Rui Shi1,2, Jack P Wang1,3, Ying-Chung Lin1,3,4, Quanzi Li5, Ying-Hsuan Sun6, Hao Chen1, Ronald R Sederoff7, Vincent L Chiang8,9,10. 1. Forest Biotechnology Group, Department of Forestry and Environmental Resources, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, 27695, USA. 2. Mountain Horticultural Crops Research and Extension Center, Department of Horticulture, North Carolina State University, Mills River, NC, 28759, USA. 3. State Key Laboratory of Tree Genetics and Breeding, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin, 150040, China. 4. Department of Life Sciences, College of Life Science, National Taiwan University, Taipei, 10617, Taiwan. 5. State Key Laboratory of Tree Genetics and Breeding, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing, 100091, China. 6. Department of Forestry, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung, 40227, Taiwan. 7. Forest Biotechnology Group, Department of Forestry and Environmental Resources, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, 27695, USA. ron_sederoff@ncsu.edu. 8. Forest Biotechnology Group, Department of Forestry and Environmental Resources, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, 27695, USA. vchiang@ncsu.edu. 9. State Key Laboratory of Tree Genetics and Breeding, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin, 150040, China. vchiang@ncsu.edu. 10. Department of Forest Biomaterials, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, 27695, USA. vchiang@ncsu.edu.
Abstract
MAIN CONCLUSION: Co-expression networks based on transcriptomes of Populus trichocarpa major tissues and specific cell types suggest redundant control of cell wall component biosynthetic genes by transcription factors in wood formation. We analyzed the transcriptomes of five tissues (xylem, phloem, shoot, leaf, and root) and two wood forming cell types (fiber and vessel) of Populus trichocarpa to assemble gene co-expression subnetworks associated with wood formation. We identified 165 transcription factors (TFs) that showed xylem-, fiber-, and vessel-specific expression. Of these 165 TFs, 101 co-expressed (correlation coefficient, r > 0.7) with the 45 secondary cell wall cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin biosynthetic genes. Each cell wall component gene co-expressed on average with 34 TFs, suggesting redundant control of the cell wall component gene expression. Co-expression analysis showed that the 101 TFs and the 45 cell wall component genes each has two distinct groups (groups 1 and 2), based on their co-expression patterns. The group 1 TFs (44 members) are predominantly xylem and fiber specific, and are all highly positively co-expressed with the group 1 cell wall component genes (30 members), suggesting their roles as major wood formation regulators. Group 1 TFs include a lateral organ boundary domain gene (LBD) that has the highest number of positively correlated cell wall component genes (36) and TFs (47). The group 2 TFs have 57 members, including 14 vessel-specific TFs, and are generally less correlated with the cell wall component genes. An exception is a vessel-specific basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) gene that negatively correlates with 20 cell wall component genes, and may function as a key transcriptional suppressor. The co-expression networks revealed here suggest a well-structured transcriptional homeostasis for cell wall component biosynthesis during wood formation.
MAIN CONCLUSION: Co-expression networks based on transcriptomes of Populus trichocarpa major tissues and specific cell types suggest redundant control of cell wall component biosynthetic genes by transcription factors in wood formation. We analyzed the transcriptomes of five tissues (xylem, phloem, shoot, leaf, and root) and two wood forming cell types (fiber and vessel) of Populus trichocarpa to assemble gene co-expression subnetworks associated with wood formation. We identified 165 transcription factors (TFs) that showed xylem-, fiber-, and vessel-specific expression. Of these 165 TFs, 101 co-expressed (correlation coefficient, r > 0.7) with the 45 secondary cell wall cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin biosynthetic genes. Each cell wall component gene co-expressed on average with 34 TFs, suggesting redundant control of the cell wall component gene expression. Co-expression analysis showed that the 101 TFs and the 45 cell wall component genes each has two distinct groups (groups 1 and 2), based on their co-expression patterns. The group 1 TFs (44 members) are predominantly xylem and fiber specific, and are all highly positively co-expressed with the group 1 cell wall component genes (30 members), suggesting their roles as major wood formation regulators. Group 1 TFs include a lateral organ boundary domain gene (LBD) that has the highest number of positively correlated cell wall component genes (36) and TFs (47). The group 2 TFs have 57 members, including 14 vessel-specific TFs, and are generally less correlated with the cell wall component genes. An exception is a vessel-specific basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) gene that negatively correlates with 20 cell wall component genes, and may function as a key transcriptional suppressor. The co-expression networks revealed here suggest a well-structured transcriptional homeostasis for cell wall component biosynthesis during wood formation.
Authors: Melissa S Cline; Michael Smoot; Ethan Cerami; Allan Kuchinsky; Nerius Landys; Chris Workman; Rowan Christmas; Iliana Avila-Campilo; Michael Creech; Benjamin Gross; Kristina Hanspers; Ruth Isserlin; Ryan Kelley; Sarah Killcoyne; Samad Lotia; Steven Maere; John Morris; Keiichiro Ono; Vuk Pavlovic; Alexander R Pico; Aditya Vailaya; Peng-Liang Wang; Annette Adler; Bruce R Conklin; Leroy Hood; Martin Kuiper; Chris Sander; Ilya Schmulevich; Benno Schwikowski; Guy J Warner; Trey Ideker; Gary D Bader Journal: Nat Protoc Date: 2007 Impact factor: 13.491
Authors: Manoj Kumar; Shivegowda Thammannagowda; Vincent Bulone; Vincent Chiang; Kyung-Hwan Han; Chandrashekhar P Joshi; Shawn D Mansfield; Ewa Mellerowicz; Björn Sundberg; Tuula Teeri; Brian E Ellis Journal: Trends Plant Sci Date: 2009-04-16 Impact factor: 18.313
Authors: M Taylor-Teeples; L Lin; M de Lucas; G Turco; T W Toal; A Gaudinier; N F Young; G M Trabucco; M T Veling; R Lamothe; P P Handakumbura; G Xiong; C Wang; J Corwin; A Tsoukalas; L Zhang; D Ware; M Pauly; D J Kliebenstein; K Dehesh; I Tagkopoulos; G Breton; J L Pruneda-Paz; S E Ahnert; S A Kay; S P Hazen; S M Brady Journal: Nature Date: 2014-12-24 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Ying-Chung Jimmy Lin; Hao Chen; Quanzi Li; Wei Li; Jack P Wang; Rui Shi; Sermsawat Tunlaya-Anukit; Peng Shuai; Zhifeng Wang; Hongyan Ma; Huiyu Li; Ying-Hsuan Sun; Ronald R Sederoff; Vincent L Chiang Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2017-10-23 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Arthur Zwaenepoel; Tim Diels; David Amar; Thomas Van Parys; Ron Shamir; Yves Van de Peer; Oren Tzfadia Journal: Front Plant Sci Date: 2018-03-19 Impact factor: 5.753
Authors: Baoguang Liu; Juan Liu; Jing Yu; Zhifeng Wang; Yi Sun; Shuang Li; Ying-Chung Jimmy Lin; Vincent L Chiang; Wei Li; Jack P Wang Journal: Plant Physiol Date: 2021-05-27 Impact factor: 8.340