Literature DB >> 28089441

Prognostic Implications of Monosomies in Patients With Multiple Myeloma.

Sang-Yong Shin1, Hyeon-Seok Eom2, Ji Yeon Sohn1, Hyewon Lee3, Boram Park4, Jungnam Joo4, Ja-Hyun Jang5, Mi-Na Lee6, Jung Kwon Kim1, Sun-Young Kong7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cytogenetic analysis aides in risk stratification for patients with multiple myeloma (MM). Although several cytogenetic aberrations have been reported to be prognostic, less is known about the association between the presence of monosomies and prognosis. The present study evaluated the prevalence and prognostic implications of monosomies in patients with MM.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Karyotypes were determined using conventional cytogenetics and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). The prognostic effect of monosomies was evaluated by comparison with the clinical factors in MM patients with normal karyotypes.
RESULTS: Karyotypes were successfully determined in 167 of the 170 patients with MM. Of these 167 patients, 52 (31.1%) had abnormal karyotypes. Univariable analyses showed that a normal karyotype, hypodiploidy, monosomies of chromosomes 13 and 16, deletion or monosomy of 13q14, and loss of X detected by metaphase analysis were each associated with reduced progression-free survival (P < .05 for each). Univariable analyses showed that a normal karyotype, hypodiploidy, monosomies of chromosomes 13 and 16, deletion or monosomy of 13q14 detected by metaphase analysis and FISH-determined RB1 (13q)/TP53 (17p) deletion were each associated with reduced overall survival (P < .05 for each). Multivariable analysis showed that hypodiploidy detected by metaphase analysis was independently prognostic of shorter progression-free survival (P < .05 for each) and that hypodiploidy, monosomy 16, and loss of Y chromosome and FISH-determined TP53 (17p) deletion were associated with reduced overall survival (P < .05 for each).
CONCLUSION: In addition to known cytogenetic abnormalities, such as monosomy 13, hypodiploidy, and TP53 (17p) deletion, monosomy 16 and loss of the Y chromosome have adverse prognostic implications in patients with MM.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cytogenetics; MM; Monosomy; Prognosis; Survival

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28089441     DOI: 10.1016/j.clml.2016.12.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk        ISSN: 2152-2669


  5 in total

1.  Clinical relevance of PET/CT in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Chaoyu Wang; Ling Wu; Chengtao Sun; Yizhuo Zhang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2019-02-01

2.  Conventional Karyotyping and Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization for Detection of Chromosomal Abnormalities in Multiple Myeloma.

Authors:  Matthew Crabtree; Jennifer Cai; Xin Qing
Journal:  J Hematol       Date:  2022-06-27

3.  The Utilization of Karyotyping, iFISH, and MLPA for the Detection of Recurrence Genetic Aberrations in Multiple Myeloma

Authors:  Suchada Sommaluan; Budsaba Rerkamnuaychoke; Teeraya Pauwilai; Suporn Chancharunee; Preeyaporn Onsod; Pitichai Pornsarayuth; Takol Chareonsirisuthigul; Rachaneekorn Tammachote; Teerapong Siriboonpiputtana
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2017-11-26

4.  hsa_circRNA_101237: A Novel Diagnostic and Prognostic Biomarker and Potential Therapeutic Target for Multiple Myeloma.

Authors:  Xiao Liu; Hao Tang; Jing Liu; Xiang Wang
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2020-03-20       Impact factor: 3.989

5.  Y-chromosome loss is frequent in male renal tumors.

Authors:  Franziska Büscheck; Christoph Fraune; Seyedehmina Garmestani; Ronald Simon; Martina Kluth; Claudia Hube-Magg; Kathrin Ketterer; Christian Eichelberg; Doris Höflmayer; Frank Jacobsen; Corinna Wittmer; Waldemar Wilczak; Guido Sauter; Margit Fisch; Till Eichenauer; Michael Rink
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-02
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.