Arthur Carminucci1, Rachid Assina2, R Nick Hernandez2, Ira M Goldstein2. 1. Department of Neurological Surgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey, USA. Electronic address: carminas@njms.rutgers.edu. 2. Department of Neurological Surgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Traumatic burst fractures of the lumbar spine can result in significant neurologic injury and mechanical instability. The ideal surgical approach for the treatment of unstable lumbar spine burst fractures remains debatable. CASE DESCRIPTION: A 37-year-old man presented with severe neurologic injury including loss of motor function below the level of the iliopsoas muscles bilaterally, saddle anesthesia, and absent rectal tone, after a fall from 18.28 m (60 ft). Computed tomography showed an L4 vertebral body comminuted burst fracture with complete posterior translation of L4 over L5. The patient was taken to the operating room for an L4 corpectomy and L2-S1 posterior fusion. The L4 vertebral body was visualized posterior to the posterior elements of L5 and resected in a piecemeal fashion. Because the thecal sac had been completely transected, a visible path down the L3-L4 and L4-L5 disk spaces was apparent, allowing direct posterior discectomies at these levels and completion of the L4 segment resection. The use of a direct posterior approach resulted in minimal blood loss, correction of sagittal alignment, and satisfactory outcomes comparable with the standard posterior transpedicular approach. Construct stability and solid bony fusion have been maintained for 4 years postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: The use of a direct midline posterior corpectomy approach may be considered for patients with lumbar burst fractures, high-grade neurologic injury, and transection of the thecal sac.
BACKGROUND:Traumatic burst fractures of the lumbar spine can result in significant neurologic injury and mechanical instability. The ideal surgical approach for the treatment of unstable lumbar spine burst fractures remains debatable. CASE DESCRIPTION: A 37-year-old man presented with severe neurologic injury including loss of motor function below the level of the iliopsoas muscles bilaterally, saddle anesthesia, and absent rectal tone, after a fall from 18.28 m (60 ft). Computed tomography showed an L4 vertebral body comminuted burst fracture with complete posterior translation of L4 over L5. The patient was taken to the operating room for an L4 corpectomy and L2-S1 posterior fusion. The L4 vertebral body was visualized posterior to the posterior elements of L5 and resected in a piecemeal fashion. Because the thecal sac had been completely transected, a visible path down the L3-L4 and L4-L5 disk spaces was apparent, allowing direct posterior discectomies at these levels and completion of the L4 segment resection. The use of a direct posterior approach resulted in minimal blood loss, correction of sagittal alignment, and satisfactory outcomes comparable with the standard posterior transpedicular approach. Construct stability and solid bony fusion have been maintained for 4 years postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: The use of a direct midline posterior corpectomy approach may be considered for patients with lumbar burst fractures, high-grade neurologic injury, and transection of the thecal sac.
Authors: Christoph Wipplinger; Sara Lener; Christoph Orban; Tamara M Wipplinger; Anto Abramovic; Anna Lang; Sebastian Hartmann; Claudius Thomé Journal: Acta Neurochir (Wien) Date: 2022-06-11 Impact factor: 2.816