C A Gaydos1, J Schwebke2, J Dombrowski3, J Marrazzo2,3, J Coleman1, B Silver1, M Barnes1, L Crane4, P Fine4. 1. a Division of Infectious Diseases , Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine , Baltimore , Maryland , USA. 2. b Division of Infectious Diseases , University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine , Birmingham , Alabama , USA. 3. c Division of Infectious Diseases , University of Washington School of Medicine , Seattle , Washigton , USA. 4. d Planned Parenthood , Houston , Texas , USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Solana® (Quidel) is a new rapid (<40 min.) point-of-care (POC) test for qualitative detection of Trichomonas vaginalis (TV) DNA. The assay has two steps: 1) specimen preparation, and 2) amplification and detection using isothermal Helicase-Dependent Amplification (HDA). The objective was to demonstrate the performance of Solana for vaginal swabs and female urines based on comparison to wet mount and TV culture. Performance was also compared to the Aptima-TV assay. METHODS: Urine and four clinician-collected vaginal swabs were collected. The first two were used for FDA composite reference (wet mount; InPouch TV Culture). The third swab was used for Solana. Sensitivity/specificity were based on the reference method. A specimen was considered positive if either test was positive. The fourth swab was for Aptima-TV. RESULTS: Vaginal swabs and urines were obtained from 501 asymptomatic and 543 symptomatic women. Prevalence of TV by was 11.5%. For swabs, Solana® demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity from asymptomatic (100%/98.9%) and symptomatic (98.6%/98.5%) women, as well as for urines from asymptomatic (98.0%/98.4%) and symptomatic (92.9%/97.9%) women, compared to the reference method. Compared to Aptima-TV, the sensitivity/specificity was 89.7%/99.0% for swabs and 100%/98.9% for urines. CONCLUSION: The Solana® assay performed well compared to the reference assays.
BACKGROUND: Solana® (Quidel) is a new rapid (<40 min.) point-of-care (POC) test for qualitative detection of Trichomonas vaginalis (TV) DNA. The assay has two steps: 1) specimen preparation, and 2) amplification and detection using isothermal Helicase-Dependent Amplification (HDA). The objective was to demonstrate the performance of Solana for vaginal swabs and female urines based on comparison to wet mount and TV culture. Performance was also compared to the Aptima-TV assay. METHODS: Urine and four clinician-collected vaginal swabs were collected. The first two were used for FDA composite reference (wet mount; InPouch TV Culture). The third swab was used for Solana. Sensitivity/specificity were based on the reference method. A specimen was considered positive if either test was positive. The fourth swab was for Aptima-TV. RESULTS: Vaginal swabs and urines were obtained from 501 asymptomatic and 543 symptomatic women. Prevalence of TV by was 11.5%. For swabs, Solana® demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity from asymptomatic (100%/98.9%) and symptomatic (98.6%/98.5%) women, as well as for urines from asymptomatic (98.0%/98.4%) and symptomatic (92.9%/97.9%) women, compared to the reference method. Compared to Aptima-TV, the sensitivity/specificity was 89.7%/99.0% for swabs and 100%/98.9% for urines. CONCLUSION: The Solana® assay performed well compared to the reference assays.
Authors: Jane R Schwebke; Marcia M Hobbs; Stephanie N Taylor; Arlene C Sena; Michael G Catania; Barbara S Weinbaum; Ann D Johnson; Damon K Getman; Charlotte A Gaydos Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2011-09-21 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: Olivia Twu; Daniele Dessí; Anh Vu; Frances Mercer; Grant C Stevens; Natalia de Miguel; Paola Rappelli; Anna Rita Cocco; Robert T Clubb; Pier Luigi Fiori; Patricia J Johnson Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2014-05-19 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: C C Ginocchio; K Chapin; J S Smith; J Aslanzadeh; J Snook; C S Hill; C A Gaydos Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2012-05-23 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: Evelyn Byrd Quinlivan; Shilpa N Patel; Catherine A Grodensky; Carol E Golin; Hsiao-Chuan Tien; Marcia M Hobbs Journal: Sex Transm Dis Date: 2012-09 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Jennifer R Stark; Gregory Judson; John F Alderete; Vasanthakrishna Mundodi; Ashwini S Kucknoor; Edward L Giovannucci; Elizabeth A Platz; Siobhan Sutcliffe; Katja Fall; Tobias Kurth; Jing Ma; Meir J Stampfer; Lorelei A Mucci Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2009-09-09 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Charlotte A Gaydos; Jeffrey D Klausner; Nitika Pant Pai; Helen Kelly; Cordelia Coltart; Rosanna W Peeling Journal: Sex Transm Infect Date: 2017-07-06 Impact factor: 3.519
Authors: Patricia J Kissinger; Charlotte A Gaydos; Arlene C Seña; R Scott McClelland; David Soper; W Evan Secor; Davey Legendre; Kimberly A Workowski; Christina A Muzny Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2022-04-13 Impact factor: 20.999
Authors: Megan Clare Craig-Kuhn; Charleigh Granade; Christina A Muzny; Barbara Van Der Pol; Rebecca Lillis; Stephanie N Taylor; Norine Schmidt; David H Martin; Patricia Kissinger Journal: Sex Transm Dis Date: 2019-05 Impact factor: 2.830