Literature DB >> 28088797

Automated Interpretation of Pulmonary Function Tests in Adults with Respiratory Complaints.

Marko Topalovic1, Stefan Laval, Jean-Marie Aerts, Thierry Troosters, Marc Decramer, Wim Janssens.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The use of pulmonary function tests is primarily based on expert opinion and international guidelines. Current interpretation strategies are using predefined cutoffs for the description of a typical pattern.
OBJECTIVES: We aimed to explore the predicted disease outcome based on the American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society (ATS/ERS) interpreting strategy. Subsequently, we investigated whether an unbiased machine learning framework integrating lung function with clinical variables may provide alternative decision trees resulting in a more accurate diagnosis.
METHODS: Our study included data from 968 subjects admitted for the first time to a pulmonary practice. The final clinical diagnosis was based on the combination of complete pulmonary function with the investigations that were decided at the physician's discretion. Clinical diagnoses were separated into 10 different groups and validated by an expert panel.
RESULTS: The ATS/ERS algorithm resulted in a correct diagnostic label in 38% of the subjects. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) was detected with an acceptable accuracy (74%), whereas all other diseases were poorly identified. The new data-based decision tree improved the general accuracy to 68% after 10-fold cross-validation when detecting the most common lung diseases, with a significantly higher positive predictive value and sensitivity for COPD, asthma, interstitial lung disease, and neuromuscular disorder (83/78, 66/82, 52/59, and 100/54%, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Our data show that the current algorithms for lung function interpretation can be improved by a computer-based choice of lung function and clinical variables and their decision-making thresholds.
© 2017 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28088797     DOI: 10.1159/000454956

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Respiration        ISSN: 0025-7931            Impact factor:   3.580


  9 in total

1.  Artificial Intelligence in COPD: New Venues to Study a Complex Disease.

Authors:  Raúl San José Estépar
Journal:  Barc Respir Netw Rev       Date:  2020 May-Dec

2.  Prediction of Pulmonary Function in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Correlation with Quantitative CT Parameters.

Authors:  Hyun Jung Koo; Sang Min Lee; Joon Beom Seo; Sang Min Lee; Namkug Kim; Sang Young Oh; Jae Seung Lee; Yeon Mok Oh
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 3.500

3.  Erroneous computer-based interpretations of atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter in a Swedish primary health care setting.

Authors:  Thomas Lindow; Josefine Kron; Hans Thulesius; Erik Ljungström; Olle Pahlm
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  2019-11-04       Impact factor: 2.581

4.  Quality Standard Position Statements for Health System Policy Changes in Diagnosis and Management of COPD: A Global Perspective.

Authors:  Mohit Bhutani; David B Price; Tonya A Winders; Heinrich Worth; Kevin Gruffydd-Jones; Ruth Tal-Singer; Jaime Correia-de-Sousa; Mark T Dransfield; Rudi Peché; Daiana Stolz; John R Hurst
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2022-04-28       Impact factor: 4.070

5.  Automated interpretation of the pulmonary function test by a portable spirometer in Chinese adults.

Authors:  Jun Zhou; Ping Wang; Leixin Guo; Jin Cao; Min Zhou; Ranran Dai
Journal:  Clin Respir J       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 1.761

6.  Application of Machine Learning in Pulmonary Function Assessment Where Are We Now and Where Are We Going?

Authors:  Paresh C Giri; Anand M Chowdhury; Armando Bedoya; Hengji Chen; Hyun Suk Lee; Patty Lee; Craig Henriquez; Neil R MacIntyre; Yuh-Chin T Huang
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 4.566

Review 7.  Personalized medicine for patients with COPD: where are we?

Authors:  Frits Me Franssen; Peter Alter; Nadav Bar; Birke J Benedikter; Stella Iurato; Dieter Maier; Michael Maxheim; Fabienne K Roessler; Martijn A Spruit; Claus F Vogelmeier; Emiel Fm Wouters; Bernd Schmeck
Journal:  Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis       Date:  2019-07-09

Review 8.  Machine Learning for Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Eric Mlodzinski; David J Stone; Leo A Celi
Journal:  Pulm Ther       Date:  2020-02-05

Review 9.  Artificial intelligence in pulmonary medicine: computer vision, predictive model and COVID-19.

Authors:  Danai Khemasuwan; Jeffrey S Sorensen; Henri G Colt
Journal:  Eur Respir Rev       Date:  2020-10-01
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.