Literature DB >> 28090380

Transposable elements and circular DNAs.

Tobias Mourier1.   

Abstract

Circular DNAs are extra-chromosomal fragments that become circularized by genomic recombination events. We have recently shown that yeast LTR elements generate circular DNAs through recombination events between their flanking long terminal repeats (LTRs). Similarly, circular DNAs can be generated by recombination between LTRs residing at different genomic loci, in which case the circular DNA will contain the intervening sequence. In yeast, this can result in gene copy number variations when circles contain genes and origins of replication. Here, I speculate on the potential and implications of circular DNAs generated through recombination between human transposable elements.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alu elements; circular DNAs; eccDNAs; evolution; genome; human; yeast

Year:  2016        PMID: 28090380      PMCID: PMC5173269          DOI: 10.1080/2159256X.2016.1240748

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mob Genet Elements        ISSN: 2159-2543


Although the presence of circular DNAs in the shape of fragments excised from the genome has been known for decades, their prevalence has only recently been highlighted. Circular DNAs are likely formed by non-homologous recombination events. In this respect, the multitude and sequence redundancy of transposable elements should render them highly efficient agents for the generation of circular DNAs. We recently assessed the involvement of transposable elements in the genesis of circular DNAs in baker's yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Detection of structural variants—of which circular DNAs are a subset—requires customized analysis and is not directly elucidated using conventional mapping of short sequence reads onto reference genomes. Analysis is further complicated by the sequence redundancy of transposable elements. The baker's yeast genome contains 5 families of LTR elements occupying roughly 3% of the genome. The LTR elements are retrotransposable elements encoding the proteins necessary for their movement and flanked by long-terminal repeats (LTRs). Most copies exist as solo LTR sequences, presumably generated through recombination events. When sequence reads highly enriched for circular sequences were mapped onto the yeast genome, a relative uniform coverage was observed across full-length LTR elements and this level of coverage did not extend outside the LTR borders. This suggested that the majority of LTR sequences in circular DNAs exist as full-length LTR elements, although circles generated from LTR sequences residing at different genomic location have also been reported. LTR elements are structurally related to retroviruses, for which generation of circular structures from extra-chromosomal linear DNA is readily observed. The presence of LTR sequences as circular DNA could therefore potentially both be a result of circularization of extra-chromosomal DNAs and the circularization arising from genomic recombination events. Circularization of linear extra-chromosomal LTR DNAs can happen in several ways, including nonhomologous end-joining, recombination between flanking LTR sequences, and through so-called auto-integration in which the LTR element inserts into its own sequence. However, due to the fact that these scenarios are all preceded by transcription of the genomic LTR element, any resulting circular LTR sequence will display an apparent breakpoint at the transcription start site (despite the fact that they may not be created by recombination events). If nucleotide differences exist between the 2 LTR sequences flanking an element the apparent breakpoint site can be inferred, and any apparent breakpoints outside the transcription start site region are therefore inconsistent with circles generated through circularization of linear extra-chromosomal DNA. Although only a few LTR sequences contained informative nucleotide differences, all tested sequences were inconsistent with being generated through circularization of linear extra-chromosomal DNA. It therefore seems that yeast LTR elements are a source for circular DNAs through genomic recombination between the flanking LTR sequences. Interestingly, this provides a potential novel way of LTR element movement, in which full-length LTR elements in circular DNAs may recombine back into the genome at other LTR loci.

Potential for DNA circularization by human transposable elements

The human genome contains relatively few intact LTR elements. However, as circles can be generated through recombination between repetitive sequences residing at different genomic loci, recombination between the highly abundant human transposable elements is not an unlikely scenario. One prominent candidate for generating circular DNAs would for example be the Alu family that is present in more than 1 million copies in human genomes. Although several subfamilies of Alu elements have evolved during primate evolution, consensus sequences from the different families are highly similar but for a few diagnostic sites. Alu elements are further known to participate in unequal homologous recombination, which has been associated with a range of human disease states. Although the sizes of coding sequences are highly uniform across eukaryotic genomes, the presence of introns means that the total size of human genes can exceed several hundreds of kilobasepairs. Although the possibility of entire human genes ending up in relatively small circular DNAs would at first appear to be limited, large circular DNAs as well as relatively short human genes would render this scenario far more conceivable. First, a circular DNA encompassing 39 kb has been reported in yeast, containing 2 histone genes as well as a centrome and origins of replication. More than 80% of the human genes in the ensembl annotation would fit in circles of this size. Second, numerous human genes are deprived of introns and therefore occupying a limited genomic space. Intronless human genes—presumably generated through retrotransposition using the LINE L1 machinery—are enriched for signal transducing- and regulatory genes, and for tissue-specific expression in brain or testis. Clearly, such relatively short genes could be contained in circular DNAs from a more modest size range.

Implications of DNA circularization by human transposable elements

In nitrogen-deprived yeast cultures amplifications and deletions of the GAP1 gene have been associated with the presence of circular DNAs harboring the GAP1 gene and an origin of replication. As nitrogen limitation results in elevated GAP1 expression, this prompted speculations that DNA circularization could provide a means for the cell to increase GAP1 activity through the presence of multiple gene copies residing in DNA circles. Although the number of cell divisions varies immensely between human tissues, and the specific nature of mammalian replications origins is still not well-understood, circular DNA carrying human genes could increase in numbers, providing additional gene copies to the cell. Yet, affecting gene copy numbers may not be the only impact of circular DNAs. Transcriptional regulation in mammalian cells often works at a regional scale, where genetic promoter regions physically interact with enhancer structures located at a considerable distance. Transcription is further regulated by epigenetic modifications, which can travel across larger genomic regions—the spread of which intriguingly can be stopped by the presence of transcriptionally active transposable elements. Transcription initiated at one genomic site may also drive or repress transcription at neighboring sites. This is referred to as transcriptional interference, a phenomenon that may even shape genome architecture. A gene residing in a circular DNA should hence evade such regional regulatory effects, and one may therefore speculate if the major impact of circular DNAs is not primarily in gene copy number variations, but in taking genes out of their regulatory context. It is also conceivable that gene copies residing in circular DNAs bind regulatory proteins, thereby potentially changing the dynamics and kinetics at other chromosomal loci. Similarly, transcripts from genes in circular DNAs may act as sinks by binding regulatory RNAs as well as proteins. Such an effect may obviously manifest itself without the entire gene sequence being present in circular DNAs, and circular DNAs harboring incomplete gene sequences may serve as previously described regulatory pseudogenes. In summary, we have previously shown that circular DNAs are generated from genomic copies of yeast transposable elements. It is currently unknown to which extent this is happening in mammalian genomes rich in transposable element sequences. Circular DNAs have a huge potential in altering gene copy numbers, and – as speculated here – in harboring genes that will be taken out of their regulatory context. Whether the generation of circular DNAs has an adaptive aspect, and may add novel functionality to the cell is of course an entirely different question. As circular DNAs from ribosomal genes are found in aging yeast cells, circularization may simply reflect a genomic deterioration associated with cellular decay. The true extent to which human transposable elements are a source for the generation of circular DNAs will be determined in coming experiments. But crucially, such experiments need to be tailored toward circular structures both in experimental design and in downstream analysis.
  42 in total

Review 1.  Extrachromosomal circular DNAs and genomic sequence plasticity in eukaryotic cells.

Authors:  J W Gaubatz
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1990 Sep-Nov       Impact factor: 2.433

Review 2.  Extrachromosomal circular DNA in eukaryotes: possible involvement in the plasticity of tandem repeats.

Authors:  S Cohen; D Segal
Journal:  Cytogenet Genome Res       Date:  2009-06-25       Impact factor: 1.636

3.  Human LINE retrotransposons generate processed pseudogenes.

Authors:  C Esnault; J Maestre; T Heidmann
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 38.330

Review 4.  Transposable element detection from whole genome sequence data.

Authors:  Adam D Ewing
Journal:  Mob DNA       Date:  2015-12-29

5.  Cancer etiology. Variation in cancer risk among tissues can be explained by the number of stem cell divisions.

Authors:  Cristian Tomasetti; Bert Vogelstein
Journal:  Science       Date:  2015-01-02       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Adaptation to diverse nitrogen-limited environments by deletion or extrachromosomal element formation of the GAP1 locus.

Authors:  David Gresham; Renata Usaite; Susanne Manuela Germann; Michael Lisby; David Botstein; Birgitte Regenberg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-10-11       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  The BioMart community portal: an innovative alternative to large, centralized data repositories.

Authors:  Damian Smedley; Syed Haider; Steffen Durinck; Luca Pandini; Paolo Provero; James Allen; Olivier Arnaiz; Mohammad Hamza Awedh; Richard Baldock; Giulia Barbiera; Philippe Bardou; Tim Beck; Andrew Blake; Merideth Bonierbale; Anthony J Brookes; Gabriele Bucci; Iwan Buetti; Sarah Burge; Cédric Cabau; Joseph W Carlson; Claude Chelala; Charalambos Chrysostomou; Davide Cittaro; Olivier Collin; Raul Cordova; Rosalind J Cutts; Erik Dassi; Alex Di Genova; Anis Djari; Anthony Esposito; Heather Estrella; Eduardo Eyras; Julio Fernandez-Banet; Simon Forbes; Robert C Free; Takatomo Fujisawa; Emanuela Gadaleta; Jose M Garcia-Manteiga; David Goodstein; Kristian Gray; José Afonso Guerra-Assunção; Bernard Haggarty; Dong-Jin Han; Byung Woo Han; Todd Harris; Jayson Harshbarger; Robert K Hastings; Richard D Hayes; Claire Hoede; Shen Hu; Zhi-Liang Hu; Lucie Hutchins; Zhengyan Kan; Hideya Kawaji; Aminah Keliet; Arnaud Kerhornou; Sunghoon Kim; Rhoda Kinsella; Christophe Klopp; Lei Kong; Daniel Lawson; Dejan Lazarevic; Ji-Hyun Lee; Thomas Letellier; Chuan-Yun Li; Pietro Lio; Chu-Jun Liu; Jie Luo; Alejandro Maass; Jerome Mariette; Thomas Maurel; Stefania Merella; Azza Mostafa Mohamed; Francois Moreews; Ibounyamine Nabihoudine; Nelson Ndegwa; Céline Noirot; Cristian Perez-Llamas; Michael Primig; Alessandro Quattrone; Hadi Quesneville; Davide Rambaldi; James Reecy; Michela Riba; Steven Rosanoff; Amna Ali Saddiq; Elisa Salas; Olivier Sallou; Rebecca Shepherd; Reinhard Simon; Linda Sperling; William Spooner; Daniel M Staines; Delphine Steinbach; Kevin Stone; Elia Stupka; Jon W Teague; Abu Z Dayem Ullah; Jun Wang; Doreen Ware; Marie Wong-Erasmus; Ken Youens-Clark; Amonida Zadissa; Shi-Jian Zhang; Arek Kasprzyk
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2015-04-20       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 8.  DNA replication origins-where do we begin?

Authors:  Marie-Noëlle Prioleau; David M MacAlpine
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 11.361

9.  Ensembl 2016.

Authors:  Andrew Yates; Wasiu Akanni; M Ridwan Amode; Daniel Barrell; Konstantinos Billis; Denise Carvalho-Silva; Carla Cummins; Peter Clapham; Stephen Fitzgerald; Laurent Gil; Carlos García Girón; Leo Gordon; Thibaut Hourlier; Sarah E Hunt; Sophie H Janacek; Nathan Johnson; Thomas Juettemann; Stephen Keenan; Ilias Lavidas; Fergal J Martin; Thomas Maurel; William McLaren; Daniel N Murphy; Rishi Nag; Michael Nuhn; Anne Parker; Mateus Patricio; Miguel Pignatelli; Matthew Rahtz; Harpreet Singh Riat; Daniel Sheppard; Kieron Taylor; Anja Thormann; Alessandro Vullo; Steven P Wilder; Amonida Zadissa; Ewan Birney; Jennifer Harrow; Matthieu Muffato; Emily Perry; Magali Ruffier; Giulietta Spudich; Stephen J Trevanion; Fiona Cunningham; Bronwen L Aken; Daniel R Zerbino; Paul Flicek
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2015-12-19       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Does selection against transcriptional interference shape retroelement-free regions in mammalian genomes?

Authors:  Tobias Mourier; Eske Willerslev
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-11-19       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Cell-Free eccDNAs: A New Type of Nucleic Acid Component for Liquid Biopsy?

Authors:  Jing Zhu; Siyu Chen; Fan Zhang; Liang Wang
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 4.074

2.  Transposon-Mediated Horizontal Transfer of the Host-Specific Virulence Protein ToxA between Three Fungal Wheat Pathogens.

Authors:  Megan C McDonald; Adam P Taranto; Erin Hill; Benjamin Schwessinger; Zhaohui Liu; Steven Simpfendorfer; Andrew Milgate; Peter S Solomon
Journal:  mBio       Date:  2019-09-10       Impact factor: 7.867

Review 3.  Small extrachromosomal circular DNA (eccDNA): major functions in evolution and cancer.

Authors:  Xiaoxuan Ling; Yali Han; Jinxue Meng; Bohuan Zhong; Jialong Chen; He Zhang; Jiheng Qin; Jing Pang; Linhua Liu
Journal:  Mol Cancer       Date:  2021-09-03       Impact factor: 27.401

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.