Literature DB >> 28084141

Routine clinical application of virtual reality in abdominal surgery.

Gianluca Sampogna1,2, Raffaele Pugliese2,3, Marco Elli1, Angelo Vanzulli1,4, Antonello Forgione2,3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The advantages of 3D reconstruction, immersive virtual reality (VR) and 3D printing in abdominal surgery have been enunciated for many years, but still today their application in routine clinical practice is almost nil. We investigate their feasibility, user appreciation and clinical impact.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Fifteen patients undergoing pancreatic, hepatic or renal surgery were studied realizing a 3D reconstruction of target anatomy. Then, an immersive VR environment was developed to import 3D models, and some details of the 3D scene were printed. All the phases of our workflow employed open-source software and low-cost hardware, easily implementable by other surgical services. A qualitative evaluation of the three approaches was performed by 20 surgeons, who filled in a specific questionnaire regarding a clinical case for each organ considered.
RESULTS: Preoperative surgical planning and intraoperative guidance was feasible for all patients included in the study. The vast majority of surgeons interviewed scored their quality and usefulness as very good.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite extra time, costs and efforts necessary to implement these systems, the benefits shown by the analysis of questionnaires recommend to invest more resources to train physicians to adopt these technologies routinely, even if further and larger studies are still mandatory.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D printing; 3D reconstruction; Virtual reality; hepatobiliarypancreatic surgery; renal surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28084141     DOI: 10.1080/13645706.2016.1275016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol        ISSN: 1364-5706            Impact factor:   2.442


  5 in total

1.  "Pin the Tumor on the Kidney:" An Evaluation of How Surgeons Translate CT and MRI Data to 3D Models.

Authors:  Nicole Wake; James S Wysock; Marc A Bjurlin; Hersh Chandarana; William C Huang
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2019-06-22       Impact factor: 2.649

2.  Augmented visualization with depth perception cues to improve the surgeon's performance in minimally invasive surgery.

Authors:  Lucio Tommaso De Paolis; Valerio De Luca
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 3.  An overview on 3D printing for abdominal surgery.

Authors:  Andrea Pietrabissa; Stefania Marconi; Erika Negrello; Valeria Mauri; Andrea Peri; Luigi Pugliese; Enrico Maria Marone; Ferdinando Auricchio
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-10-11       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Augmented reality (AR) in minimally invasive surgery (MIS) training: where are we now in Italy? The Italian Society of Endoscopic Surgery (SICE) ARMIS survey.

Authors:  Andrea Balla; Alberto Sartori; Emanuele Botteri; Mauro Podda; Monica Ortenzi; Gianfranco Silecchia; Mario Guerrieri; Ferdinando Agresta
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2022-09-21

Review 5.  Anatomical Engineering and 3D Printing for Surgery and Medical Devices: International Review and Future Exponential Innovations.

Authors:  José Cornejo; Jorge A Cornejo-Aguilar; Mariela Vargas; Carlos G Helguero; Rafhael Milanezi de Andrade; Sebastian Torres-Montoya; Javier Asensio-Salazar; Alvaro Rivero Calle; Jaime Martínez Santos; Aaron Damon; Alfredo Quiñones-Hinojosa; Miguel D Quintero-Consuegra; Juan Pablo Umaña; Sebastian Gallo-Bernal; Manolo Briceño; Paolo Tripodi; Raul Sebastian; Paul Perales-Villarroel; Gabriel De la Cruz-Ku; Travis Mckenzie; Victor Sebastian Arruarana; Jiakai Ji; Laura Zuluaga; Daniela A Haehn; Albit Paoli; Jordan C Villa; Roxana Martinez; Cristians Gonzalez; Rafael J Grossmann; Gabriel Escalona; Ilaria Cinelli; Thais Russomano
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 3.411

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.