Literature DB >> 28087052

Contraceptive Practices of Women With Complex Congenital Heart Disease.

Pamela D Miner1, Mary M Canobbio2, Dorothy D Pearson3, Mary Schlater4, Yvonne Balon5, Kathryn J Junge6, Ami Bhatt7, Deena Barber8, Michelle J Nickolaus9, Adrienne H Kovacs10, Philip Moons11, Kate Shaw12, Susan M Fernandes13.   

Abstract

Understanding the contraceptive practices of women with complex congenital heart disease (CHD) and providing them individualized contraception counseling may prevent adverse events and unplanned high-risk pregnancies. Given this, we sought to examine the contraceptive practices in women with CHD, describe adverse events associated with contraceptive use, and describe the provision of contraception counseling. Women >18 years were recruited from 2011 to 2014 from 9 adult CHD (ACHD) centers throughout North America. Subjects completed a 48-item questionnaire regarding contraceptive use and perceptions of contraception counseling, and a medical record review was performed. Of 505 subjects, median age was 33 (interquartile range 26 to 44) and 81% had CHD of moderate or great complexity. The majority (86%, 435 of 505) of the cohort had used contraception. The types included barrier methods (87%), oral contraception (OC) 84%, intrauterine device (18%), Depo-Provera (15%), vaginal ring (7%), patch (6%), hormonal implant (2%), Plan B (19%), and sterilization (16%). Overall OC use was not significantly different by CHD complexity. Women with CHD of great complexity were more likely to report a thrombotic event while taking OC than those with less complex CHD (9% vs 1%, p = 0.003). Contraception counseling by the ACHD team was noted by 43% of subjects. Unplanned pregnancy was reported by 25% with no statistical difference by CHD complexity. In conclusion, contraceptive practices of women with complex CHD are highly variable, and the prevalence of blood clots while taking OC is not insignificant while provision of contraception counseling by ACHD providers appears lacking.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28087052     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.11.047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  6 in total

1.  Contraceptive methods of privately insured US women with congenital heart defects.

Authors:  Kayla N Anderson; Naomi K Tepper; Karrie Downing; Elizabeth C Ailes; Ginnie Abarbanell; Sherry L Farr
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2020-01-21       Impact factor: 4.749

2.  Adolescent Women with Congenital Heart Disease: Self-Reported Reproductive Health Discussions with Health Care Providers.

Authors:  Amy J Katz; Shannon Lyon; Anne G Farrell; Nayan Srivastava; Tracey A Wilkinson; Marcia L Shew
Journal:  J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 2.046

3.  Safety of contraceptive use among women with congenital heart disease: A systematic review.

Authors:  Ginnie Abarbanell; Naomi K Tepper; Sherry L Farr
Journal:  Congenit Heart Dis       Date:  2019-01-25       Impact factor: 2.007

4.  Receipt of American Heart Association-Recommended Preconception Health Care Among Privately Insured Women With Congenital Heart Defects, 2007-2013.

Authors:  Sherry L Farr; Karrie F Downing; Elizabeth C Ailes; Michelle Gurvitz; Gretchen Koontz; Emmy L Tran; C J Alverson; Matthew E Oster
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2019-09-12       Impact factor: 5.501

Review 5.  Pregnancy in congenital heart disease: risk prediction and counselling.

Authors:  Iris M van Hagen; Jolien W Roos-Hesselink
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 5.994

6.  Identifying and Responding to the Sexual Reproductive Health Needs of Women with Heart Disease: A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Shahnaz Kohan; Minoo Movahedi; Masoumeh Sadeghi; Nafisehsadat Nekuei
Journal:  Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res       Date:  2022-05-23
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.