Literature DB >> 28092638

MR elastography to measure the effects of cancer and pathology fixation on prostate biomechanics, and comparison with T 1, T 2 and ADC.

Deirdre M McGrath1, Jenny Lee, Warren D Foltz, Navid Samavati, Theo van der Kwast, Michael A S Jewett, Peter Chung, Cynthia Ménard, Kristy K Brock.   

Abstract

MRI is under evaluation for image-guided intervention for prostate cancer. The sensitivity and specificity of MRI parameters is determined via correlation with the gold-standard of histopathology. Whole-mount histopathology of prostatectomy specimens can be digitally registered to in vivo imaging for correlation. When biomechanical-based deformable registration is employed to account for deformation during histopathology processing, the ex vivo biomechanical properties are required. However, these properties are altered by pathology fixation, and vary with disease. Hence, this study employs magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) to measure ex vivo prostate biomechanical properties before and after fixation. A quasi-static MRE method was employed to measure high resolution maps of Young's modulus (E) before and after fixation of canine prostate and prostatectomy specimens (n  =  4) from prostate cancer patients who had previously received radiation therapy. For comparison, T 1, T 2 and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) were measured in parallel. E (kPa) varied across clinical anatomy and for histopathology-identified tumor: peripheral zone: 99(±22), central gland: 48(±37), tumor: 85(±53), and increased consistently with fixation (factor of 11  ±  5; p  <  0.02). T 2 decreased consistently with fixation, while changes in T 1 and ADC were more complex and inconsistent. The biomechanics of the clinical prostate specimens varied greatly with fixation, and to a lesser extent with disease and anatomy. The data obtained will improve the precision of prostate pathology correlation, leading to more accurate disease detection and targeting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28092638      PMCID: PMC5318143          DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aa52f4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  32 in total

1.  Comparison of quantitative T2 mapping and diffusion-weighted imaging in the normal and pathologic prostate.

Authors:  P Gibbs; D J Tozer; G P Liney; L W Turnbull
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  MR elastography of the prostate: initial in-vivo application.

Authors:  J Kemper; R Sinkus; J Lorenzen; C Nolte-Ernsting; A Stork; G Adam
Journal:  Rofo       Date:  2004-08

3.  Quasi-static magnetic resonance elastography at 7 T to measure the effect of pathology before and after fixation on tissue biomechanical properties.

Authors:  Deirdre M McGrath; Warren D Foltz; Adil Al-Mayah; Carolyn J Niu; Kristy K Brock
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2011-12-28       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  Magnetic resonance imaging and mathematical modeling of progressive formalin fixation of the human brain.

Authors:  Charlotte J Yong-Hing; Andre Obenaus; Rodrick Stryker; Karen Tong; Gordon E Sarty
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  B-mode and acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) imaging of prostate zonal anatomy: comparison with 3T T2-weighted MR imaging.

Authors:  Mark L Palmeri; Zachary A Miller; Tyler J Glass; Kirema Garcia-Reyes; Rajan T Gupta; Stephen J Rosenzweig; Christopher Kauffman; Thomas J Polascik; Andrew Buck; Evan Kulbacki; John Madden; Samantha L Lipman; Ned C Rouze; Kathryn R Nightingale
Journal:  Ultrason Imaging       Date:  2014-07-23       Impact factor: 1.578

6.  Technical Note: Method to correlate whole-specimen histopathology of radical prostatectomy with diagnostic MR imaging.

Authors:  Deirdre M McGrath; Jenny Lee; Warren D Foltz; Navid Samavati; Michael A S Jewett; Theo van der Kwast; Peter Chung; Cynthia Ménard; Kristy K Brock
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  MR elastography and diffusion-weighted imaging of ex vivo prostate cancer: quantitative comparison to histopathology.

Authors:  Ramin S Sahebjavaher; Guy Nir; Louis O Gagnon; Joseph Ischia; Edward C Jones; Silvia D Chang; Andrew Yung; Mohammad Honarvar; Ladan Fazli; S Larry Goldenberg; Robert Rohling; Ralph Sinkus; Piotr Kozlowski; Septimiu E Salcudean
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2014-11-10       Impact factor: 4.044

8.  Clinical prostate T2 quantification using magnetization-prepared spiral imaging.

Authors:  Warren D Foltz; Supriya Chopra; Peter Chung; Andrew Bayley; Charles Catton; David Jaffray; Graham A Wright; Masoom A Haider; Cynthia Ménard
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  Articular cartilage deformation determined in an intact tibiofemoral joint by displacement-encoded imaging.

Authors:  Deva D Chan; Corey P Neu; Maury L Hull
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 4.668

10.  Identifying Clinically Significant Prostate Cancers using 3-D In Vivo Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse Imaging with Whole-Mount Histology Validation.

Authors:  Mark L Palmeri; Tyler J Glass; Zachary A Miller; Stephen J Rosenzweig; Andrew Buck; Thomas J Polascik; Rajan T Gupta; Alison F Brown; John Madden; Kathryn R Nightingale
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2016-03-03       Impact factor: 2.998

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  New and Emerging Applications of Magnetic Resonance Elastography of Other Abdominal Organs.

Authors:  Jin Wang; Ying Deng; Danielle Jondal; David M Woodrum; Yu Shi; Meng Yin; Sudhakar K Venkatesh
Journal:  Top Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2018-10

Review 2.  Basic concepts and applications of functional magnetic resonance imaging for radiotherapy of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Lars E Olsson; Mikael Johansson; Björn Zackrisson; Lennart K Blomqvist
Journal:  Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2019-02-25

3.  Fully automated quantification of in vivo viscoelasticity of prostate zones using magnetic resonance elastography with Dense U-net segmentation.

Authors:  Nader Aldoj; Federico Biavati; Marc Dewey; Anja Hennemuth; Patrick Asbach; Ingolf Sack
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-02-07       Impact factor: 4.996

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.