Literature DB >> 28092440

Molecular Interactions between Graphene and Biological Molecules.

Xingquan Zou1, Shuai Wei1, Joshua Jasensky1, Minyu Xiao1, Qiuming Wang1, Charles L Brooks Iii1, Zhan Chen1.   

Abstract

Applications of graphene have extended into areas of nanobio-technology such as nanobio-medicine, nanobio-sensing, as well as nanoelectronics with biomolecules. These applications involve interactions between proteins, peptides, DNA, RNA etc. and graphene, therefore understanding such molecular interactions is essential. For example, many applications based on using graphene and peptides require peptides to interact with (e.g., noncovalently bind to) graphene at one end, while simultaneously exposing the other end to the surrounding medium (e.g., to detect analytes in solution). To control and characterize peptide behavior on a graphene surface in solution is difficult. Here we successfully probed the molecular interactions between two peptides (cecropin P1 and MSI-78(C1)) and graphene in situ and in real-time using sum frequency generation (SFG) vibrational spectroscopy and molecular dynamics (MD) simulation. We demonstrated that the distribution of various planar (including aromatic (Phe, Trp, Tyr, and His)/amide (Asn and Gln)/Guanidine (Arg)) side-chains and charged hydrophilic (such as Lys) side-chains in a peptide sequence determines the orientation of the peptide adsorbed on a graphene surface. It was found that peptide interactions with graphene depend on the competition between both planar and hydrophilic residues in the peptide. Our results indicated that part of cecropin P1 stands up on graphene due to an unbalanced distribution of planar and hydrophilic residues, whereas MSI-78(C1) lies down on graphene due to an even distribution of Phe residues and hydrophilic residues. With such knowledge, we could rationally design peptides with desired residues to manipulate peptide-graphene interactions, which allows peptides to adopt optimized structure and exhibit excellent activity for nanobio-technological applications. This research again demonstrates the power to combine SFG vibrational spectroscopy and MD simulation in studying interfacial biological molecules.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28092440     DOI: 10.1021/jacs.6b11226

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Chem Soc        ISSN: 0002-7863            Impact factor:   15.419


  14 in total

1.  Principles and Biomedical Application of Graphene Family Nanomaterials.

Authors:  Iruthayapandi Selestin Raja; Saifullah Lone; Dong-Wook Han; Suck Won Hong
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 2.622

Review 2.  Understanding interactions between biomolecules and two-dimensional nanomaterials using in silico microscopes.

Authors:  Serena H Chen; David R Bell; Binquan Luan
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 17.873

3.  Molecular interactions between single layered MoS2 and biological molecules.

Authors:  Minyu Xiao; Shuai Wei; Yaoxin Li; Joshua Jasensky; Junjie Chen; Charles L Brooks; Zhan Chen
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2017-11-30       Impact factor: 9.825

Review 4.  Advantages of Graphene Biosensors for Human Stem Cell Therapy Potency Assays.

Authors:  Roxana-Maria Amărandi; Diana F Becheru; George M Vlăsceanu; Mariana Ioniță; Jorge S Burns
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-05-29       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Probing protein aggregation at buried interfaces: distinguishing between adsorbed protein monomers, dimers, and a monomer-dimer mixture in situ.

Authors:  Tieyi Lu; Wen Guo; Prathamesh M Datar; Yue Xin; E Neil G Marsh; Zhan Chen
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2021-12-21       Impact factor: 9.825

6.  Insights into the conformation changes of SARS-CoV-2 spike receptor-binding domain on graphene.

Authors:  Jianbin Du; Chunmei Yang; Xiangyun Ma; Qifeng Li
Journal:  Appl Surf Sci       Date:  2021-11-27       Impact factor: 6.707

Review 7.  Recent Trends in Graphene/Polymer Nanocomposites for Sensing Devices: Synthesis and Applications in Environmental and Human Health Monitoring.

Authors:  Elisa Toto; Susanna Laurenzi; Maria Gabriella Santonicola
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 4.329

8.  3D Fabrication with Integration Molding of a Graphene Oxide/Polycaprolactone Nanoscaffold for Neurite Regeneration and Angiogenesis.

Authors:  Yun Qian; Jialin Song; Xiaotian Zhao; Wei Chen; Yuanming Ouyang; Weien Yuan; Cunyi Fan
Journal:  Adv Sci (Weinh)       Date:  2018-01-26       Impact factor: 16.806

9.  A Facile Method for the Non-Covalent Amine Functionalization of Carbon-Based Surfaces for Use in Biosensor Development.

Authors:  Ffion Walters; Muhammad Munem Ali; Gregory Burwell; Sergiy Rozhko; Zari Tehrani; Ehsaneh Daghigh Ahmadi; Jon E Evans; Hina Y Abbasi; Ryan Bigham; Jacob John Mitchell; Olga Kazakova; Anitha Devadoss; Owen J Guy
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2020-09-10       Impact factor: 5.076

10.  Optimization of Glutathione Adhesion Process to Modified Graphene Surfaces.

Authors:  Witold Jakubowski; Radomir Atraszkiewicz; Dorota Nowak; Damian Batory; Witold Szymański; Anna Sobczyk-Guzenda; Łukasz Kaczmarek; Piotr Kula; Marian Cłapa; Tomasz Warga; Małgorzata Czerniak-Reczulska
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 5.076

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.