Peter C Westman1, Michael J Lipinski1, Rebecca Torguson1, Ron Waksman2. 1. MedStar Heart and Vascular Institute, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC. 2. MedStar Heart and Vascular Institute, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC. Electronic address: ron.waksman@medstar.net.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Newer P2Y12 inhibitors have more rapid onset of platelet inhibition compared with clopidogrel, especially the intravenous P2Y12 inhibitor cangrelor. Direct comparisons between cangrelor and oral P2Y12 inhibitors ticagrelor and prasugrel do not exist. Thus, we performed a network meta-analysis to directly and indirectly compare different P2Y12 inhibitors in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS: MEDLINE/PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared at least two P2Y12 inhibitors including cangrelor, clopidogrel, prasugrel, and ticagrelor. Network meta-analysis with a Bayesian approach was performed to directly and indirectly compare the effects of the aforementioned P2Y12 inhibitors on clinical outcomes. Odds ratios with credible intervals (OR [CrIs]) were generated with random-effects models to compare outcomes. RESULTS: This analysis included 15 RCTs with 54,025 patients randomized to cangrelor (n=12,475), clopidogrel (n=26,903), prasugrel (n=7455), or ticagrelor (n=7192) at time of PCI. Patients had a mean age of 63±10, 74% were male, and 82% underwent PCI for acute coronary syndrome. No significant differences between cangrelor and clopidogrel were found with respect to cardiovascular death (OR 1.01 [CrI 0.23-4.39]), myocardial infarction (OR 0.94 [CrI 0.69-1.25]), major adverse cardiac events (OR 0.91 [CrI 0.69-1.18]), stent thrombosis (OR 0.66 [CrI 0.37-1.19]), or major bleeding (OR 1.52 [CrI 0.79-2.98]). Rank probability data suggested that ticagrelor and prasugrel were better than cangrelor for reducing ischemic events, though these differences were not significant. CONCLUSION: Despite rapid platelet inhibition provided by cangrelor, newer oral P2Y12 inhibitors such as ticagrelor and prasugrel have comparable clinical outcomes.
BACKGROUND: Newer P2Y12 inhibitors have more rapid onset of platelet inhibition compared with clopidogrel, especially the intravenous P2Y12 inhibitor cangrelor. Direct comparisons between cangrelor and oral P2Y12 inhibitors ticagrelor and prasugrel do not exist. Thus, we performed a network meta-analysis to directly and indirectly compare different P2Y12 inhibitors in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS: MEDLINE/PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared at least two P2Y12 inhibitors including cangrelor, clopidogrel, prasugrel, and ticagrelor. Network meta-analysis with a Bayesian approach was performed to directly and indirectly compare the effects of the aforementioned P2Y12 inhibitors on clinical outcomes. Odds ratios with credible intervals (OR [CrIs]) were generated with random-effects models to compare outcomes. RESULTS: This analysis included 15 RCTs with 54,025 patients randomized to cangrelor (n=12,475), clopidogrel (n=26,903), prasugrel (n=7455), or ticagrelor (n=7192) at time of PCI. Patients had a mean age of 63±10, 74% were male, and 82% underwent PCI for acute coronary syndrome. No significant differences between cangrelor and clopidogrel were found with respect to cardiovascular death (OR 1.01 [CrI 0.23-4.39]), myocardial infarction (OR 0.94 [CrI 0.69-1.25]), major adverse cardiac events (OR 0.91 [CrI 0.69-1.18]), stent thrombosis (OR 0.66 [CrI 0.37-1.19]), or major bleeding (OR 1.52 [CrI 0.79-2.98]). Rank probability data suggested that ticagrelor and prasugrel were better than cangrelor for reducing ischemic events, though these differences were not significant. CONCLUSION: Despite rapid platelet inhibition provided by cangrelor, newer oral P2Y12 inhibitors such as ticagrelor and prasugrel have comparable clinical outcomes.
Authors: Nina Buchtele; Harald Herkner; Christian Schörgenhofer; Anne Merrelaar; Roberta Laggner; Georg Gelbenegger; Alexander O Spiel; Hans Domanovits; Irene Lang; Bernd Jilma; Michael Schwameis Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2020-02-21 Impact factor: 4.241