Literature DB >> 2808938

Patients' and nurses' perceptions of symptom distress in cancer.

S Holmes1, E Eburn.   

Abstract

A modified version of the McCorkle & Young Symptom Distress Scale, based on a linear analogue self-assessment scoring system, was used to assess symptom distress in a heterogeneous sample of 53 cancer patients. The scale was simultaneously completed by the nurses caring for those patients, who were asked to rate the patient according to how they perceived he was feeling with regard to each particular symptom. The scores were compared for congruency. This preliminary study suggests that, although nurses appear able to estimate the degree of distress due to changes in mobility and appearance or the presence of diarrhoea, constipation and tiredness, they are less effective in perceiving the degree of distress due to the less 'visible' symptoms such as pain, nausea, anorexia, sleeping disturbances, concentration and mood. Perhaps surprisingly, the trend was for nurses to overestimate the degree of distress when this was compared with the patients' self-assessment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2808938     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.1989.tb01469.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Adv Nurs        ISSN: 0309-2402            Impact factor:   3.187


  7 in total

1.  Palliative care in primary care: a study to determine whether patients and professionals agree on symptoms.

Authors:  Gail Ewing; Margaret Rogers; Stephen Barclay; Janet McCabe; Anna Martin; Malcolm Campbell; Chris Todd
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 2.  Nursing research into quality of life.

Authors:  G V Padilla; M M Grant; B Ferrell
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 3.  Methodological issues in antiemetic studies.

Authors:  M Aapro
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 3.850

4.  Criterion-based validation of the EORTC QLQ-C36 in advanced melanoma: the CIPS questionnaire and proxy raters.

Authors:  V Sigurdardóttir; Y Brandberg; M Sullivan
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  Utilising handheld computers to monitor and support patients receiving chemotherapy: results of a UK-based feasibility study.

Authors:  N Kearney; L Kidd; M Miller; M Sage; J Khorrami; M McGee; J Cassidy; K Niven; P Gray
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2006-03-09       Impact factor: 3.603

6.  Oncologists' perception of depressive symptoms in patients with advanced cancer: accuracy and relational correlates.

Authors:  Lucie Gouveia; Sophie Lelorain; Anne Brédart; Sylvie Dolbeault; Angélique Bonnaud-Antignac; Florence Cousson-Gélie; Serge Sultan
Journal:  BMC Psychol       Date:  2015-03-11

7.  The psychosocial needs of underserved breast cancer survivors and perspectives of their clinicians and support providers.

Authors:  Kristen J Wells; Julia H Drizin; Amy E Ustjanauskas; Coralia Vázquez-Otero; Tonya M Pan-Weisz; Danielle Ung; Claudia Carrizosa; Christine Laronga; Richard G Roetzheim; Kenneth Johnson; Marilyn Norton; Rosa Cobian Aguilar; Gwendolyn P Quinn
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 3.603

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.