Literature DB >> 2808912

Normative thresholds in the 8- to 20-kHz range as a function of age.

P G Stelmachowicz1, K A Beauchaine, A Kalberer, W Jesteadt.   

Abstract

Using a prototype high-frequency audiometer, auditory thresholds in the 8- to 20-kHz range were obtained from 240 subjects ranging in age from 10-60 years. These measurements were obtained in interest of developing a normative database for frequencies above 8 kHz, and to evaluate intersubject variability as a function of age. An analysis of variance (ANOVA) revealed significant effects of frequency, age, and sex, and a significant frequency-by-age interaction. The largest changes in sensitivity with age occurred between 40 to 59 years. Below approximately 15 kHz, the intersubject variability of threshold estimates increased as a function of both age and frequency. Further analysis revealed that the age-related changes in variability were related to absolute thresholds rather than to age per se. When data are converted to dB HL (relative to the youngest group tested), the region of maximum hearing loss shifts to lower frequencies with increasing age, and threshold shifts with age are greatest in the 13- to 17-kHz range.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2808912     DOI: 10.1121/1.398698

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  21 in total

1.  Utility of monaural spectral cues is enhanced in the presence of cues to sound-source lateral angle.

Authors:  Russell L Martin; Miles Paterson; Ken I McAnally
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2003-12-18

Review 2.  Drug-Induced Ototoxicity: Diagnosis and Monitoring.

Authors:  Kathleen C M Campbell; Colleen G Le Prell
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 5.606

3.  Temporary threshold shift after impulse-noise during video game play: laboratory data.

Authors:  C Spankovich; S K Griffiths; E Lobariñas; K E Morgenstein; S de la Calle; V Ledon; D Guercio; C G Le Prell
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 2.117

4.  Comparison of nine methods to estimate ear-canal stimulus levels.

Authors:  Natalie N Souza; Sumitrajit Dhar; Stephen T Neely; Jonathan H Siegel
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Behavioral hearing thresholds between 0.125 and 20 kHz using depth-compensated ear simulator calibration.

Authors:  Jungmee Lee; Sumitrajit Dhar; Rebekah Abel; Renee Banakis; Evan Grolley; Jungwha Lee; Steven Zecker; Jonathan Siegel
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2012 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 6.  Are some people suffering as a result of increasing mass exposure of the public to ultrasound in air?

Authors:  T G Leighton
Journal:  Proc Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.704

7.  Spectro-temporal characteristics of speech at high frequencies, and the potential for restoration of audibility to people with mild-to-moderate hearing loss.

Authors:  Brian C J Moore; Michael A Stone; Christian Füllgrabe; Brian R Glasberg; Sunil Puria
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  High-frequency click-evoked otoacoustic emissions and behavioral thresholds in humans.

Authors:  Shawn S Goodman; Denis F Fitzpatrick; John C Ellison; Walt Jesteadt; Douglas H Keefe
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Extended high-frequency thresholds in college students: effects of music player use and other recreational noise.

Authors:  Colleen G Le Prell; Christopher Spankovich; Edward Lobariñas; Scott K Griffiths
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 1.664

Review 10.  Are dental hygienists at risk for noise-induced hearing loss? A literature review.

Authors:  Kelsey Henneberry; Shannon Hilland; S Kimberly Haslam
Journal:  Can J Dent Hyg       Date:  2021-06-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.