Literature DB >> 28084235

A systematic review of pipeline embolization device for giant intracranial aneurysms.

Xianli Lv1, Huijian Ge1, Hongwei He1, Chuhan Jiang1, Youxiang Li1.   

Abstract

The experience with respect to the treatment of giant intracranial aneurysms with flow-diversion devices is limited. The aim of the present systematic review was to evaluate the effect of the pipeline embolization device (PED) on giant intracranial aneurysms. Eligible related articles were identified by searching the PubMed, Web of Science, Springer, ScienceDirect, and OVID databases using "giant aneurysm" and "pipeline" as the search items. The date of the last search was November 20, 2015. This systematic review adopted the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. In a total of 9 eligible studies with 200 patients and 215 aneurysms, 40 (18.6%) giant (aneurysm diameter >25mm) intracranial aneurysms treated with PED were analyzed. During a 6 to 34 month follow-up, complete occlusion was achieved in 23 (57.5%) cases. Seven patients (17.5%) developed intracranial hemorrhage, 5 developed ischemic attack (12.5%), and 13 (32.5%) developed a mass effect after PED treatment. The complication rate was 77.8% in PED for giant vertebrobasilar artery aneurysms. The cumulative mortality rate for giant paraclinoid carotid artery and middle cerebral artery aneurysms was 13.3% and increased up to 50% for giant vertebrobasilar artery aneurysms. The complete obliteration rate of PED for giant intracranial aneurysms was approximately 60%. Mass effect is the most mechanism of complications. Complication and mortality rates associated with PED for giant vertebrobasilar artery aneurysms are still extremely high.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28084235     DOI: 10.4103/0028-3886.198200

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurol India        ISSN: 0028-3886            Impact factor:   2.117


  7 in total

1.  Early and midterm results of treatment of giant internal carotid artery paraclinoid aneurysms with trapping and flow diverters.

Authors:  Yerbol Makhambetov; Assylbek Kaliyev; Ken-Ichiro Kikuta; Faizulla Smagulov; Yerkin Medetov; Marat Kulmirzayev; Talgat Kerimbayev; Nurlan Kissamedenov; Aigerim Tursynkhan; Aidos Doskaliyev; Serik Akshulakov
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2019-07-15       Impact factor: 2.216

2.  A novel treatment of a patient with a giant ruptured middle cerebral artery aneurysm by acute coiling followed by scheduled Pipeline flex placement.

Authors:  Shikai Liang; Ren Yuan; Xianli Lv
Journal:  Neuroradiol J       Date:  2020-07-16

3.  Complex cerebral aneurysms: intra-luminal reconstruction using Pipeline flow-diverting stent and the obliteration mechanism.

Authors:  Xianli Lv; Chuhan Jiang; Zhongxue Wu; Weijian Jiang; Guihuai Wang
Journal:  Neuroradiol J       Date:  2019-12-11

4.  Unruptured giant intracavernous aneurysms untolerate internal carotid artery occlusion test: Untreated and treated with flow-diversion.

Authors:  Xianli Lv; Jianjun Yu; Ting Liao; Jin Wang; Guihuai Wang
Journal:  Neuroradiol J       Date:  2020-01-17

5.  Comparison of endovascular treatment for middle cerebral artery aneurysm with a low-profile visualized intraluminal support stent or pipeline embolization device.

Authors:  Peng Lu; Ye Zhang; Huanjiang Niu; Yirong Wang
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2019-07-16       Impact factor: 2.447

6.  Multiple overlapping stent-assisted coiling improves efficacy and safety of treatment for complex intracranial aneurysms: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Lingtong You; Jiaxin Huang; Jinning Zhang; Zhixian Jiang
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2021-10-09       Impact factor: 2.819

7.  A Single Flow Re-direction Endoluminal Device for the Treatment of Large and Giant Anterior Circulation Intracranial Aneurysms.

Authors:  Jai Ho Choi; Sook Young Sim; Yong Sam Shin; Joonho Chung
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2022-04       Impact factor: 2.759

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.