Literature DB >> 28093719

Metabolic nodal response as a prognostic marker after neoadjuvant therapy for oesophageal cancer.

J M Findlay1,2, K M Bradley3, L M Wang2,4, J M Franklin3, E J Teoh3, F V Gleeson3, N D Maynard1, R S Gillies1, M R Middleton2,5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The ability to predict recurrence and survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and surgery for oesophageal cancer remains elusive. This study evaluated the role of [18 F]fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET-CT in assessing tumour and nodal response as a prognostic marker.
METHODS: This was a single-centre UK cohort study. From 2006 to 2014, patients with oesophageal cancer staged with PET-CT before NAC, and restaged by CT or PET-CT before resection, were included. Pathological tumour response was evaluated using Mandard regression grades. Metabolic tumour and nodal responses (mTR and mNR respectively) were quantified using absolute and threshold reductions.
RESULTS: Among 294 included patients, mTR and mNR independently predicted prognosis before surgery. After surgery, mNR (but not mTR), pathological tumour response, resection margin status and pathological node category predicted prognosis. Patients with FDG-avid nodal disease after NAC were at high risk of recurrence/death at 1 and 2 years (43 and 71 per cent respectively; P = 0·030 and P = 0·025 versus patients without avid nodes), and had a worse prognosis than patients with non-avid nodal metastases: hazard ratio 4·19 (95 per cent c.i. 1·87 to 9·40) and 2·11 (1·12 to 3·97) respectively versus patients without nodal metastases. Considering mTR and mNR response separately improved prognostication.
CONCLUSION: mNR is a novel prognostic factor, independent of conventional N status. Primary and nodal tumours may respond discordantly and patients with FDG-avid nodes after NAC have a poor prognosis.
© 2017 BJS Society Ltd Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28093719     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.10435

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  4 in total

1.  Challenges in assessing response of oesophageal cancer to neoadjuvant therapy, and the potential of composite PET-CT and multimodal metrics.

Authors:  John M Findlay; Kevin M Bradley; Richard S Gillies; Nicholas D Maynard; Mark R Middleton
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Regulation of MRE11A by UBQLN4 leads to cisplatin resistance in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Tomohiro Murakami; Yoshiaki Shoji; Tomohiko Nishi; Shu-Ching Chang; Ron D Jachimowicz; Sojun Hoshimoto; Shigeshi Ono; Yosef Shiloh; Hiroya Takeuchi; Yuko Kitagawa; Dave S B Hoon; Matias A Bustos
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 6.603

Review 3.  PET/CT for Predicting Occult Lymph Node Metastasis in Gastric Cancer.

Authors:  Danyu Ma; Ying Zhang; Xiaoliang Shao; Chen Wu; Jun Wu
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2022-09-11       Impact factor: 3.109

4.  18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography predicts lymph node responses to definitive chemoradiotherapy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients.

Authors:  Wenyao Zhu; Yan Zhang; Li Kong; Yong Huang; Jinsong Zheng; Renben Wang; Minghuan Li; Jinming Yu
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2018-07-25       Impact factor: 4.147

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.