Literature DB >> 28093213

Characterization of the efficiency and uncertainty of skimmed milk flocculation for the simultaneous concentration and quantification of water-borne viruses, bacteria and protozoa.

Eloy Gonzales-Gustavson1, Yexenia Cárdenas-Youngs1, Miquel Calvo1, Marcelle Figueira Marques da Silva1, Ayalkibet Hundesa1, Inmaculada Amorós2, Yolanda Moreno2, Laura Moreno-Mesonero2, Rosa Rosell3, Llilianne Ganges3, Rosa Araujo1, Rosina Girones4.   

Abstract

In this study, the use of skimmed milk flocculation (SMF) to simultaneously concentrate viruses, bacteria and protozoa was evaluated. We selected strains of faecal indicator bacteria and pathogens, such as Escherichia coli and Helicobacter pylori. The viruses selected were adenovirus (HAdV 35), rotavirus (RoV SA-11), the bacteriophage MS2 and bovine viral diarrhoea virus (BVDV). The protozoa tested were Acanthamoeba, Giardia and Cryptosporidium. The mean recoveries with q(RT)PCR were 66% (HAdV 35), 24% (MS2), 28% (RoV SA-11), 15% (BVDV), 60% (E. coli), 30% (H. pylori) and 21% (Acanthamoeba castellanii). When testing the infectivity, the mean recoveries were 59% (HAdV 35), 12% (MS2), 26% (RoV SA-11) and 0.7% (BVDV). The protozoa Giardia lamblia and Cryptosporidium parvum were studied by immunofluorescence with recoveries of 18% and 13%, respectively. Although q(RT)PCR consistently showed higher quantification values (as expected), q(RT)PCR and the infectivity assays showed similar recoveries for HAdV 35 and RoV SA-11. Additionally, we investigated modelling the variability and uncertainty of the recovery with this method to extrapolate the quantification obtained by q(RT)PCR and estimate the real concentration. The 95% prediction intervals of the real concentration of the microorganisms inoculated were calculated using a general non-parametric bootstrap procedure adapted in our context to estimate the technical error of the measurements. SMF shows recoveries with a low variability that permits the use of a mathematical approximation to predict the concentration of the pathogen and indicator with acceptable low intervals. The values of uncertainty may be used for a quantitative microbial risk analysis or diagnostic purposes.
Copyright © 2017 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Microorganisms; Real concentration; Recovery; Skimmed milk flocculation; Water contamination; q(RT)PCR

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28093213     DOI: 10.1016/j.mimet.2017.01.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Microbiol Methods        ISSN: 0167-7012            Impact factor:   2.363


  4 in total

1.  Fast screening of enteropathogens in marine water samples.

Authors:  Carmen Baur Vieira; Irene Trigueiros Araújo; Fernando César Ferreira; Jie Liu; Renato Castiglia Feitosa; Marize Pereira Miagostovich
Journal:  Braz J Microbiol       Date:  2022-05-21       Impact factor: 2.214

2.  Ahead of the second wave: Early warning for COVID-19 by wastewater surveillance in Hungary.

Authors:  Eszter Róka; Bernadett Khayer; Zoltán Kis; Luca Bella Kovács; Eszter Schuler; Nóra Magyar; Tibor Málnási; Orsolya Oravecz; Bernadett Pályi; Tamás Pándics; Márta Vargha
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 7.963

3.  High Prevalence of Rotavirus A in Raw Sewage Samples from Northeast Spain.

Authors:  Marcelle Silva-Sales; Sandra Martínez-Puchol; Eloy Gonzales-Gustavson; Ayalkibet Hundesa; Rosina Gironès
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2020-03-16       Impact factor: 5.048

4.  Method Development for Enteric Virus Recovery from Primary Sludge.

Authors:  Yarrow S Linden; Christine S Fagnant-Sperati; Alexandra L Kossik; Joanna Ciol Harrison; Nicola K Beck; David S Boyle; John Scott Meschke
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 5.048

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.