Literature DB >> 28095059

What's the Harm? Harms in Research With Adults With Intellectual Disability.

Katherine E McDonald1, Nicole E Conroy1, Robert S Olick2, The Project Ethics Expert Panel3.   

Abstract

Scientific advances can improve the lives of adults with intellectual disability, yet concerns that research participation may impose harm impede scientific progress. What counts as harmful can be subjective and perceptions of harm may vary among stakeholders. We studied perspectives on the harmfulness of research events among adults with intellectual disability, family members and friends, disability service providers, researchers, and Institutional Review Board members. We found considerable variance. For example, adults with intellectual disability see exclusion from research as more harmful, but most psychosocial harms as less significant than others. All stakeholders agree that having someone else make the participation decision is harmful. Findings provide insights into the concept of harm and ethical research with adults with intellectual disability.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adults with intellectual disability; research ethics; research harms

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28095059      PMCID: PMC5568892          DOI: 10.1352/1944-7558-122.1.78

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Intellect Dev Disabil        ISSN: 1944-7558


  27 in total

Review 1.  Ethical challenges in the conduct of research involving persons with mental retardation.

Authors:  R I Freedman
Journal:  Ment Retard       Date:  2001-04

2.  Psychological and social risks of behavioral research.

Authors:  Susan M Labott; Timothy P Johnson
Journal:  IRB       Date:  2004 May-Jun

3.  Gatekeepers of science: attitudes toward the research participation of adults with intellectual disability.

Authors:  Katherine E McDonald; Christopher B Keys; David B Henry
Journal:  Am J Ment Retard       Date:  2008-11

4.  What to tell and how to tell: a qualitative study of information sharing in research for adults with intellectual disability.

Authors:  D Andre-Barron; A Strydom; A Hassiotis
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.903

5.  Perspectives of patients with schizophrenia and psychiatrists regarding ethically important aspects of research participation.

Authors:  L W Roberts; T D Warner; J L Brody
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 18.112

6.  Is It Worth It? Benefits in Research With Adults With Intellectual Disability.

Authors:  Katherine E McDonald; Nicole E Conroy; Robert S Olick
Journal:  Intellect Dev Disabil       Date:  2016-12

Review 7.  Participation in intellectual disability research: a review of 20 years of studies.

Authors:  S Cleaver; H Ouellette-Kuntz; A Sakar
Journal:  J Intellect Disabil Res       Date:  2010-02-08

8.  Where are persons with intellectual disabilities in medical research? A survey of published clinical trials.

Authors:  M A Feldman; J Bosett; C Collet; P Burnham-Riosa
Journal:  J Intellect Disabil Res       Date:  2013-09-03

9.  Assessments by patients with schizophrenia and psychiatrists of relative risk of research procedures.

Authors:  Laura Weiss Roberts; Teddy D Warner; Katherine Green Hammond; Laura B Dunn
Journal:  Psychiatr Serv       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.084

10.  Public preferences and the challenge to genetic research policy.

Authors:  Rebecca Dresser
Journal:  J Law Biosci       Date:  2014-02-04
View more
  8 in total

1.  Is Safety in the Eye of the Beholder? Safeguards in Research With Adults With Intellectual Disability.

Authors:  Katherine E McDonald; Nicole E Conroy; Carolyn I Kim; Emily J LoBraico; Ellis M Prather; Robert S Olick
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2016-07-31       Impact factor: 1.742

2.  Is It Worth It? Benefits in Research With Adults With Intellectual Disability.

Authors:  Katherine E McDonald; Nicole E Conroy; Robert S Olick
Journal:  Intellect Dev Disabil       Date:  2016-12

3.  A quantitative study of attitudes toward the research participation of adults with intellectual disability: Do stakeholders agree?

Authors:  Katherine E McDonald; Nicole E Conroy; Robert S Olick
Journal:  Disabil Health J       Date:  2017-12-13       Impact factor: 2.554

4.  Facilitating the inclusion of adults with intellectual disability as direct respondents in research: Strategies for fostering trust, respect, accessibility and engagement.

Authors:  Katherine E McDonald; Colleen Gibbons; Nicole Conroy; Robert S Olick
Journal:  J Appl Res Intellect Disabil       Date:  2021-09-24

5.  Negative association of perceived risk and willingness to participate in innovative psychiatric research protocols.

Authors:  Tenzin Tsungmey; Jane Paik Kim; Laura B Dunn; Katie Ryan; Kyle Lane-McKinley; Laura Weiss Roberts
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 4.791

Review 6.  Opening the door to university health research: recommendations for increasing accessibility for individuals with intellectual disability.

Authors:  Brittany M St John; Emily Hickey; Edward Kastern; Chad Russell; Tina Russell; Ashley Mathy; Brogan Peterson; Don Wigington; Casey Pellien; Allison Caudill; Libby Hladik; Karla K Ausderau
Journal:  Int J Equity Health       Date:  2022-09-10

7.  A survey study of the attitudes and experiences of adults with intellectual disability regarding participation in research.

Authors:  N E Conroy; K E McDonald; R S Olick
Journal:  J Intellect Disabil Res       Date:  2021-08-09

Review 8.  The Alzheimer's Biomarker Consortium-Down Syndrome: Rationale and methodology.

Authors:  Benjamin L Handen; Ira T Lott; Bradley T Christian; Nicole Schupf; Sid OBryant; Mark Mapstone; Anne M Fagan; Joseph H Lee; Dana Tudorascu; Mei-Cheng Wang; Elizabeth Head; William Klunk; Beau Ances; Florence Lai; Shahid Zaman; Sharon Krinsky-McHale; Adam M Brickman; H Diana Rosas; Annie Cohen; Howard Andrews; Sigan Hartley; Wayne Silverman
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement (Amst)       Date:  2020-08-03
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.