| Literature DB >> 28096612 |
Jitendra Kumar Paswan1, Kaushalendra Kumar1, Sanjay Kumar1, Abhishek Kumar1, Deepak Kumar2, Ajit Kumar3.
Abstract
AIM: This study was conducted to observe the effect of feeding Acacia nilotica pod meal on hematobiochemical profile and gastrointestinal parasitic load in growing goats.Entities:
Keywords: Acacia nilotica; Haemonchus; goats; hematology; serum
Year: 2016 PMID: 28096612 PMCID: PMC5234054 DOI: 10.14202/vetworld.2016.1400-1406
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Vet World ISSN: 0972-8988
Chemical composition (%, DM) of feed stuffs used in the study.
| Attributes | Concentrate mixture | Sorghum fodder | |
|---|---|---|---|
| DM | 95.69 | 94.18 | 94.94 |
| OM | 90.23 | 94.21 | 86.53 |
| CP | 20.27 | 17.34 | 6.53 |
| EE | 3.12 | 4.15 | 3.63 |
| CF | 5.72 | 15.32 | 30.84 |
| Ash | 9.77 | 5.79 | 13.47 |
| NFE | 61.12 | 57.40 | 37.53 |
| NDF | 42.47 | 34.56 | 65.98 |
| ADF | 13.06 | 28.25 | 40.34 |
| ADL | 1.87 | 2.32 | 14.34 |
| Hemi cellulose | 29.41 | 6.31 | 25.64 |
| Cellulose | 11.19 | 25.93 | 26.00 |
| Phenolic constituents | |||
| Total phenolics | - | 22.45 | - |
| Total tannin phenolics | - | 19.09 | - |
| Non-tannin phenolics | - | 3.36 | - |
| CTs | - | 1.94 | - |
| HTs | - | 17.15 | - |
A. nilotica=Acacia nilotica, DM=Dry matter, OM=Organic matter, CP=Crude protein, EE=Ether extract, CF=Crude fiber, TA=Total ash, NFE=Nitrogen free extract, NDF=Neutral detergent fiber, ADF=Acid detergent fiber, ADL=Acid detergent lignin, CT=Condensed tannin, HT=Hydrolysable tannins
Effect of feeding A. nilotica pod meal on whole blood parameters of goats.
| Attributes | Control | T1 | T2 | T3 | p value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hb (g/dl) | 10.6±0.83[ | 10.2±0.30[ | 11.7±0.11[ | 11.9±0.13[ | 0.088 |
| PCV (%) | 31.5±1.83 | 31.2±0.94 | 34.3±0.13 | 33.5±0.42 | 0.179 |
| RBC (×106 µL) | 5.25±0.30 | 5.20±0.16 | 5.72±0.02 | 5.59±0.07 | 0.178 |
| MCV (fL) | 60.7±1.21[ | 59.0±1.53[ | 61.3±0.80[ | 63.7±0.66[ | 0.090 |
| MCH (pg) | 20.2±0.40[ | 19.7±0.51[ | 20.5±0.27[ | 21.3±0.22[ | 0.090 |
| MCHC (g/dl) | 33.7±0.67[ | 32.8±0.85[ | 34.0±0.44[ | 35.4±0.37[ | 0.090 |
| Neutrophil (%) | 31.0±2.08[ | 36.7±1.20[ | 32.3±0.88[ | 33.0±1.73[ | 0.137 |
| Lymphocyte (%) | 54.7±2.60[ | 51.3±1.76[ | 60.3±1.20[ | 62.3±0.88[ | 0.007 |
| Monocyte (%) | 1.67±0.33 | 1.67±0.33 | 2.67±0.88 | 1.67±0.33 | 0.482 |
| Eosinophil (%) | 2.00±1.00 | 1.00±0.00 | 1.67±0.33 | 0.67±0.33 | 0.366 |
| Basophil (%) | 0.67±0.33 | 0.33±0.33 | 0.67±0.33 | 0.33±0.33 | 0.802 |
Values with different superscripts in a row differ significantly (p<0.05). A. nilotica=Acacia nilotica, Hb=Hemoglobin, PCV=Packed cells volume, RBC=Red blood corpuscles, MCV=Mean corpuscular volume, MCH=Mean corpuscular hemoglobin, MCHC=Mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration
Effect of feeding A. nilotica pod meal on blood biochemical profile of goats.
| Attributes | Control | T1 | T2 | T3 | p value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glucose (mg/dl) | 61.0±5.4 | 60.8±4.4 | 64.1±5.9 | 74.5±7.4 | 0.339 |
| Total protein (g/dl) | 6.53±0.28[ | 6.72±0.20[ | 6.99[ | 5.32[ | 0.001 |
| Albumin (g/dl) | 3.28±0.16 | 3.44±0.18 | 3.47±0.21 | 2.93±0.16 | 0.158 |
| Globulin (g/dl) | 3.26±0.34[ | 3.27±0.19[ | 3.52±0.37[ | 2.39±0.30[ | 0.079 |
| A:G ratio | 1.10±0.20 | 1.08±0.12 | 1.07±0.18 | 1.33±0.16 | 0.655 |
| Urea (mg/dl) | 27.5±2.1 | 27.0±2.0 | 25.8±1.6 | 24.1±0.95 | 0.546 |
| BUN (mg/dl) | 12.3±0.94 | 12.0±0.92 | 11.5±0.74 | 10.8±0.42 | 0.547 |
| Uric acid (mg/dl) | 0.72±0.07 | 0.70±0.13 | 0.80±0.07 | 0.79±0.08 | 0.820 |
| Creatinine (mg/dl) | 1.37±0.04[ | 1.08±0.06[ | 1.14±0.02[ | 1.20±0.06[ | 0.002 |
| Calcium (mg/dl) | 10.0±0.24 | 11.4±0.91 | 11.1±0.46 | 11.6±0.29 | 0.213 |
| Phosphorus (mg/dl) | 8.09±0.60 | 8.25±0.29 | 8.02±0.13 | 7.94±0.16 | 0.933 |
| SGOT (U/L) | 179±1.5 | 174±1.9 | 181±4.2 | 177±3.7 | 0.436 |
| SGPT (U/L) | 12.0±0.94 | 14.7±1.5 | 15.2±1.0 | 14.3±1.0 | 0.258 |
| ALP (U/L) | 117±5.2 | 121±4.3 | 125±4.6 | 118±4.1 | 0.604 |
| Cholesterol (mg/dl) | 127±7.5 | 117±9.2 | 121±13.4 | 124±10.0 | 0.914 |
| Triglyceride (mg/dl) | 188±6.6 | 198±13.5 | 212±10.9 | 200±4.4 | 0.381 |
| HDL (mg/dl) | 45.9±6.2 | 46.7±8.1 | 45.5±5.2 | 47.0±4.6 | 0.998 |
| LDL (mg/dl) | 43.0±4.2 | 46.5±10.9 | 46.2±10.3 | 52.2±9.0 | 0.908 |
| VLDL (mg/dl) | 37.6±1.3 | 39.5±2.7 | 42.5±2.2 | 40.0±0.89 | 0.381 |
Values with different superscripts in a row differ significantly (p<0.05, p<0.01). A:G=Albumin:globulin, BUN=Blood urea nitrogen, SGOT=Serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase, SGPT=Serum glutamic pyruvic transaminase, ALP=Alkaline phosphatase, HDL=High density lipoprotein, LDL=Low density lipoprotein, VLDL=Very low density lipoprotein, T1=Treatment 1 (10% A. nilotica pod meal fed group), T2=Treatment 2 (20% A. nilotica pod meal fed group), T3=Treatment 3 (30% A. nilotica pod meal fed group), A. nilotica=Acacia nilotica
Effect of feeding A. nilotica pod meal on fecal egg count and nutrient utilization of goats.
| Attributes | Control | T1 | T2 | T3 | p value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Initial BW (kg) | 7.62±0.74 | 7.55±0.83 | 7.85±0.81 | 7.63±0.69 | 0.993 |
| Final BW (kg) | 10.9±0.81 | 11.2±0.91 | 11.9±0.90 | 10.8±0.79 | 0.759 |
| ADG (g/day) | 36.30±2.16[ | 40.4±2.18[ | 45.6±1.99[ | 34.6±2.23[ | 0.009 |
| Total DMI (g/day) | 357±1.84[ | 363±1.43[ | 367±1.19[ | 357±2.23[ | 0.001 |
| Nitrogen intake (g/day) | 14.7±1.01 | 14.6±1.72 | 16.0±2.29 | 13.5±2.76 | 0.860 |
| Nitrogen outgo (g/day) | 6.77±0.54 | 6.12±1.98 | 5.02±0.94 | 6.66±1.44 | 0.789 |
| Nitrogen balance (g/day) | 7.97±0.47 | 8.42±0.26 | 11.0±3.23 | 6.89±1.33 | 0.488 |
| 658.3±71.2[ | 433.2±21.1[ | 208.4±15.4[ | 125.0±11.2[ | 0.001 | |
| Coccidia (OPG) | 1533.2±238.9[ | 958.3±49.0[ | 683.3±66.7[ | 341.7±39.6[ | 0.001 |
Values with different superscripts in a row differ significantly (p<0.05, p<0.01). BW=Body weight, ADG=Average daily gain, DMI=Dry matter intake, EPG=Eggs per gram, OPG=Oocysts per gram