Irineu Loturco1,2, Lucas A Pereira3, Ronaldo Kobal3, Katia Kitamura3, Cesar C Cal Abad3, Fábio Y Nakamura3,4, Chi N Pai5. 1. Nucleus of High Performance in Sport (NAR), São Paulo, Brazil - irineu.loturco@terra.com.br. 2. Department of Mechatronics Engineering, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil - irineu.loturco@terra.com.br. 3. Nucleus of High Performance in Sport (NAR), São Paulo, Brazil. 4. Department of Physical Education, State University of Londrina, Londrina, Brazil. 5. Department of Mechatronics Engineering, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to compare the predictive value of muscle power (peak power, mean power until the peak-velocity or mean propulsive power) in relation to the jump height achieved during the jump squat performed at different loads. METHODS: One hundred and ninety-four elite athletes performed jump squats against loads corresponding to 40%, 60%, and 80% of their respective body mass. A linear regression analysis was performed to establish the relationship between muscle power expressions and jump squat height. RESULTS: The coefficient of determination (R2) in the different linear regression models between muscle power-related variables and jump squat height, for the different load ranges, varied from 0.50 to 0.57 (for absolute power values) and from 0.72 to 0.78 (for relative power values [W/kg]). The mean propulsive power presented similar capacity to predict the jump squat height as the peak power-related values. For all analyzed variables, this prediction power was increased when the absolute power values were normalized by the individuals' body mass. CONCLUSIONS: Selection of the values related to the mean propulsive phase to assess top-level athletes might be considered as an advantageous alternative, due to its adequacy to properly reflect the neuromuscular potential of the subjects in both ballistic and traditional exercises.
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to compare the predictive value of muscle power (peak power, mean power until the peak-velocity or mean propulsive power) in relation to the jump height achieved during the jump squat performed at different loads. METHODS: One hundred and ninety-four elite athletes performed jump squats against loads corresponding to 40%, 60%, and 80% of their respective body mass. A linear regression analysis was performed to establish the relationship between muscle power expressions and jump squat height. RESULTS: The coefficient of determination (R2) in the different linear regression models between muscle power-related variables and jump squat height, for the different load ranges, varied from 0.50 to 0.57 (for absolute power values) and from 0.72 to 0.78 (for relative power values [W/kg]). The mean propulsive power presented similar capacity to predict the jump squat height as the peak power-related values. For all analyzed variables, this prediction power was increased when the absolute power values were normalized by the individuals' body mass. CONCLUSIONS: Selection of the values related to the mean propulsive phase to assess top-level athletes might be considered as an advantageous alternative, due to its adequacy to properly reflect the neuromuscular potential of the subjects in both ballistic and traditional exercises.
Authors: Joshua F Feuerbacher; Valerian von Schöning; Judith Melcher; Hannah L Notbohm; Nils Freitag; Moritz Schumann Journal: Nutrients Date: 2021-03-03 Impact factor: 5.717