Literature DB >> 28088865

Mass Spectrometry of Intact Proteins Reveals +98 u Chemical Artifacts Following Precipitation in Acetone.

Melda Z Güray1, Shi Zheng1, Alan A Doucette1.   

Abstract

Protein precipitation in acetone is frequently employed ahead of mass spectrometry for sample preconcentration and purification. Unfortunately, acetone is not chemically inert; mass artifacts have previously been observed on glycine-containing peptides when exposed to acetone under acidic conditions. We herein report a distinct chemical modification occurring at the level of intact proteins when incubated in acetone. This artifact manifests as one or more satellite peaks in the MS spectrum of intact protein, spaced 98 u above the mass of the unmodified protein. Other artifacts (+84, +112 u) also appear upon incubation of proteins or peptides in acetone. The reaction is pH-sensitive, being suppressed when proteins are exposed to acetone under acidic conditions. The +98 u artifact is speculated to originate through an intermediate product of aldol condensation of acetone to form diacetone alcohol and mesityl oxide. A +98 u product could originate from nucleophilic attack on mesityl oxide or through condensation with diacetone alcohol. Given the extent of modification possible upon exposure of proteins to acetone, particularly following overnight solvent exposure or incubation at room temperature, an awareness of the variables influencing this novel modification is valued by proteomics researchers who employ acetone precipitation for protein purification.

Entities:  

Keywords:  98 u; acetone; aldol; diacetone alcohol; mass artifact; mesityl oxide; protein modification

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28088865     DOI: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.6b00841

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Proteome Res        ISSN: 1535-3893            Impact factor:   4.466


  7 in total

1.  Methods for Proteomic Analyses of Mycobacteria.

Authors:  Carolina Mehaffy; Megan Lucas; Nicole A Kruh-Garcia; Karen M Dobos
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2021

2.  Proteoform Suite: Software for Constructing, Quantifying, and Visualizing Proteoform Families.

Authors:  Anthony J Cesnik; Michael R Shortreed; Leah V Schaffer; Rachel A Knoener; Brian L Frey; Mark Scalf; Stefan K Solntsev; Yunxiang Dai; Audrey P Gasch; Lloyd M Smith
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 4.466

3.  Elucidating Escherichia coli Proteoform Families Using Intact-Mass Proteomics and a Global PTM Discovery Database.

Authors:  Yunxiang Dai; Michael R Shortreed; Mark Scalf; Brian L Frey; Anthony J Cesnik; Stefan Solntsev; Leah V Schaffer; Lloyd M Smith
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2017-11-03       Impact factor: 4.466

Review 4.  Best practices and benchmarks for intact protein analysis for top-down mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Daniel P Donnelly; Catherine M Rawlins; Caroline J DeHart; Luca Fornelli; Luis F Schachner; Ziqing Lin; Jennifer L Lippens; Krishna C Aluri; Richa Sarin; Bifan Chen; Carter Lantz; Wonhyeuk Jung; Kendall R Johnson; Antonius Koller; Jeremy J Wolff; Iain D G Campuzano; Jared R Auclair; Alexander R Ivanov; Julian P Whitelegge; Ljiljana Paša-Tolić; Julia Chamot-Rooke; Paul O Danis; Lloyd M Smith; Yury O Tsybin; Joseph A Loo; Ying Ge; Neil L Kelleher; Jeffrey N Agar
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2019-06-27       Impact factor: 28.547

5.  Solvent Precipitation SP3 (SP4) Enhances Recovery for Proteomics Sample Preparation without Magnetic Beads.

Authors:  Harvey E Johnston; Kranthikumar Yadav; Joanna M Kirkpatrick; George S Biggs; David Oxley; Holger B Kramer; Rahul S Samant
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 8.008

6.  In Search of a Universal Method: A Comparative Survey of Bottom-Up Proteomics Sample Preparation Methods.

Authors:  Gina Varnavides; Moritz Madern; Dorothea Anrather; Natascha Hartl; Wolfgang Reiter; Markus Hartl
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2022-08-25       Impact factor: 5.370

7.  Construction of Human Proteoform Families from 21 Tesla Fourier Transform Ion Cyclotron Resonance Mass Spectrometry Top-Down Proteomic Data.

Authors:  Leah V Schaffer; Lissa C Anderson; David S Butcher; Michael R Shortreed; Rachel M Miller; Caitlin Pavelec; Lloyd M Smith
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 4.466

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.