Literature DB >> 28087720

A liminal stage after predictive testing for Huntington disease.

Marcela Gargiulo1,2,3, Sophie Tezenas du Montcel4,5, Marie France Jutras6, Ariane Herson2,3, Cecile Cazeneuve3, Alexandra Durr3,7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Following predictive testing for Huntington disease (HD), knowledge of one's carrier status may have consequences on disease onset. Our study aimed to address two questions. First, does knowledge of being a carrier of the pathological HD mutation trigger onset of the disease? Second, does this knowledge influence self-awareness and allow carriers to identify signs and symptoms of disease onset?
METHODS: Between 2012 and 2015, 75 HD mutation carriers were examined using the Unified Huntington's Disease Rating Scale (UHDRS) motor score. Onset estimation made with the disease burden score was compared with UHDRS findings. We collected qualitative data with questionnaires and semistructured interviews.
RESULTS: 38 women and 37 men, aged 43.7 years±10.5 (20-68), were interviewed after a mean delay between test and study interview of 10.5 years±4.7 (from 4 to 21 years). Estimation of age at onset was 4.5±8.5 years earlier than data-derived age at onset. Participants were categorised according to their motor score: scores <5 were premanifest (n=35), and scores >5 were manifest carriers (n=40). Self-observation was a major preoccupation for all, independent of their clinical status (82% vs 74%, p=0.57). Among manifest carriers, 56% thought they showed symptoms, but only 33% felt ill. Interestingly, this was also observed in those without motor signs (20% and 9%). Being a mutation carrier did not significantly facilitate recognition of motor signs. Interviews with premanifest carriers allowed the burden of self-observation to be illustrated despite lack of motor signs.
CONCLUSIONS: Estimating age at onset based on disease burden score may not be accurate. The transition to disease was experienced as an ambiguous or liminal experience. The view of mutation carriers is not always concordant with medical onset estimation, highlighting the difficulties involved in the concept of onset and its use as an outcome in future disease-modifying trials. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ethics; Genetic screening/counselling; Neurology

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28087720     DOI: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2016-104199

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Genet        ISSN: 0022-2593            Impact factor:   6.318


  3 in total

1.  Genetic Testing in Prion Disease: Psychological Consequences of the Decisions to Know or Not to Know.

Authors:  Mathias Schwartz; Jean-Philippe Brandel; Marie Lise Babonneau; Christilla Boucher; Elodie Schaerer; Stephane Haik; Jean Louis Laplanche; Marcela Gargiulo; Alexandra Durr
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2019-09-20       Impact factor: 4.599

2.  Who and Why? Requests for Presymptomatic Genetic Testing for Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis/Frontotemporal Dementia vs Huntington Disease.

Authors:  Maria Del Mar Amador; Marcela Gargiulo; Christilla Boucher; Ariane Herson; Stéphanie Staraci; François Salachas; Fabienne Clot; Cécile Cazeneuve; Isabelle Le Ber; Alexandra Durr
Journal:  Neurol Genet       Date:  2020-12-24

3.  A Lacanian Approach to Medical Demand, With a Focus on Pediatric Genetics: A Plea for Subjectivization.

Authors:  Rémy Potier; Olivier Putois
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-11-01
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.