Gunnhild Berdal1, Anne-Lene Sand-Svartrud1,2, Ingvild Bø3, Turid N Dager1,2, Anne Dingsør4, Siv G Eppeland5, Jon Hagfors6, Bente Hamnes7, Merete Nielsen6, Bente Slungaard8, Sigrid H Wigers9, Kåre Birger Hagen1, Hanne S Dagfinrud1, Ingvild Kjeken1. 1. a Department of Rheumatology, Norwegian National Advisory Unit on Rehabilitation in Rheumatology , Diakonhjemmet Hospital , Oslo , Norway. 2. b Department of Rheumatology, Norwegian National Unit for Rehabilitation for Rheumatic Patients , Diakonhjemmet Hospital , Oslo , Norway. 3. c Department of Rehabilitation , Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases , Lillehammer , Norway. 4. d Department of Rheumatology , Betanien Hospital , Skien , Norway. 5. e Department of Rheumatology , Sørlandet Hospital , Arendal , Norway. 6. f The Norwegian Rheumatism Association , Oslo , Norway. 7. g Department of Self-management , Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases , Lillehammer , Norway. 8. h Department of Rheumatology , Martina Hansens Hospital , Bærum , Norway. 9. i Jeløy Kurbad Rehabilitation Center , Moss , Norway.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To explore and describe rehabilitation goals of patients with rheumatic diseases during rehabilitation stays, and examine whether goal content changed from admission to discharge. METHOD: Fifty-two participants were recruited from six rehabilitation centers in Norway. Goals were formulated by the participants during semi-structured goal-setting conversations with health professionals trained in motivational interviewing. An inductive qualitative content analysis was conducted to classify and quantify the expressed goals. Changes in goal content from admission to discharge were calculated as percentage differences. Goal content was explored across demographic and contextual characteristics. RESULTS: A total of 779 rehabilitation goals were classified into 35 categories, within nine overarching dimensions. These goals varied and covered a wide range of topics. Most common at admission were goals concerning healthy lifestyle, followed by goals concerning symptoms, managing everyday life, adaptation, disease management, social life, and knowledge. At discharge, goals about knowledge and symptoms decreased considerably, and goals about healthy lifestyle and adaptation increased. The health profession involved and patient gender influenced goal content. CONCLUSIONS: The rehabilitation goals of the patients with rheumatic diseases were found to be wide-ranging, with healthy lifestyle as the most prominent focus. Goal content changed between admission to, and discharge from, rehabilitation stays. Implications for rehabilitation Rehabilitation goals set by patients with rheumatic diseases most frequently concern healthy lifestyle changes, yet span a wide range of topics. Patient goals vary by gender and are influenced by the profession of the health care worker involved in the goal-setting process. To meet the diversity of patient needs, health professionals need to be aware of their potential influence on the actual goal-setting task, which may limit the range of topics patients present when they are asked to set rehabilitation goals. The proposed framework for classifying goal content has the capacity to detect changes in goals occurring during the rehabilitation process, and may be used as a clinical tool during goal-setting conversations for this patient group.
PURPOSE: To explore and describe rehabilitation goals of patients with rheumatic diseases during rehabilitation stays, and examine whether goal content changed from admission to discharge. METHOD: Fifty-two participants were recruited from six rehabilitation centers in Norway. Goals were formulated by the participants during semi-structured goal-setting conversations with health professionals trained in motivational interviewing. An inductive qualitative content analysis was conducted to classify and quantify the expressed goals. Changes in goal content from admission to discharge were calculated as percentage differences. Goal content was explored across demographic and contextual characteristics. RESULTS: A total of 779 rehabilitation goals were classified into 35 categories, within nine overarching dimensions. These goals varied and covered a wide range of topics. Most common at admission were goals concerning healthy lifestyle, followed by goals concerning symptoms, managing everyday life, adaptation, disease management, social life, and knowledge. At discharge, goals about knowledge and symptoms decreased considerably, and goals about healthy lifestyle and adaptation increased. The health profession involved and patient gender influenced goal content. CONCLUSIONS: The rehabilitation goals of the patients with rheumatic diseases were found to be wide-ranging, with healthy lifestyle as the most prominent focus. Goal content changed between admission to, and discharge from, rehabilitation stays. Implications for rehabilitation Rehabilitation goals set by patients with rheumatic diseases most frequently concern healthy lifestyle changes, yet span a wide range of topics. Patient goals vary by gender and are influenced by the profession of the health care worker involved in the goal-setting process. To meet the diversity of patient needs, health professionals need to be aware of their potential influence on the actual goal-setting task, which may limit the range of topics patients present when they are asked to set rehabilitation goals. The proposed framework for classifying goal content has the capacity to detect changes in goals occurring during the rehabilitation process, and may be used as a clinical tool during goal-setting conversations for this patient group.