| Literature DB >> 28086943 |
Anne Kirstine Eriksen1, Rikke Dalgaard Hansen2, Michael Borre3, Ryan Godsk Larsen4, Jeppe Munthe Jensen5, Kristian Overgaard5, Mette Borre6, Cecilie Kyrø2, Rikard Landberg7,8,9, Anja Olsen2, Anne Tjønneland2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The prognosis for men with non-aggressive prostate cancer is good, and several studies have investigated the impact of lifestyle changes including physical activity and diet on the prognosis. Despite positive results in animal studies and a few human interventions with whole-grain rye on markers of prostate cancer progression, the feasibility of trials investigating such dietary changes in combination with physical activity remains largely unstudied. The primary aim was to investigate the feasibility of an intervention with high whole-grain rye intake and vigorous physical activity for 6 months in men diagnosed with prostate cancer.Entities:
Keywords: Feasibility; Intervention; Physical activity; Prostate cancer; Whole-grain rye
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28086943 PMCID: PMC5237258 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-016-1734-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Trials ISSN: 1745-6215 Impact factor: 2.279
Inclusion and exclusion criteria for study participation in the NILS feasibility study
| Inclusion criteria | Exclusion criteria |
|---|---|
| Biopsy-proven prostate cancer within 2 years prior to enrolment | Less than 10 years of life expectancy |
| PSA ≤ 10, Gleason score ≤ 6, clinical classification ≤ cT2a or PSA ≤ 10, Gleason score ≤ 7, clinical classification ≤ cT2a | Prior history of cancer, except for non-melanoma skin cancer, unless considered cured without signs of treatment failure for at least 5 years |
| Maximum 1/5 tumour-positive biopsy rate | Conditions or behaviours likely to affect the capability of participating fully in the intervention |
| On active surveillance (elected to forgo treatment) | Moderate to severe co-morbidity (kidney, liver, heart, or respiratory problems) |
| Level of testosterone normal in sera | Inflammatory bowel disease or physical handicaps |
| Above 55 and below 70 years of agea | Gluten intolerance |
aWas adjusted to include the age span of 53–72 years
Fig. 1Flowchart of participants and drop-out in the NILS feasibility study
Baseline characteristics for intervention and control group – the NILS feasibility study
| Intervention (n = 14) | Control (n = 7) | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
| |
| Age at baseline (y) | 63 (5) | 63 (5) |
| Age at PC diagnosis (y) | 61 (6) | 63 (6) |
| Weight (kg) | 88 (17) | 83 (10) |
| Height (m) | 1.83 (0.06) | 1.80 (0.04) |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 26.0 (3.4) | 25.6 (2.5) |
| Hip circumference (cm) | 105 (10) | 102 (6) |
| Waist circumference (cm) | 102 (15) | 98 (6) |
| Fat-free mass (kg) | 65 (7) | 64 (6) |
| Fat mass (%) | 25 (6) | 23 (4) |
| VO2 max (ml O2/min/kg) | 29 (7) | 26 (5) |
| Systolic BP (mmHg) | 146 (19) | 142 (13) |
| Diastolic BP (mmHg) | 89 (10) | 87 (8) |
| HDL cholesterol (mmol/L) | 1.3 (0.2) | 1.3 (0.2) |
| LDL cholesterol (mmol/L) | 2.8 (0.7) | 2.9 (0.6) |
| Total cholesterol (mmol/L) | 5.1 (0.7) | 5.3 (0.8) |
| Triglycerides (mmol/L) | 1.3 (0.4) | 1.5 (0.6) |
| Fasting plasma glucose (mmol/L) | 5.8 (0.6) | 6.1 (0.4) |
| Fasting blood glucose (mmol/L) | 5.3 (0.5) | 5.6 (0.5) |
| Blood glucose 2 h (mmol/L) | 6.7 (2.2) | 8.3 (2.0) |
| Fasting insulin (mmol/L) | 11.6 (6.6) | 11.8 (6.8) |
| Alkylresorcinols total (nmol/L) | 109 (98) | 74 (39) |
| C17:C21 alkylresorcinol ratio | 0.39 (0.19) | 0.30 (0.10) |
| Plasma enterolactone (nM) | 51 (51) | 52 (50) |
| Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) (ng/ml) | 5.4 (1.7) | 5.0 (2.2) |
SD standard deviation, PC prostate cancer, BMI body mass index, VO max peak oxygen consumption per unit time, BP blood pressure, HDL high-density lipoprotein, LDL low-density lipoprotein
Reported whole-grain rye intake by Food Frequency Questionnaire (FFQ) for intervention and control group, and rye diary and physical activity for the intervention group only, as well as compliance markers for the intervention and control group, respectively – the NILS feasibility study
| Intervention group (n = 14) | Control group (n = 7) | Difference between groups (95% CI) | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline | 3 months | 6 months | 12 months | Baseline | 3 months | 6 months | 12 months | Baseline–6 months | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Whole-grain rye intake as reported in FFQ (g/day) | 61 (24) | N/A | 91a (33) | 182b (42) | 87a,d (32) | 200b,d (130) | 57 (26) | N/A | 56a (23) | 90b (20) | 54a,e (19) | 128b,e (49) | |
| Compliance markers of whole-grain intake | |||||||||||||
|
| 109 (98) | 197 (87) | 211 (144) | 139d (76) | 74 (39) | 108 (66) | 102 (74) | 109 (55) | 93 (-30;215) | ||||
|
| 0.39 (0.19) | 0.43 (0.17) | 0.42 (0.20) | 0.49d (0.21) | 0.30 (0.10) | 0.32 (0.10) | 0.29 (0.05) | 0.58 (0.25) | 0.08 (-0.07;0.22) | ||||
| Intervention group (n = 14 for whole-grain intake and n = 12 for physical activity measures) | Control group No assessment of whole-grain intake from diaries or physical activity done for the control group | ||||||||||||
| Baseline–3 months | 3–6 months | 12 months | |||||||||||
|
|
| ||||||||||||
| Whole-grain rye intake as reported in diary (g/day) | 146 (19) | 125 (40) | N/A | ||||||||||
|
|
| ||||||||||||
| Physical activity (min/week) | |||||||||||||
|
| 91 (17, 193) | 66 (13, 259) | N/A | ||||||||||
|
| 220 (31, 338) | 150 (66, 319) | N/A | ||||||||||
|
| 285 (58, 452) | 225 (77, 355) | N/A | ||||||||||
SD standard deviation, FFQ food frequency questionnaire, N/A not applicable (not recorded), P5 5th percentile, P95 95th percentile
aRye bread and rye crispbread
bRye bread, rye crispbread, rye breakfast cereals, rye pasta, rye kernels, rye biscuits and øllebrød
dn = 12 in intervention group
en = 6 in control group
Fig. 2Physical activity in the intervention group, by heart rate monitors and diaries, for 26 weeks – the NILS feasibility study
Outcome measures (means with standard deviations) in intervention and control arm participants of the NILS feasibility study at baseline, 3 and 6 months after baseline, and end of follow-up (12 months after baseline)
| Intervention (n = 14) | Control (n = 7) | Difference between groups (95% CI) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline | 3 months | 6 months | 12 monthsa | Baseline | 3 months | 6 months | 12 months | Baseline–6 months | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Physical fitness | |||||||||
| Fat-free mass (kg) | 65 (7) | 66 (9) | 65 (8) | 64 (8) | 64 (6) | N/A | 64 (6) | 63 (6) | -0.2 (-1.5, 1.1) |
| Fat mass (%) | 25 (6) | 24 (5) | 24 (6) | 23 (5) | 23 (4) | N/A | 23 (5) | 23 (5) | -0.5 (-2.4, 1.5) |
| VO2 peak (ml O2/min/kg) | 29 (7) | 32 (7)b | 32 (7) | 33 (6)c | 26 (5) | N/A | 27 (5) | 28 (6)d | 2.8 (0.1, 5.4) |
| Cardio-metabolic outcomes | |||||||||
| BMI (kg/m2) | 26.0 (3.4) | 25.8 (3.3) | 25.7 (3.4) | 25.0 (3.0) | 25.6 (2.5) | 25.6 (2.9) | 25.4 (2.6) | 25.4 (2.6) | -0.2 (-0.9, 0.6) |
| Waist circumference (cm) | 102 (15) | 99 (14) | 100 (13) | 95 (10) | 98 (6) | N/A | 99 (5) | 97 (4) | -3 (-7, 1) |
| HDL cholesterol (mmol/L) | 1.3 (0.2) | 1.3 (0.3) | 1.3 (0.2) | 1.4 (0.3) | 1.3 (0.2) | 1.3 (0.1) | 1.4 (0.2) | 1.5 (0.2) | -0.0 (-0.2, 0.1) |
| LDL cholesterol (mmol/L) | 2.8 (0.7) | 2.8 (0.7) | 2.7 (0.7) | 2.8 (0.6) | 2.9 (0.6) | 2.8 (0.7) | 3.1 (0.7) | 3.0 (0.6) | -0.3 (-0.7, 0.0) |
| Total cholesterol (mmol/L) | 5.1 (0.7) | 5.1 (0.7) | 5.0 (0.8) | 5.2 (0.7) | 5.3 (0.8) | 5.3 (1.0) | 5.6 (1.0) | 5.6 (0.9) | -0.4 (-0.8, 0.1) |
| Triglycerides (mmol/L) | 1.3 (0.4) | 1.3 (0.4) | 1.4 (0.6) | 1.3 (0.5) | 1.5 (0.6) | 1.4 (0.4) | 1.3 (0.5) | 1.2 (0.3) | 0.3 (-0.1, 0.7) |
| Fasting plasma glucose (mmol/L) | 5.8 (0.6) | 5.8 (0.4) | 5.8 (0.5) | 5.7 (0.4) | 6.1 (0.4) | 6.1 (0.3) | 6.0 (0.2) | 5.8 (0.3) | -0.1 (-0.5, 0.3) |
| Insulin (mmol/L) | 11.6 (6.5) | 10.2 (6.5) | 11.4 (7.7) | 8.0 (4.1) | 11.8 (6.8) | 15.1 (11.9) | 9.7 (2.7) | 10.2 (8.1) | 1.8 (-2.9, 6.5) |
| Prostate cancer progression | |||||||||
| Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) (ng/ml) | 5.4 (1.7) | 5.0 (2.5) | 5.4 (3.2) | 5.4 (2.2) | 5.0 (2.2) | 4.5 (1.0) | 4.9 (1.6) | 4.7 (1.1) | 0.2 (-2.1, 2.6) |
Difference between group means adjusted for baseline level of outcome (95% CI)
SD standard deviation, N/A not applicable (not recorded), VO peak peak oxygen consumption per unit time, BMI body mass index, HDL high-density lipoprotein, LDL low-density lipoprotein
aEnd of follow-up: n = 12 in intervention group
bn = 13 (one missing due to heart problems)
cn = 11
dn = 6
Fig. 3PSA levels at baseline and 3, 6 and 12 months after baseline in the intervention (a) and the control (b) group in the NILS feasibility study