Literature DB >> 2808937

The reflective practitioner in nursing.

J H Powell1.   

Abstract

This work is a study of eight practising registered nurses and their use of reflection-in-action in their everyday work. Schon's work on reflection-in-action forms the theoretical basis, and the research tool uses the work of Mezirow and Lazzara's use of Colaizzi's reduction. The findings are that, of the sample used, reflection-in-action is present extensively in the form of description and of planning of actions, but to a much lesser extent in the area of recognition of value judgements and the areas of reflection-in-action leading to learning taking place. Where these were present, albeit in small quantities, they were almost exclusively confined to the community nurses and the nurse practitioner. The tool also helped determine whether or not practice was founded on the use of nursing research and/or that of other disciplines. In the nurses studied here, this was somewhat erratic. With changes in technology, social and environmental changes, and the advancement of nursing and social science research, it is important for registered nurses to be able to both learn from their everyday work and use knowledge from nursing and other disciplines in this, rather than, as is demonstrated here, separate theory from practice and be relatively unable to learn from their work. In view of the changes presently proposed in nurse education, this work has implications for nurse educators as well as for practising nurses.

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2808937     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.1989.tb01467.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Adv Nurs        ISSN: 0309-2402            Impact factor:   3.187


  6 in total

1.  Gilligan: a voice for nursing?

Authors:  J Harbison
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 2.903

2.  Swedish students' and preceptors' perceptions of what students learn in a six-month advanced pharmacy practice experience.

Authors:  Andy Wallman; Sofia Kälvemark Sporrong; Maria Gustavsson; Asa Kettis Lindblad; Markus Johansson; Lena Ring
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 2.047

3.  Journal writing as a teaching technique to promote reflection.

Authors:  Stacy E Walker
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2006 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.860

4.  Report from the UK and Eire Association of Genetic Nurses and Counsellors (AGNC) supervision working group on genetic counselling supervision.

Authors:  Alison Clarke; Anna Middleton; Lorraine Cowley; Penny Guilbert; Rhona Macleod; Angus Clarke; Van Tran
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  A categorization scheme for assessing pharmacy students' levels of reflection during internships.

Authors:  Andy Wallman; Asa Kettis Lindblad; Stina Hall; Annika Lundmark; Lena Ring
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2008-02-15       Impact factor: 2.047

6.  Improving the teaching skills of residents as tutors/facilitators and addressing the shortage of faculty facilitators for PBL modules.

Authors:  Wasim Jafri; Khalid Mumtaz; William P Burdick; Page S Morahan; Rosslynne Freeman; Tabassum Zehra
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2007-10-08       Impact factor: 2.463

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.