Literature DB >> 28087944

Laboratory Diagnosis and Susceptibility Testing for Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

Gary W Procop.   

Abstract

The laboratory, which utilizes some of the most sophisticated and rapidly changing technologies, plays a critical role in the diagnosis of tuberculosis. Some of these tools are being employed in resource-challenged countries for the rapid detection and characterization of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Foremost, the laboratory defines appropriate specimen criteria for optimal test performance. The direct detection of mycobacteria in the clinical specimen, predominantly done by acid-fast staining, may eventually be replaced by rapid-cycle PCR. The widespread use of the Xpert MTB/RIF (Cepheid) assay, which detects both M. tuberculosis and key genetic determinants of rifampin resistance, is important for the early detection of multidrug-resistant strains. Culture, using both broth and solid media, remains the standard for establishing the laboratory-based diagnosis of tuberculosis. Cultured isolates are identified far less commonly by traditional biochemical profiling and more commonly by molecular methods, such as DNA probes and broad-range PCR with DNA sequencing. Non-nucleic acid-based methods of identification, such as high-performance liquid chromatography and, more recently, matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry, may also be used for identification. Cultured isolates of M. tuberculosis should be submitted for susceptibility testing according to standard guidelines. The use of broth-based susceptibility testing is recommended to significantly decrease the time to result. Cultured isolates may also be submitted for strain typing for epidemiologic purposes. The use of massive parallel sequencing, also known as next-generation sequencing, promises to continue to this molecular revolution in mycobacteriology, as whole-genome sequencing provides identification, susceptibility, and typing information simultaneously.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28087944     DOI: 10.1128/microbiolspec.TNMI7-0022-2016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microbiol Spectr        ISSN: 2165-0497


  5 in total

1.  Use of Nucleic Acid Amplification Testing for Rapid Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Complex Among US Tuberculosis Patients, 2011‒2017.

Authors:  Varsha Kumar; Tracy L Dalton; Lori R Armstrong; Amy Whitesell; Rongxia Li; Angela M Starks
Journal:  Open Forum Infect Dis       Date:  2021-10-20       Impact factor: 4.423

2.  Parallel Tests Using Culture, Xpert MTB/RIF, and SAT-TB in Sputum Plus Bronchial Alveolar Lavage Fluid Significantly Increase Diagnostic Performance of Smear-Negative Pulmonary Tuberculosis.

Authors:  Lin Fan; Danfeng Li; Shaojun Zhang; Lan Yao; Xiaohui Hao; Jin Gu; Hong Li; Jinxia Niu; Zhemin Zhang; Changtai Zhu
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 5.640

3.  Novel Potential Diagnostic Serum Biomarkers of Metabolomics in Osteoarticular Tuberculosis Patients: A Preliminary Study.

Authors:  Ximeng Chen; Jingyun Ye; Hong Lei; Chengbin Wang
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2022-03-25       Impact factor: 5.293

Review 4.  Review and Updates on the Diagnosis of Tuberculosis.

Authors:  Yi Huang; Lin Ai; Xiaochen Wang; Ziyong Sun; Feng Wang
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-09-30       Impact factor: 4.964

5.  Comparison between Ogawa-Kudoh and modified Petroff techniques for mycobacteria cultivation in the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis.

Authors:  Ronaldo Rodrigues da Costa; Suzane Fernandes da Silva; Romário Costa Fochat; Raquel Leite Macedo; Thamiris Vilela Pereira; Marcio Roberto Silva; Carmen Perches Gomide Pinto; Isabel Cristina Gonçalves Leite
Journal:  Einstein (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2018-06-11
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.