| Literature DB >> 28093314 |
Guanghao Sun1, Yosuke Nakayama2, Sumiyakhand Dagdanpurev2, Shigeto Abe3, Hidekazu Nishimura4, Tetsuo Kirimoto5, Takemi Matsui2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Infrared thermography (IRT) is used to screen febrile passengers at international airports, but it suffers from low sensitivity. This study explored the application of a combined visible and thermal image processing approach that uses a CMOS camera equipped with IRT to remotely sense multiple vital signs and screen patients with suspected infectious diseases.Entities:
Keywords: Fever screening; Infection control; Mass screening; Thermography; Vital signs
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28093314 PMCID: PMC7110473 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2017.01.007
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Infect Dis ISSN: 1201-9712 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1Schematic representation of the visible and thermal image processing method that remotely senses multiple vital signs and the multiple logistic regression function that predicts the possibility of infection.
Figure 2Discrimination results represented by plotting the Z(x1, x2, x3) values against the axillary temperatures of the two groups.
Comparisons between the patients with influenza and the healthy control subjects.
| Status | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Influenza | 19.0 | 31 | 95 | 36.9 |
| Influenza | 18.9 | 24 | 102 | 37.1 |
| Influenza | 15.7 | 20 | 108 | 36.4 |
| Influenza | 14.1 | 22 | 91 | 37.1 |
| Influenza | 12.1 | 19 | 83 | 37.6 |
| Influenza | 10.5 | 21 | 96 | 36.1 |
| Influenza | 10.1 | 12 | 103 | 36.4 |
| Influenza | 7.6 | 22 | 86 | 36.1 |
| Influenza | 6.9 | 12 | 80 | 37.5 |
| Influenza | 6.1 | 14 | 89 | 36.4 |
| Influenza | 5.3 | 22 | 80 | 36.1 |
| Influenza | 4.8 | 15 | 84 | 36.4 |
| Influenza | 2.8 | 20 | 87 | 35.2 |
| Influenza | 1.6 | 25 | 66 | 36.1 |
| Healthy | −0.4 | 18 | 72 | 35.9 |
| Healthy | −0.4 | 18 | 72 | 35.9 |
| Influenza | −0.4 | 18 | 68 | 36.2 |
| Healthy | −0.9 | 18 | 80 | 35.2 |
| Healthy | −1.7 | 18 | 67 | 36 |
| Healthy | −2.3 | 31 | 67 | 34.5 |
| Influenza | −2.7 | 20 | 72 | 35.2 |
| Healthy | −2.7 | 20 | 65 | 35.7 |
| Healthy | −2.7 | 28 | 64 | 35 |
| Healthy | −2.8 | 24 | 66 | 35.2 |
| Healthy | −3.8 | 15 | 67 | 36.7 |
| Healthy | −4.7 | 22 | 57 | 35.7 |
| Healthy | −4.9 | 22 | 63 | 35.7 |
Figure 3Mean (standard deviation) values were calculated for the three vital signs. The differences between the influenza patients and the healthy control subjects with respect to heart rate, respiration rate, and facial skin temperature were assessed. NS, not significant.