| Literature DB >> 28096610 |
M Sathiyabarathi1, S Jeyakumar1, A Manimaran1, Heartwin A Pushpadass2, M Sivaram3, K P Ramesha4, D N Das4, Mukund A Kataktalware4, G Jayaprakash5, Tapas Kumar Patbandha6.
Abstract
AIM: The objective of this study was to investigate the ability of infrared thermography (IRT) technique and its interrelationship with conventional mastitis indicators for the early detection of mastitis in Holstein Friesian (HF) crossbred cows.Entities:
Keywords: diagnosis; lactating cows; mastitis; temperature
Year: 2016 PMID: 28096610 PMCID: PMC5234052 DOI: 10.14202/vetworld.2016.1386-1391
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Vet World ISSN: 0972-8988
Figure-1Infrared thermography thermogram of subclinical mastitis-affected Holstein Friesian crossbred cow from the lateral side of udder quarters. LFQ: Left fore quarter, RFQ: Right fore quarter, LHQ: Left hind quarter, RHQ: Right hind quarter. LHQ and RHQ showing increased temperature.
Figure-2Temperature difference between body and udder skin surface of non-mastitis and mastitis affected crossbred cows. BT: Body temperature, USST: Udder skin surface temperature.
Descriptive statistics of the USST (°C); EC (unit); and SCC (lakhs) by CMT score.
| CMT score | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Descriptive measures | Negative (n=57) | Trace (n=11) | One and above (n=8) | ||||||
| USST (°C) | EC (Unit) | SCC (Lakhs) | USST (°C) | EC (Unit) | SCC (Lakhs) | USST (°C) | EC (Unit) | SCC (Lakhs) | |
| Mean | 37.22 | 12.00 | 2.05 | 38.08 | 66.36 | 8.16 | 38.25 | 146.25 | 21.05 |
| SE | 0.01 | 1.56 | 0.19 | 0.05 | 6.91 | 0.31 | 0.12 | 12.81 | 0.95 |
| Median | 37.21 | 10.00 | 2.10 | 38.10 | 60.00 | 7.95 | 38.15 | 145.00 | 21.05 |
| SD | 0.04 | 6.96 | 0.85 | 0.17 | 22.92 | 0.99 | 0.33 | 36.23 | 1.34 |
| Range | 0.17 | 30.00 | 3.00 | 0.50 | 90.00 | 3.20 | 1.00 | 100.00 | 1.90 |
| Minimum | 37.14 | 0.00 | 0.60 | 37.90 | 10.00 | 6.40 | 37.90 | 100.00 | 20.10 |
| Maximum | 37.31 | 30.00 | 3.60 | 38.40 | 100.00 | 9.60 | 38.90 | 200.00 | 22.00 |
USST=Udder skin surface temperature, EC=Electrical conductivity, SCC=Somatic cell count, CMT=California mastitis test, SE=Standard error, SD=Standard deviation
Comparison of body temperature, USST, EC and SCC (mean±SD) of non-mastitis and mastitis-affected HF crossbred cows.
| Condition | BT (°C) | USST (°C) | EC (Unit) | SCC (Lakhs/ml) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Non-mastitis | 37.23±0.08 | 37.22±0.04a | 12.0±6.95a | 2.04±0.85a |
| SCM | 37.22±0.04 | 38.08±0.17b | 58.18±25.65b | 8.16±0.99b |
| Clinical mastitis | 37.22±0.08 | 38.25±0.33c | 146.25±36.22c | 21.05±1.34c |
| p value | 0.712 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Values with different superscripts with in the column differ significantly at p<0.001, BT=Body temperature, USST=Udder skin surface temperature, EC=Electrical conductivity, SCC=Somatic cell count, HF=Holstein Friesian, SD=Standard deviation
Figure-3(a and b) Linear regression relating udder skin surface temperature with electrical conductivity (EC) and somatic cell count (SCC) of subclinical mastitis-affected crossbred cows.
Figure-4Area of udder skin surface temperature under the receiver operating characteristic curve.