Naomi Kakoschke1, Eva Kemps2, Marika Tiggemann2. 1. School of Psychology, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia. Electronic address: Naomi.Kakoschke@flinders.edu.au. 2. School of Psychology, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Continual exposure to food cues in the environment contributes to unhealthy eating behaviour. According to dual-process models, such behaviour is partly determined by automatic processing of unhealthy food cues (e.g., approach bias), which fails to be regulated by controlled processing (e.g., inhibitory control). The current study aimed to investigate the effect of combined avoidance and control training on implicit evaluation (liking), choice, and consumption of unhealthy snack food. METHOD: Participants were 240 undergraduate women who were randomly allocated to one of four experimental conditions of a 2 (avoidance training: training versus control) x 2 (control training: training versus control) between-subjects design. RESULTS: The combined training group had a more negative implicit evaluation of unhealthy food than either of the two training conditions alone or the control condition. In addition, participants trained to avoid unhealthy food cues subsequently made fewer unhealthy snack food choices. No significant group differences were found for food intake. LIMITATIONS: Participants were women generally of a healthy weight. Overweight or obese individuals may derive greater benefit from combined training. CONCLUSIONS: Results lend support to the theoretical predictions of dual-process models, as the combined training reduced implicit liking of unhealthy food. At a practical level, the findings have implications for the effectiveness of interventions targeting unhealthy eating behaviour.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Continual exposure to food cues in the environment contributes to unhealthy eating behaviour. According to dual-process models, such behaviour is partly determined by automatic processing of unhealthy food cues (e.g., approach bias), which fails to be regulated by controlled processing (e.g., inhibitory control). The current study aimed to investigate the effect of combined avoidance and control training on implicit evaluation (liking), choice, and consumption of unhealthy snack food. METHOD:Participants were 240 undergraduate women who were randomly allocated to one of four experimental conditions of a 2 (avoidance training: training versus control) x 2 (control training: training versus control) between-subjects design. RESULTS: The combined training group had a more negative implicit evaluation of unhealthy food than either of the two training conditions alone or the control condition. In addition, participants trained to avoid unhealthy food cues subsequently made fewer unhealthy snack food choices. No significant group differences were found for food intake. LIMITATIONS: Participants were women generally of a healthy weight. Overweight or obese individuals may derive greater benefit from combined training. CONCLUSIONS: Results lend support to the theoretical predictions of dual-process models, as the combined training reduced implicit liking of unhealthy food. At a practical level, the findings have implications for the effectiveness of interventions targeting unhealthy eating behaviour.
Authors: Alison L Miller; Ashley N Gearhardt; Emily M Fredericks; Benjamin Katz; Lilly Fink Shapiro; Kelsie Holden; Niko Kaciroti; Richard Gonzalez; Christine Hunter; Julie C Lumeng Journal: Behav Res Ther Date: 2017-09-28
Authors: Rachel C Adams; Jemma Sedgmond; Leah Maizey; Christopher D Chambers; Natalia S Lawrence Journal: Nutrients Date: 2019-09-04 Impact factor: 5.717
Authors: Lemmy Schakel; Dieuwke S Veldhuijzen; Henriët van Middendorp; Pieter Van Dessel; Jan De Houwer; Rafael Bidarra; Andrea W M Evers Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-07-26 Impact factor: 3.240