-Yao Qin; Bi-Yun Fang; Cheng Li; Yang Xuan; Xiao-Shuai Zhang; Yuan-Di Zhao; Zhi-Ya Ma
Journal:  Nanotechnology       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 3.874

4.  Carbon nanotubes as multifunctional biological transporters and near-infrared agents for selective cancer cell destruction.

Authors:  Nadine Wong Shi Kam; Michael O'Connell; Jeffrey A Wisdom; Hongjie Dai
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-08-08       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Magnetic nanoparticle clusters for photothermal therapy with near-infrared irradiation.

Authors:  Shun Shen; Sheng Wang; Rui Zheng; Xiaoyan Zhu; Xinguo Jiang; Deliang Fu; Wuli Yang
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2014-11-15       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 6.  Nanoparticle-based theranostic agents.

Authors:  Jin Xie; Seulki Lee; Xiaoyuan Chen
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2010-08-04       Impact factor: 15.470

7.  A chelator-free multifunctional [64Cu]CuS nanoparticle platform for simultaneous micro-PET/CT imaging and photothermal ablation therapy.

Authors:  Min Zhou; Rui Zhang; Miao Huang; Wei Lu; Shaoli Song; Marites P Melancon; Mei Tian; Dong Liang; Chun Li
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 15.419

8.  Glycosaminoglycan-targeted iron oxide nanoparticles for magnetic resonance imaging of liver carcinoma.

Authors:  Rui-Meng Yang; Chao-Ping Fu; Nan-Nan Li; Li Wang; Xiang-Dong Xu; Ding-Yan Yang; Jin-Zhi Fang; Xin-Qing Jiang; Li-Ming Zhang
Journal:  Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 7.328

9.  Photothermal effects and toxicity of Fe3O4 nanoparticles via near infrared laser irradiation for cancer therapy.

Authors:  Andrew W Dunn; Sadat M Ehsan; David Mast; Giovanni M Pauletti; Hong Xu; Jiaming Zhang; Rodney C Ewing; Donglu Shi
Journal:  Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 7.328

10.  Biocompatible PEGylated Fe₃O₄ nanoparticles as photothermal agents for near-infrared light modulated cancer therapy.

Authors:  Gang Yuan; Yongjie Yuan; Kan Xu; Qi Luo
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2014-10-17       Impact factor: 5.923

View more
  20 in total

1.  Decorated Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide Nanoparticles with Monoclonal Antibody and Diethylene-Triamine-Pentaacetic Acid Labeled with Thechnetium-99m and Galium-68 for Breast Cancer Imaging.

Authors:  Marta de Souza Albernaz; Sergio Hiroshi Toma; Jeff Clanton; Koiti Araki; Ralph Santos-Oliveira
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 2.  Nano-engineered delivery systems for cancer imaging and therapy: Recent advances, future direction and patent evaluation.

Authors:  Ghazal Nabil; Ketki Bhise; Samaresh Sau; Mohamed Atef; Hossny A El-Banna; Arun K Iyer
Journal:  Drug Discov Today       Date:  2018-08-16       Impact factor: 7.851

Review 3.  New Frontiers in Molecular Imaging with Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide Nanoparticles (SPIONs): Efficacy, Toxicity, and Future Applications.

Authors:  Viviana Frantellizzi; Miriam Conte; Mariano Pontico; Arianna Pani; Roberto Pani; Giuseppe De Vincentis
Journal:  Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2020-02-08

4.  Theranostic Nanoparticles with Aggregation-Induced Emission and MRI Contrast Enhancement Characteristics as a Dual-Modal Imaging Platform for Image-Guided Tumor Photodynamic Therapy.

Authors:  Huikang Yang; Yufang He; Yan Wang; Li-Ming Zhang; Ruimeng Yang; Nianhua Wang; Meng Gao; Xinqing Jiang
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2020-04-30

Review 5.  Nanoparticles as Theranostic Vehicles in Experimental and Clinical Applications-Focus on Prostate and Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Jörgen Elgqvist
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2017-05-20       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 6.  Strategies on Nanodiagnostics and Nanotherapies of the Three Common Cancers.

Authors:  Fan Leng; Fang Liu; Yongtao Yang; Yu Wu; Weiqun Tian
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2018-03-28       Impact factor: 5.076

Review 7.  Iron Oxide Nanoparticles in Photothermal Therapy.

Authors:  Joan Estelrich; Maria Antònia Busquets
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 4.411

8.  Tailor-made PEG-DA-CuS nanoparticles enriched in tumor with the aid of retro Diels-Alder reaction triggered by their intrinsic photothermal property.

Authors:  Jie Sheng; Beibei Ma; Qian Yang; Chao Zhang; Zhongying Jiang; Entomack Borrathybay
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2018-07-23

Review 9.  Cancer Stem Cells-Origins and Biomarkers: Perspectives for Targeted Personalized Therapies.

Authors:  Lia Walcher; Ann-Kathrin Kistenmacher; Huizhen Suo; Reni Kitte; Sarah Dluczek; Alexander Strauß; André-René Blaudszun; Tetyana Yevsa; Stephan Fricke; Uta Kossatz-Boehlert
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2020-08-07       Impact factor: 7.561

10.  Tri-block polymer with interfacial layer formation ability and its use in maintaining supersaturated drug solution after dissolution of solid dispersions.

Authors:  Ji-Jun Fu; Cheng-Cheng Liu
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2018-03-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.