H Dupont1,2, L Massias3,4, B Jung5, N Ammenouche1, P Montravers6. 1. Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, CHU Amiens Picardie, Amiens, France. 2. INSERM UMR 1088, University of Picardy Jules Verne, Amiens, France. 3. Pharmacology-Toxicology Laboratory, CHU Bichat Claude Bernard, Paris, France. 4. IAME, UMR 1137, University Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France. 5. Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, CHU Saint-Eloi, Montpellier, France. 6. Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, CHU Bichat Claude Bernard, Paris, France.
Abstract
Background: Only limited pharmacokinetic data are available for anidulafungin in ICU patients, especially in patients treated for severe intra-abdominal infection (IAI). Methods: This was a prospective multicentre observational study in ICU patients with suspected yeast IAI. All patients received an intravenous loading dose of 200 mg of anidulafungin, followed by 100 mg/day. Thirteen blood samples were drawn between day 1 and day 5 for pharmacokinetic analysis. Samples were analysed by an HPLC-tandem MS method. Demographics and SAPS2 and SOFA scores were recorded. Results: Fourteen patients with a median age (IQR) of 62 years (48-70) and with a mean BMI of 30.5 kg/m 2 were included from three centres; 57.1% were women. Their median (IQR) SAPS2 score was 54 (45-67) and their median (IQR) SOFA score was 8 (7-12). Six patients with community-acquired IAI and eight patients with nosocomial-acquired IAI were included. Twelve yeasts were isolated: six Candida albicans , two Candida glabrata , two Candida tropicalis , one Candida parapsilosis and one Candida krusei . Pharmacokinetic parameters were as follows [mean (% coefficient of variation)]: C max (mg/L) = 6.0 (29%); T max (h) = 1.6 (25.8%); C min (mg/L) = 3.2 (36.8%); AUC 0-24 (mg·h/L) = 88.9 (38.6%); t 1/2 (h) = 42.1 (68.2%); CL (L/h) = 1.2 (42.3%); and V (L) = 72.8 (87.8%). A two-compartment model best described the anidulafungin concentrations in the population pharmacokinetic study. Conclusions: The pharmacokinetic parameters of anidulafungin in critically ill ICU patients with complicated IAI are similar to those observed in the literature. However, an increased V and a longer t 1/2 were observed in this study. (EudraCT No. 2010-018695-25).
Background: Only limited pharmacokinetic data are available for anidulafungin in ICU patients, especially in patients treated for severe intra-abdominal infection (IAI). Methods: This was a prospective multicentre observational study in ICU patients with suspected yeast IAI. All patients received an intravenous loading dose of 200 mg of anidulafungin, followed by 100 mg/day. Thirteen blood samples were drawn between day 1 and day 5 for pharmacokinetic analysis. Samples were analysed by an HPLC-tandem MS method. Demographics and SAPS2 and SOFA scores were recorded. Results: Fourteen patients with a median age (IQR) of 62 years (48-70) and with a mean BMI of 30.5 kg/m 2 were included from three centres; 57.1% were women. Their median (IQR) SAPS2 score was 54 (45-67) and their median (IQR) SOFA score was 8 (7-12). Six patients with community-acquired IAI and eight patients with nosocomial-acquired IAI were included. Twelve yeasts were isolated: six Candida albicans , two Candida glabrata , two Candida tropicalis , one Candida parapsilosis and one Candida krusei . Pharmacokinetic parameters were as follows [mean (% coefficient of variation)]: C max (mg/L) = 6.0 (29%); T max (h) = 1.6 (25.8%); C min (mg/L) = 3.2 (36.8%); AUC 0-24 (mg·h/L) = 88.9 (38.6%); t 1/2 (h) = 42.1 (68.2%); CL (L/h) = 1.2 (42.3%); and V (L) = 72.8 (87.8%). A two-compartment model best described the anidulafungin concentrations in the population pharmacokinetic study. Conclusions: The pharmacokinetic parameters of anidulafungin in critically ill ICUpatients with complicated IAI are similar to those observed in the literature. However, an increased V and a longer t 1/2 were observed in this study. (EudraCT No. 2010-018695-25).
Authors: Ignacio Martin-Loeches; Massimo Antonelli; Manuel Cuenca-Estrella; George Dimopoulos; Sharon Einav; Jan J De Waele; Jose Garnacho-Montero; Souha S Kanj; Flavia R Machado; Philippe Montravers; Yasser Sakr; Maurizio Sanguinetti; Jean-Francois Timsit; Matteo Bassetti Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2019-03-25 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Daniela Baracaldo-Santamaría; Juan David Cala-Garcia; Germán José Medina-Rincón; Luis Carlos Rojas-Rodriguez; Carlos-Alberto Calderon-Ospina Journal: Antibiotics (Basel) Date: 2022-05-12
Authors: René Welte; Herbert Oberacher; Tiziana Gasperetti; Hartwig Pfisterer; Andrea Griesmacher; Tobias Santner; Cornelia Lass-Flörl; Caroline Hörtnagl; Sandra Leitner-Rupprich; Maria Aigner; Ingo Lorenz; Stefan Schmid; Michael Edlinger; Philipp Eller; Daniel Dankl; Michael Joannidis; Romuald Bellmann Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2021-06-17 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Gabriele Sganga; Minggui Wang; M Rita Capparella; Margaret Tawadrous; Jean L Yan; Jalal A Aram; Philippe Montravers Journal: Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis Date: 2019-07-06 Impact factor: 3.267
Authors: Tobias Lahmer; Gonzalo Batres Baires; Roland M Schmid; Johannes R Wiessner; Jörg Ulrich; Maximilian Reichert; Wolfgang Huber; Fritz Sörgel; Martina Kinzig; Sebastian Rasch; Ulrich Mayr Journal: J Fungi (Basel) Date: 2021-05-11