Literature DB >> 28094850

Discriminating solitary cysts from soft tissue lesions in mammography using a pretrained deep convolutional neural network.

Thijs Kooi1, Bram van Ginneken1, Nico Karssemeijer1, Ard den Heeten2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: It is estimated that 7% of women in the western world will develop palpable breast cysts in their lifetime. Even though cysts have been correlated with risk of developing breast cancer, many of them are benign and do not require follow-up. We develop a method to discriminate benign solitary cysts from malignant masses in digital mammography. We think a system like this can have merit in the clinic as a decision aid or complementary to specialized modalities.
METHODS: We employ a deep convolutional neural network (CNN) to classify cyst and mass patches. Deep CNNs have been shown to be powerful classifiers, but need a large amount of training data for which medical problems are often difficult to come by. The key contribution of this paper is that we show good performance can be obtained on a small dataset by pretraining the network on a large dataset of a related task. We subsequently investigate the following: (a) when a mammographic exam is performed, two different views of the same breast are recorded. We investigate the merit of combining the output of the classifier from these two views. (b) We evaluate the importance of the resolution of the patches fed to the network. (c) A method dubbed tissue augmentation is subsequently employed, where we extract normal tissue from normal patches and superimpose this onto the actual samples aiming for a classifier invariant to occluding tissue. (d) We combine the representation extracted using the deep CNN with our previously developed features.
RESULTS: We show that using the proposed deep learning method, an area under the ROC curve (AUC) value of 0.80 can be obtained on a set of benign solitary cysts and malignant mass findings recalled in screening. We find that it works significantly better than our previously developed approach by comparing the AUC of the ROC using bootstrapping. By combining views, the results can be further improved, though this difference was not found to be significant. We find no significant difference between using a resolution of 100 versus 200 micron. The proposed tissue augmentations give a small improvement in performance, but this improvement was also not found to be significant. The final system obtained an AUC of 0.80 with 95% confidence interval [0.78, 0.83], calculated using bootstrapping. The system works best for lesions larger than 27 mm where it obtains an AUC value of 0.87.
CONCLUSION: We have presented a computer-aided diagnosis (CADx) method to discriminate cysts from solid lesion in mammography using features from a deep CNN trained on a large set of mass candidates, obtaining an AUC of 0.80 on a set of diagnostic exams recalled from screening. We believe the system shows great potential and comes close to the performance of recently developed spectral mammography. We think the system can be further improved when more data and computational power becomes available.
© 2017 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  breast cancer; computer aided diagnosis; deep learning; solitary cysts; transfer learning

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28094850     DOI: 10.1002/mp.12110

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  11 in total

Review 1.  Overview of deep learning in medical imaging.

Authors:  Kenji Suzuki
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2017-07-08

Review 2.  Deep learning beyond cats and dogs: recent advances in diagnosing breast cancer with deep neural networks.

Authors:  Jeremy R Burt; Neslisah Torosdagli; Naji Khosravan; Harish RaviPrakash; Aliasghar Mortazi; Fiona Tissavirasingham; Sarfaraz Hussein; Ulas Bagci
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-04-10       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 3.  CAD and AI for breast cancer-recent development and challenges.

Authors:  Heang-Ping Chan; Ravi K Samala; Lubomir M Hadjiiski
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Evaluation of radiologist's knowledge about the Artificial Intelligence in diagnostic radiology: a survey-based study.

Authors:  Abdulrahman Tajaldeen; Salem Alghamdi
Journal:  Acta Radiol Open       Date:  2020-07-31

Review 5.  Artificial intelligence and convolution neural networks assessing mammographic images: a narrative literature review.

Authors:  Dennis Jay Wong; Ziba Gandomkar; Wan-Jing Wu; Guijing Zhang; Wushuang Gao; Xiaoying He; Yunuo Wang; Warren Reed
Journal:  J Med Radiat Sci       Date:  2020-03-05

6.  Differential diagnosis of ameloblastoma and odontogenic keratocyst by machine learning of panoramic radiographs.

Authors:  Zijia Liu; Jiannan Liu; Guangtao Zhai; Jing Han; Zijie Zhou; Qiaoyu Zhang; Hao Wu
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2021-02-06       Impact factor: 2.924

7.  A holistic overview of deep learning approach in medical imaging.

Authors:  Rammah Yousef; Gaurav Gupta; Nabhan Yousef; Manju Khari
Journal:  Multimed Syst       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 2.603

8.  Early Prediction of Cognitive Deficit in Very Preterm Infants Using Brain Structural Connectome With Transfer Learning Enhanced Deep Convolutional Neural Networks.

Authors:  Ming Chen; Hailong Li; Jinghua Wang; Weihong Yuan; Mekbib Altaye; Nehal A Parikh; Lili He
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2020-09-18       Impact factor: 4.677

9.  A multi-task, multi-stage deep transfer learning model for early prediction of neurodevelopment in very preterm infants.

Authors:  Lili He; Hailong Li; Jinghua Wang; Ming Chen; Elveda Gozdas; Jonathan R Dillman; Nehal A Parikh
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Application of deep learning in the detection of breast lesions with four different breast densities.

Authors:  Hongmei Li; Jing Ye; Hao Liu; Yichuan Wang; Binbin Shi; Juan Chen; Aiping Kong; Qing Xu; Junhui Cai
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 4.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.