Francisco M Marty1, Joan Vidal-Puigserver2, Carol Clark3, Sandeep K Gupta4, Esperanza Merino5, Denis Garot6, Marianne J Chapman7, Frédérique Jacobs8, Eduardo Rodriguez-Noriega9, Petr Husa10, Denise Shortino11, Helen A Watson12, Phillip J Yates13, Amanda F Peppercorn14. 1. Division of Infectious Diseases, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. Electronic address: fmarty@bwh.harvard.edu. 2. Servei d'Urgències, Hospital Universitari Son Espases, Palma de Mallorca, Illes Balears, Spain. 3. Department of Emergency Medicine, William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, MI, USA. 4. M V Hospital & Research Centre, Lucknow, India. 5. Hospital General Universitario de Alicante, Alicante, Spain. 6. Service de Réanimation Polyvalente, Hôpital Bretonneau, Tours, France. 7. Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia. 8. Infectious Diseases Department, CUB-Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium. 9. Infectología, Hospital Civil de Guadalajara Fray Antonio Alcalde; Instituto de Patología Infecciosa y Experimental, CUCS, UDG Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico. 10. Department of Infectious Diseases, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University; University Hospital Brno, Czech Republic. 11. PAREXEL International, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA. 12. GlaxoSmithKline, Stockley Park, Middlesex, UK. 13. GlaxoSmithKline, Stevenage, Herts, UK. 14. GlaxoSmithKline, Boston, MA, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND:Neuraminidase inhibitors are effective for the treatment of acute uncomplicated influenza. However, there is an unmet need for intravenous treatment for patients admitted to hospital with severe influenza. We studied whether intravenous zanamivir was a suitable treatment in this setting. METHODS: In this international, randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, phase 3 trial, we recruited patients aged 16 years or older with severe influenza admitted to 97 hospitals from 26 countries. We randomly assigned patients (1:1:1 stratified by symptom onset ≤4 days or 5-6 days) to receive 300 mg or 600 mg intravenous zanamivir, or standard-of-care (75 mg oral oseltamivir) twice a day for 5-10 days; patients were followed up for 28 days. The randomisation schedule, including stratification, was generated using GlaxoSmithKline's RandAll software. Patients, site study staff, and sponsor were masked to study treatment. The primary endpoint was time to clinical response-a composite of vital sign stabilisation and hospital discharge-in the influenza-positive population. The trial was powered to show an improvement of 1·5 days or greater with 600 mg intravenous zanamivir. Pharmacokinetic, safety, and virology endpoints were also assessed. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01231620. FINDINGS:Between Jan 15, 2011, and Feb 12, 2015, 626 patients were randomly assigned to receive 300 mg intravenous zanamivir (n=201), 600 mg intravenous zanamivir (n=209), or 75 mg oral oseltamivir (n=205) twice a day; 11 patients discontinued the study before receiving any study treatment. 488 (78%) of 626 patients had laboratory-confirmed influenza. Compared with a median time to clinical response of 5·14 days in the 600 mg intravenous zanamivir group, the median time to clinical response was 5·87 days (difference of -0·73 days, 95% CI -1·79 to 0·75; p=0·25) in the 300 mg intravenous zanamivir group and 5·63 days (difference of -0·48 days, 95% CI -2·11 to 0·97; p=0·39) in the oseltamivir group. Four patients with influenza A/H1N1pdm09 in the oseltamivir group developed H275Y resistance mutations. Adverse events were reported in 373 (61%) of treated patients and were similar across treatment groups; the most common adverse events (300 mg intravenous zanamivir, 600 mg intravenous zanamivir, oseltamivir) were diarrhoea (10 [5%], 15 [7%], 14 [7%]), respiratory failure (11 [5%], 14 [7%], 11 [5%]), and constipation (7 [3%], 13 [6%], 10 [5%]). 41 (7%) treated patients died during the study (15 [7%], 15 [7%], 11 [5%]); the most common causes of death were respiratory failure and septic shock. INTERPRETATION: Time to clinical response to intravenous zanamivir dosed at 600 mg was not superior to oseltamivir or 300 mg intravenous zanamivir. All treatments had a similar safety profile in hospitalised patients with severe influenza. FUNDING: GlaxoSmithKline.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND:Neuraminidase inhibitors are effective for the treatment of acute uncomplicated influenza. However, there is an unmet need for intravenous treatment for patients admitted to hospital with severe influenza. We studied whether intravenous zanamivir was a suitable treatment in this setting. METHODS: In this international, randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, phase 3 trial, we recruited patients aged 16 years or older with severe influenza admitted to 97 hospitals from 26 countries. We randomly assigned patients (1:1:1 stratified by symptom onset ≤4 days or 5-6 days) to receive 300 mg or 600 mg intravenous zanamivir, or standard-of-care (75 mg oral oseltamivir) twice a day for 5-10 days; patients were followed up for 28 days. The randomisation schedule, including stratification, was generated using GlaxoSmithKline's RandAll software. Patients, site study staff, and sponsor were masked to study treatment. The primary endpoint was time to clinical response-a composite of vital sign stabilisation and hospital discharge-in the influenza-positive population. The trial was powered to show an improvement of 1·5 days or greater with 600 mg intravenous zanamivir. Pharmacokinetic, safety, and virology endpoints were also assessed. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01231620. FINDINGS: Between Jan 15, 2011, and Feb 12, 2015, 626 patients were randomly assigned to receive 300 mg intravenous zanamivir (n=201), 600 mg intravenous zanamivir (n=209), or 75 mg oral oseltamivir (n=205) twice a day; 11 patients discontinued the study before receiving any study treatment. 488 (78%) of 626 patients had laboratory-confirmed influenza. Compared with a median time to clinical response of 5·14 days in the 600 mg intravenous zanamivir group, the median time to clinical response was 5·87 days (difference of -0·73 days, 95% CI -1·79 to 0·75; p=0·25) in the 300 mg intravenous zanamivir group and 5·63 days (difference of -0·48 days, 95% CI -2·11 to 0·97; p=0·39) in the oseltamivir group. Four patients with influenza A/H1N1pdm09 in the oseltamivir group developed H275Y resistance mutations. Adverse events were reported in 373 (61%) of treated patients and were similar across treatment groups; the most common adverse events (300 mg intravenous zanamivir, 600 mg intravenous zanamivir, oseltamivir) were diarrhoea (10 [5%], 15 [7%], 14 [7%]), respiratory failure (11 [5%], 14 [7%], 11 [5%]), and constipation (7 [3%], 13 [6%], 10 [5%]). 41 (7%) treated patients died during the study (15 [7%], 15 [7%], 11 [5%]); the most common causes of death were respiratory failure and septic shock. INTERPRETATION: Time to clinical response to intravenous zanamivir dosed at 600 mg was not superior to oseltamivir or 300 mg intravenous zanamivir. All treatments had a similar safety profile in hospitalised patients with severe influenza. FUNDING: GlaxoSmithKline.
Authors: Timothy M Uyeki; Henry H Bernstein; John S Bradley; Janet A Englund; Thomas M File; Alicia M Fry; Stefan Gravenstein; Frederick G Hayden; Scott A Harper; Jon Mark Hirshon; Michael G Ison; B Lynn Johnston; Shandra L Knight; Allison McGeer; Laura E Riley; Cameron R Wolfe; Paul E Alexander; Andrew T Pavia Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2019-03-05 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: John H Beigel; Hannah H Nam; Peter L Adams; Amy Krafft; William L Ince; Samer S El-Kamary; Amy C Sims Journal: Antiviral Res Date: 2019-04-08 Impact factor: 5.970
Authors: Jennifer L McKimm-Breschkin; Shibo Jiang; David S Hui; John H Beigel; Elena A Govorkova; Nelson Lee Journal: Antiviral Res Date: 2017-11-21 Impact factor: 5.970
Authors: Christopher Robson; Sai Rupa Baskar; Robert Booy; Patricia E Ferguson; Nicole Gilroy; Jen Kok; Indy Sandaradura; Dominic Dwyer Journal: Aust Prescr Date: 2019-04-01
Authors: James C King; John H Beigel; Michael G Ison; Richard E Rothman; Timothy M Uyeki; Robert E Walker; James D Neaton; John S Tegeris; James A Zhou; Kimberly L Armstrong; Wendy Carter; Peter S Miele; Melissa S Willis; Andrea F Dugas; LaRee A Tracy; David M Vock; Rick A Bright Journal: Open Forum Infect Dis Date: 2019-03-14 Impact factor: 3.835
Authors: Anuradha Madan; Shuguang Chen; Phillip Yates; Michael L Washburn; Grace Roberts; Andrew J Peat; Yu Tao; Michael F Parry; Otis Barnum; Micah T McClain; Sumita Roy-Ghanta Journal: Open Forum Infect Dis Date: 2019-04-03 Impact factor: 3.835
Authors: Carlo Torti; Maria Mazzitelli; Federico Longhini; Eugenio Garofalo; Andrea Bruni; Aida Giancotti; Giorgio Settimo Barreca; Angela Quirino; Maria Carla Liberto; Francesca Serapide; Giovanni Matera; Enrico Maria Trecarichi; Paolo Navalesi Journal: BMC Infect Dis Date: 2019-10-16 Impact factor: 3.090
Authors: Jeremy J Lim; Anna C Nilsson; Michael Silverman; Nimer Assy; Priya Kulkarni; Jacqueline M McBride; Rong Deng; Chloe Li; Xiaoying Yang; Allen Nguyen; Priscilla Horn; Mauricio Maia; Aide Castro; Melicent C Peck; Joshua Galanter; Tom Chu; Elizabeth M Newton; Jorge A Tavel Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2020-06-23 Impact factor: 5.191