Literature DB >> 2809051

Risk factors for pressure sores. A comparison of cross-sectional and cohort-derived data.

D R Berlowitz1, S V Wilking.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to identify prospectively risk factors for pressure sores and to compare these results with a cross-sectional analysis in the same population. Medical records on all admissions to a chronic care hospital over a 13-month period were reviewed. Data on potential risk factors were abstracted from the initial history, physical examination, nursing assessment, and laboratory studies. Pressure sore status on admission and at three weeks was determined from a standardized from completed on all patients with a score. The cross-sectional analysis was performed by comparing patients with and without a pressure sore at the time of admission. The cohort analysis used patients initially without a pressure sore and monitored for a new sore at three weeks. Factors associated with pressure sores on univariate testing were entered into a stepwise logistic regression model. One hundred of the 301 admissions presented with a pressure sore. Factors significantly associated with the presence of a sore were altered level of consciousness (OR = 4.1), bed- or chair-bound (OR = 2.4), impaired nutritional intake (OR = 1.9), and hypoalbuminemia (OR = 1.8 for 10 mg/mL decrease). Of the 185 patients without a pressure sore, 20 (10.8%) developed a sore. Factors significantly associated with the development of a new pressure sore were a history of cerebrovascular accident (OR = 5.0), bed- or chair-bound (OR = 3.8), and impaired nutritional intake (OR = 2.8). Neither urinary nor fecal incontinence, nor the presence of hypoalbuminemia, was associated with sore development. We have prospectively identified risk factors for pressure sores.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2809051     DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1989.tb06918.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc        ISSN: 0002-8614            Impact factor:   5.562


  21 in total

Review 1.  Assessment and management of pressure ulcers in the elderly: current strategies.

Authors:  Efraim Jaul
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 2.  Backrest position in prevention of pressure ulcers and ventilator-associated pneumonia: conflicting recommendations.

Authors:  Ruth Srednicki Burk; Mary Jo Grap
Journal:  Heart Lung       Date:  2012-07-21       Impact factor: 2.210

3.  Pressure necrosis secondary to negative pressure dressing.

Authors:  S Mulgrew; A Khoo; R M Newton; R Rajan; K Kumar
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 4.  The Topical Evolution: Free Ions, Orthomolecular Agents, Phytochemicals, and Insect-Produced Substances.

Authors:  Teresa Conner-Kerr
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 5.  Malnutrition as a Precursor of Pressure Ulcers.

Authors:  Mary D Litchford; Becky Dorner; Mary Ellen Posthauer
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2014-01-01       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 6.  Pressure sores.

Authors:  R K Vohra; C N McCollum
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-10-01

7.  Management of stage III pressure ulcers in moderately demented nursing home residents.

Authors:  E L Siegler; R Lavizzo-Mourey
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1991 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 8.  Support surfaces for pressure ulcer prevention.

Authors:  Elizabeth McInnes; Asmara Jammali-Blasi; Sally E M Bell-Syer; Jo C Dumville; Victoria Middleton; Nicky Cullum
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-09-03

9.  Complications in patients with spinal cord injuries sustained in an earthquake in Northern Pakistan.

Authors:  Syeda Fizza Tauqir; Shirin Mirza; Shahzad Gul; Hirra Ghaffar; Asif Zafar
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 1.985

10.  Hip fracture and pressure ulcers - the Pan-European Pressure Ulcer Study - intrinsic and extrinsic risk factors.

Authors:  Christina Lindholm; Eila Sterner; Marco Romanelli; Elaine Pina; Joan Torra y Bou; Helvi Hietanen; Ansa Iivanainen; Lena Gunningberg; Ami Hommel; Birgitta Klang; Carol Dealey
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.