Literature DB >> 28090101

A Novel Mathematical Model for Determining Faculty Workload.

Leo R Fitzpatrick1, Carol Millette-Snodgrass1, Eman Atef1.   

Abstract

Objective. To develop a mathematical model for determining faculty workload at a college of pharmacy with a team-based learning curriculum. Methods. Using faculty provided data, our model calculated activity and weighted means in teaching, scholarship and service. Subsequently, these data were used to develop departmental and institutional workload models. Results. For the pharmaceutical and biomedical sciences department, percent faculty activity mean values were greatest for service followed by teaching and scholarship. These values in the clinical sciences department were greatest for teaching followed by service and scholarship. Overall, the institutional workload model had the largest maximum faculty activity value for teaching, followed by service and then scholarship. Conclusions. A novel faculty workload model proved to be effective in optimizing faculty workload within a college of pharmacy. Since the workload analysis, the faculty service commitment has been substantially changed, by reducing the number of committees at our institution. This type of workload analysis may particularly benefit colleges of pharmacy that employ a team based learning curriculum, with a large time commitment to teaching.

Keywords:  faculty retention; faculty workload; mathematical model; pharmacy faculty

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28090101      PMCID: PMC5221834          DOI: 10.5688/ajpe809152

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ        ISSN: 0002-9459            Impact factor:   2.047


  5 in total

Review 1.  Barriers to scholarship in dentistry, medicine, nursing, and pharmacy practice faculty.

Authors:  Andrea L Smesny; Jennifer S Williams; Gayle A Brazeau; Robert J Weber; Hewitt W Matthews; Sudip K Das
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2007-10-15       Impact factor: 2.047

2.  Team-based learning in US colleges and schools of pharmacy.

Authors:  Rondall E Allen; Jeffrey Copeland; Andrea S Franks; Reza Karimi; Marianne McCollum; David J Riese; Anne Y F Lin
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2013-08-12       Impact factor: 2.047

3.  Job turnover intentions among pharmacy faculty.

Authors:  Mark H Conklin; Shane P Desselle
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2007-08-15       Impact factor: 2.047

4.  Research funding expectations as a function of faculty teaching/administrative workload.

Authors:  Christopher K Surratt; Khalid M Kamal; Peter L D Wildfong
Journal:  Res Social Adm Pharm       Date:  2010-07-23

5.  Integration of team-based learning strategies into a cardiovascular module.

Authors:  Susan E Conway; Jeremy L Johnson; Toni L Ripley
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2010-03-10       Impact factor: 2.047

  5 in total
  2 in total

1.  Facilitating Advancement of Clinical-Track Pharmacy Faculty Members.

Authors:  William Allan Prescott
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 2.047

2.  Pharmacy-related research for health in the Arab region: An analysis informed by WHO's global strategy on research for health.

Authors:  Dalia Bajis; Magda Daifi; Mohamed Ezzat Khamis Amin
Journal:  Explor Res Clin Soc Pharm       Date:  2021-12-14
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.