| Literature DB >> 28087644 |
Maitreyee Hazarika1, Meredith K Chuk2, Marc R Theoret2, Sirisha Mushti3, Kun He3, Shawna L Weis2, Alexander H Putman2, Whitney S Helms2, Xianhua Cao4, Hongshan Li4, Hong Zhao4, Liang Zhao4, Joel Welch5, Laurie Graham5, Meredith Libeg2, Rajeshwari Sridhara3, Patricia Keegan2, Richard Pazdur2.
Abstract
On December 22, 2014, the FDA granted accelerated approval to nivolumab (OPDIVO; Bristol-Myers Squibb) for the treatment of patients with unresectable or metastatic melanoma and disease progression following ipilimumab and, if BRAF V600 mutation positive, a BRAF inhibitor. Approval was based on a clinically meaningful, durable objective response rate (ORR) in a non-comparative analysis of 120 patients who received 3 mg/kg of nivolumab intravenously every 2 weeks with at least 6-month follow-up in an ongoing, randomized, open-label, active-controlled clinical trial. The ORR as assessed by a blinded independent review committee per RECIST v1.1 was 31.7% (95% confidence interval, 23.5-40.8). Ongoing responses were observed in 87% of responding patients, ranging from 2.6+ to 10+ months. In 13 patients, the response duration was 6 months or longer. The risks of nivolumab, including clinically significant immune-mediated adverse reactions (imARs), were assessed in 268 patients who received at least one dose of nivolumab. The FDA review considered whether the ORR and durations of responses were reasonably likely to predict clinical benefit, the adequacy of the safety database, and systematic approaches to the identification, description, and patient management for imARs in product labeling. Clin Cancer Res; 23(14); 3484-8. ©2017 AACR. ©2017 American Association for Cancer Research.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28087644 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-0712
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Cancer Res ISSN: 1078-0432 Impact factor: 12.531