M Ballestero-Téllez, F Docobo-Pérez, I Portillo-Calderón1,2, J M Rodríguez-Martínez, L Racero1, M S Ramos-Guelfo1, J Blázquez2,3, J Rodríguez-Baño4, A Pascual. 1. Unidad intercentros de Enfermedades Infecciosas, Microbiología y Medicina Preventiva, Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena, Sevilla, Spain. 2. Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla, IBiS/Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío/CSIC/Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla, Spain. 3. Centro Nacional de Biotecnología, Madrid, Spain. 4. Departamento de Medicina, Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla, Spain.
Abstract
Objectives: Fosfomycin activity in Escherichia coli depends on several genes of unknown importance for fosfomycin resistance. The objective was to characterize the role of uhpT , glpT , cyaA and ptsI genes in fosfomycin resistance in E. coli. Methods: WT E. coli BW25113 and null mutants, Δ uhpT , Δ glpT , Δ cyaA , Δ ptsI , Δ glpT-uhpT , Δ glpT-cyaA , Δ glpT-ptsI , Δ uhpT-cyaA , Δ uhpT-ptsI and Δ ptsI-cyaA , were studied. Susceptibility to fosfomycin was tested using CLSI guidelines. Fosfomycin mutant frequencies were determined at concentrations of 64 and 256 mg/L. Fosfomycin in vitro activity was tested using time-kill assays at concentrations of 64 and 307 mg/L (human C max ). Results: Fosfomycin MICs were: WT E. coli BW25113 (2 mg/L), Δ glpT (2 mg/L), Δ uhpT (64 mg/L), Δ cyaA (8 mg/L), Δ ptsI (2 mg/L), Δ glpT-uhpT (256 mg/L), Δ glpT-cyaA (8 mg/L), Δ glpT-ptsI (2 mg/L), Δ uhpT-cyaA (512 mg/L), Δ uhpT-ptsI (64 mg/L) and Δ ptsI-cyaA (32 mg/L). In the mutant frequency assays, no mutants were recovered from BW25113. Mutants appeared in Δ glpT , Δ uhpT , Δ cyaA and Δ ptsI at 64 mg/L and in Δ uhpT and Δ cyaA at 256 mg/L. Δ glpT-ptsI , but not Δ glpT-cyaA , Δ uhpT-cyaA or Δ uhpT-ptsI , increased the mutant frequency compared with the highest frequency found in each single mutant. In time-kill assays, all mutants regrew at 64 mg/L. Initial bacterial reductions of 2-4 log 10 cfu/mL were observed for all strains, except for Δ uhpT-ptsI , Δ glpT-uhpT and Δ uhpT-cyaA . Only Δ glpT and Δ ptsI mutants were cleared using 307 mg/L. Conclusions: Fosfomycin MIC may not be a good efficacy predictor, as highly resistant mutants may appear, depending on other pre-existing mutations with no impact on MIC.
Objectives:Fosfomycin activity in Escherichia coli depends on several genes of unknown importance for fosfomycin resistance. The objective was to characterize the role of uhpT , glpT , cyaA and ptsI genes in fosfomycin resistance in E. coli. Methods: WT E. coli BW25113 and null mutants, Δ uhpT , Δ glpT , Δ cyaA , Δ ptsI , Δ glpT-uhpT , Δ glpT-cyaA , Δ glpT-ptsI , Δ uhpT-cyaA , Δ uhpT-ptsI and Δ ptsI-cyaA , were studied. Susceptibility to fosfomycin was tested using CLSI guidelines. Fosfomycin mutant frequencies were determined at concentrations of 64 and 256 mg/L. Fosfomycin in vitro activity was tested using time-kill assays at concentrations of 64 and 307 mg/L (human C max ). Results:Fosfomycin MICs were: WT E. coli BW25113 (2 mg/L), Δ glpT (2 mg/L), Δ uhpT (64 mg/L), Δ cyaA (8 mg/L), Δ ptsI (2 mg/L), Δ glpT-uhpT (256 mg/L), Δ glpT-cyaA (8 mg/L), Δ glpT-ptsI (2 mg/L), Δ uhpT-cyaA (512 mg/L), Δ uhpT-ptsI (64 mg/L) and Δ ptsI-cyaA (32 mg/L). In the mutant frequency assays, no mutants were recovered from BW25113. Mutants appeared in Δ glpT , Δ uhpT , Δ cyaA and Δ ptsI at 64 mg/L and in Δ uhpT and Δ cyaA at 256 mg/L. Δ glpT-ptsI , but not Δ glpT-cyaA , Δ uhpT-cyaA or Δ uhpT-ptsI , increased the mutant frequency compared with the highest frequency found in each single mutant. In time-kill assays, all mutants regrew at 64 mg/L. Initial bacterial reductions of 2-4 log 10 cfu/mL were observed for all strains, except for Δ uhpT-ptsI , Δ glpT-uhpT and Δ uhpT-cyaA . Only Δ glpT and Δ ptsI mutants were cleared using 307 mg/L. Conclusions: Fosfomycin MIC may not be a good efficacy predictor, as highly resistant mutants may appear, depending on other pre-existing mutations with no impact on MIC.
Authors: J M Rodríguez-Martínez; F Docobo-Pérez; M Ortiz-Padilla; I Portillo-Calderón; B de Gregorio-Iaria; J Blázquez; J Rodríguez-Baño; A Pascual Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2021-02-17 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: I Portillo-Calderón; M Ortiz-Padilla; B de Gregorio-Iaria; V Merino-Bohorquez; J Blázquez; J Rodríguez-Baño; J M Rodríguez-Martínez; A Pascual; F Docobo-Pérez Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2021-03-08 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Aaron E Lucas; Ryota Ito; Mustapha M Mustapha; Christi L McElheny; Roberta T Mettus; Sarah L Bowler; Serena F Kantz; Marissa P Pacey; A William Pasculle; Vaughn S Cooper; Yohei Doi Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2017-12-26 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: Tianchi Chen; Lin Zhao; Yao Liu; Ya'nan Wang; Ying Jian; Na Zhao; Ziyu Yang; Xi Wang; Qian Liu; Min Li Journal: J Antimicrob Chemother Date: 2022-09-30 Impact factor: 5.758
Authors: Sara Sanders; David Bartee; Mackenzie J Harrison; Paul D Phillips; Andrew T Koppisch; Caren L Freel Meyers Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-05-17 Impact factor: 3.240